Fostering historical learning in elementary education through whole class shared reading activities (Fomentando el aprendizaje histórico en Educación Primaria mediante actividades de lectura compartida)

References / Referencias

• Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistic and Education, 16(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Pearson, D. (1984). A schema- theoric view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Perfetti, C. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In J. F. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 43–72). LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, M., Asensio, M., & Pozo, J. I. (1991). Cognitive development, historical time representation and causal explanations in adolescence. In M. Carretero, M. Pope, R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction. Vol.III. European research in an international context (pp. 27–48). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A., & Woodcock, J. (2006). Mussolini’s missing marbles: Simulating history at GCSE. Teaching History, 17–27. https://research.edgehill.ac.uk/en/publications/mussolinis-missing-marbles-simulating-history-at-gcse-2
   Google Scholar
• Cho, B.-Y., & Afflerbach, P. (2017). An evolving perspective of constructively responsive reading comprehension strategies in multilayered digital text environments. In S. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 109–134). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N., Resnick, L. B., Penstein Rosé, C., Corno, L., & Anderman, E. M. (2016). Dialogic instruction: A new frontier. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. 3rd edition (pp. 278–388). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• De Keyser, R., & Vandepitte, P. (Eds.) (1998). Historical Formation. Design of Vision. Flemish Board for Catholic Secondary Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, D. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170536
   Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2009). Cognitive strategy instruction. In G. G. Duffy & S. E. Israel (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp 347–372). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Donker, A., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath -van Ewijk, C., & van der Werf, M. (2014). Effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggella-Luby, M. N., Graner, P. S., Desbler, D. D., & Drew, S. V. (2012). Building a house on sand. Why disciplinary literacy is not sufficient to replace general strategies for adolescent learners who struggle. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 69–84. http://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318245618e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & Alexander, P. (2017). Text and comprehension. A retrospective, perspective and prospective. In S. E. Israel, & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 227–239). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & Alexander, P. (2011). Learning to read. In R. Mayer, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 7–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• García, J. R., Montanero, M., Lucero, M., Cañedo, I., & Sánchez, E. (2018). Comparing rhetorical devices in history textbooks and teachers’ lessons: Implication for the development of academic language skills. Linguistic and Education, 47, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C., & Readi, P. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to lead for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez Carrasco, C. J., & Miralles, Martínez, P. (2017). Los espejos de Clío. Usos y abusos de la Historia en el ámbito escolar (Clio’s mirrors. Uses and abuses of Historyin the school setting). Sílex.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_4
   Google Scholar
• Havekes, H., Coppen, P., Luttenberg, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2012). Knowing and doing history: A conceptual framework and pedagogy for teaching historical contextualization. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 11(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.11.1.06
   Google Scholar
• Havekes, H., van Boxtel, C., Coppen, P.-A., & Luttenberg, J. (2017). Stimulating historical thinking in a classroom discussion: The role of the teacher. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures, and History Education, 4(2), 71–93. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/d3fc2649-2c32-462e-b6b0-fe18b0feb450
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (2017). The texts of literacy instruction: Obstacles to or opportunities for educational equity?. Literacy research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917718521
   Google Scholar
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., Dickinson, A., & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”: Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89731-5
   Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revision on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 525–556. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, C., Marple, S., Greenleaf, C., Charney-Sirott, I., Bolz, M. J., Richardson, L. K., Hall, A. H., George, M., & Goldman, S. R. (2017). Text-based argumentation with multiple sources: A descriptive study of opportunity to learn in secondary English Language arts, history, and science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(1), 79–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1256809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo, S. M., Tortorelli, L., Invernizzi, M., Ryoo, J. H., & Strong, J. Z. (2019). An exploration of text difficulty and knowledge support on adolescents’ comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterman, L., & Sharples, M. (2002). A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history. Computers and Education, 38(1–3), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00072-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanero, M., & Lucero, M. (2011). Causal discourse and the teaching of history. How do teachers explain historical causality? Instructional Science, 39(2), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9112-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C., & Reisman, A. (2016). Studying historical understanding. In L. Corno, & E. Anderman (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 281–294). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., Wilkinson, I., Soter, A., Hennessey, M., & Alexander, J. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students´ high-level comprehension text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., Beach, K. D., Sanchez, V. M., Bocian, K. M., & Flynn, L. J. (2015). Building BRIDGES: A design experiment to improve reading and United States history knowledge of poor readers in eighth grade. Exceptional Children, 48, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563706
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, D. R., Larking, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the inter- mediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okkinga, M., Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J. S., van Schooten, E., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9445-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, C., & Seixas, P. (2008). Benchmarks of historical thinking: First steps. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4), 1015–1038. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ830511.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature ofconstructively responsive reading. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A., Enumah, L., & Jay, L. (2020) Interpretive frames for responding to racially stressful moments in history discussions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1718569
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., Greer, S., & Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 3(2), 174–181. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.180659010342538
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school? The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 636–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C. (2017). Comprehension in the disciplines. In E. I. Susan (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 479–499). The Gilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topolski, J. (1991). Towards and integrated model of historical explanation. History and Theory, 30(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176–200). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2013). Historical reasoning in the classroom: What does it look like and how can we enhance it? Teaching History, 150, 44–52. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.401491
   Google Scholar
• Van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., Carretero, M., Kenner, J., & Ney, L. (1994). The collapse of the Soviet Union: A case study in causal reasoning. In M. Carretero, & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social science (pp. 403–430). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wansink, B. G. J., Akkerman, S. F., & Wubbels, T. (2016). The certainty paradox of student history teachers: Balancing between historical facts and interpretation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welie, C., Schoonen, R., Kuiken, F., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Expository text comprehension in secondary school: For which readers does knowledge of connectives contribute the most? Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12090
   Google Scholar
• Wharton-McDonald, R., & Erickson, J. (2017). Reading comprehension in the middle grades: Characteristics, challenges, and effective supports. In S. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 353–376). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I., Murphy, P., & Binici, S. (2015). Dialogue-intensive pedagogies for promoting reading comprehension: What we know, what we need to know. In L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 35–48). AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar