163
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Involving the Public—Participatory Methods and Democratic Ideals

, &
Pages 191-201 | Published online: 10 Feb 2014

References

  • Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. “Journal of the American Planning Association”, 35,4.
  • BECAGP (1997). Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. “Nature”, 387: 845–847.
  • Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.) (1997). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The New tyranny? Zed Books.
  • Dworkin, R. (1978). Liberalism. In Hampshire, S. (ed.). Public and Private Morality. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment. The politics of local knowledge. Duke.
  • Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P. (eds.) (2003). Debating Deliberative Democracy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Habermas, J. (1996). Three Normative Models of Democracy. In: Benhabib, S. (ed.). Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton University Press.
  • Hennen, L. (1999). Participatory technology assessment: A response to technical modernity? “Science and Public Policy”, 26, 5: 303–312.
  • Hill, A. and Michael, M. (1998). Engineering acceptance: Representations of 'The Public'in debates on biotechnology. In: Wheale et al. (eds). The Social Management of Genetic Engineering. Ashgate, pp. 201–17.
  • Ignatieff, M. (1992). Why ‘Community’ is a Dishonest Word. “The Observer” editorial page, 3 May.
  • Jensen, K.K. (2003). Public Participatory Procedures and Different Notions of Democratic Legitimacy. Paper prepared for the EU project Ethical Bio-TA Tools.
  • Joss, S. and Durant, J. (1995). Introduction. In: Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds). Public Participation in Science. London: Science Museum, pp. 9–13.
  • Klüver, L. Nentwich, M. Peissl, W. Torgersen, H. Gloede, F. Hennen, L. Eijndhoven, J.v. Est, R.v. Joss, S. Bellucci, S. Bütschi, D. (2000) EUROPTA. European Participatory Technology Assessment. The Danish Board of Technology.
  • MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.) (1999). The social shaping of technology. Open University Press.
  • Marjolein, B.A. and Rijkens-Klomp, N. (2002). A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective. “Global Environmental Change”, 12: 167–184.
  • Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. “Science, Technology and Human Values”, 25, 1: 3–29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.