Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms

References

• Alchourrón, C. E., & Bulygin, E. (1981). The expressive conception of norms. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New studies in deontic logic (pp. 95–124). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrossio, D. A., Parent, X., & van der Torre, L. (2016). Cumulative aggregation. In O. Roy, A. Tamminga, & M. Willer (Eds.), 13th International conference deontic logic and normative systems DEON 2016 (pp. 1–15). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Amgoud, L., & Cayrol, C. (1997). Integrating preference orderings into argument-based reasoning. In Qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning: First international joint conference on qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning, ECSQARU-FAPR (pp. 159–170). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. (2007). On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 171, 675–700. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirlaen, M., & Straßer, C. (2016). A structured argumentation framework for detaching conditional obligations. In O. Roy, A. Tamminga, & M. Willer (Eds.), 13th International conference deontic logic and normative systems DEON 2016 (pp. 32–48). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (2010). Argumentation in legal reasoning. In I. Rahwan & G. Simari (Eds.), Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/in/book/9780387981963P
   Google Scholar
• Boella, G., Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., & van der Torre, L. (2010a). Lex minus dixit quam voluit, lex magis dixit quam voluit: A formal study on legal compliance and interpretation. In G. A. P. Casanovas, U. Pagallo, & G. Sartor (Eds.), AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems (pp. 162–183). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boella, G., Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., & van der Torre, L. (2010b). A logical understanding of legal interpretation. In Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR) (pp. 563–565). Retrieved from https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/KR/KR2010/paper/view/1379
   Google Scholar
• Boella, G., & van der Torre, L. (2004). Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multi-agent systems. In D. Dubois, C. A. Welty, & M. A. Williams (Eds.), Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning: Proceedings of the ninth international conference (KR 2004) (pp. 255–266). Whistler: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boella, G., & van der Torre, L. (2006a). Constitutive norms in the design of normative multiagent systems. In 6th International workshop computational logic in multi-agent systems CLIMA VI (pp. 303–319). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boella, G., & van der Torre, L. (2006b). A logical architecture of a normative system. In L. Goble & J. J. C. Meyer (Eds.), Deontic logic and artificial normative systems (Vol. 4048, pp. 24–35). Utrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Broersen, J. M., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., & L. W. N. van der Torre (2001). The BOID architecture: Conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on autonomous agents, AGENTS 2001 (pp. 9–16). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, J. (2013). Rationality through reasoning. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bulygin, E. (1986). Permissive norms and normative concepts. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• da Costa Pereira, C., Liao, B., Malerba, A., Rotolo, A., Tettamanzi, A. G. B., & van der Torre, L. (2017). Handling norms in multi-agent systems by means of formal argumentation. Ifcolog Journal of Logics and Their Applications, 4(9), 3039–3074. (To appear in Chopra, A., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H., & Villata, S. (Eds.). Handbook of normative multiagent systems).
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson, S. (1968). Preference and obligation: Studies in the logic of ethics. Uppsala: Filosofiska foereningen.
   Google Scholar
• Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), 321–357. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbay, D., Horty, J., Parent, X., van der Meyden, R., & van der Torre, L. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems. London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Governatori, G., & Rotolo, A. (2008 August). BIO logical agents: Norms, beliefs, intentions in defeasible logic. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 17(1), 36–69. doi: 10.1007/s10458-008-9030-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governatori, G., & Rotolo, A. (2010). Changing legal systems: Legal abrogations and annulments in defeasible logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 18(1), 157–194. doi: 10.1093/jigpal/jzp075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, D., & Jones, A. (2013). Constitutive norms and counts-as conditionals. In J. Horty, D. Gabbay, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, & L. van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 407–441). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, B. (1969). An analysis of some deontic logics. Noûs, 3(4), 373–398. doi: 10.2307/2214372
   Google Scholar
• Horty, J. F. (2001). Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1011288805074
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, B., Oren, N., van der Torre, L., & Villata, S. (2016). Prioritized norms and defaults in formal argumentation. In O. Roy, A. Tamminga, & M. Willer (Eds.), 13th International conference deontic logic and normative systems DEON 2016 (pp. 139–154). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, B., Oren, N., van der Torre, L., & Villata, S. (2018). Prioritized norms in formal argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, exy009. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exy009
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, L., & Odelstad, J. (2003). Normative systems and their revision: An algebraic approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11(2–3), 81–104. doi: 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046005.10529.47
   Google Scholar
• Makinson, D. (1999). On a fundamental problem of deontic logic. In P. McNamara & H. Prakken (Eds.), Norms, logics and information systems. New studies on deontic logic and computer science (pp. 29–54). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. (2000). Input-output logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 29(4), 383–408. doi: 10.1023/A:1004748624537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. (2001). Constraints for input-output logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 30(2), 155–185. doi: 10.1023/A:1017599526096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. (2003). Permission from an input/output perspective. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 32, 391–416. doi: 10.1023/A:1024806529939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modgil, S., & Prakken, H. (2013). A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence, 195, 361–397. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, X., & van der Torre, L. (2014). Sing and Dance! In F. Cariani, D. Grossi, J. Meheus, & X. Parent (Eds.), Deontic logic and normative systems (Vol. 8554, pp. 149–165). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, X., & van der Torre, L. (2017). Detachment in normative systems: Examples, inference patterns, properties. Ifcolog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(9), 2995–3038. (To appear in Chopra, A., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H., & Villata, S. (Eds.). Handbook of normative multiagent systems.)
   Google Scholar
• Pigozzi, G., & van der Torre, L. (2017). Multiagent deontic logic and its challenges from a normative systems perspective. Ifcolog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(9), 2929–2994. (To appear in Chopra, A., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H., & Villata, S. (Eds.). Handbook of normative multiagent systems.)
   Google Scholar
• Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (2013). Formalising arguments about norms. In E. Francesconi, G. Sartor, & D. Tiscornia (Eds.), Legal knowledge and informations systems (pp. 121–130). JURIX. Retrieved from https://www.iospress.nl/book/legal-knowledge-and-information-systems-8/
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (1941). Imperatives and logic. Theoria, 7, 53–71. (Reprinted in Philosophy of Science 11: 30–46, 1944.)
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenius, E. (1963). Principles of a logic of normative systems. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, 247–260.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., & van der Torre, L. (2014). Combining constitutive and regulative norms in input/output logic. In F. Cariani, D. Grossi, J. Meheus, & X. Parent (Eds.), Deontic logic and normative systems (Vol. 8554, pp. 241–257). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Torre, L., & Tan, Y. (2001). Dynamic normative reasoning under uncertainty: How to distinguish between obligations under uncertainty and prima facie obligations. In D. Gabbay & P. Smets (Eds.), Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems, Vol. 6: Agents, reasoning and dynamics (pp. 267–297). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Torre, L., & Villata, S. (2014). An ASPIC-based legal argumentation framework for deontic reasoning. Computational models of argument – Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Pitlochry, Scotland (pp. 421–432).
   Google Scholar