220
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Vagueness as an epiphenomenon, and non-transitivity

Pages 156-186 | Received 19 Apr 2022, Accepted 10 Oct 2022, Published online: 31 Oct 2022

References

  • Akama, S. (1988, Winter). Constructive predicate logic with strong negation and model theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 29(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093637767
  • Almukdad, A., & Nelson, D. (1984, March). Constructible falsity and inexact predicates. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49(1), 231–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/2274105
  • Arrow, J. K., & Debreu, G. (1954, July). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907353
  • Bolzano, B. (1973). In J. Berg (Ed.), Theory of science. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  • Burgess, J. A., & Humberstone, L. (1987). Natural deduction rules for a logic of vagueness. Erkenntnis, 27(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175369
  • Cobreros, P., Egre, P., Ripley, D., & Van Rooiz, R. (2012, April). Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(2), 347–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9165-z
  • Epstein, R. L. (1979). Relatedness and implication. Philosophical Studies, 36(2), 137–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354267
  • Fine, K. (1975). Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese, 30(3–4), 265–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485047
  • Fitch, F. B. (1952). Symbolic logic, an introduction. The Ronald Press Company.
  • Geach, P. T. (1970). Entailment. The Philosophical Review, 79(2), 237–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183950
  • Gurevich, Y. (1977). Intuitionistic logic with strong negation. Studia Logica, 36(1–2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02121114
  • Jamison, T. D., & Lau, L. J. (1977, October). The nature of equilibrium with semiordered preferences. Econometrica, 45(7), 1595–1605. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913952
  • Kamp, H. (1981). The paradox of the heap. In U. Mönnich (Ed.), Aspects of philosophical logic. Synthese Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science), vol. 147. Springer.
  • Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563). Oxford University Press.
  • Luce, R. D. (1956, April). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905751
  • Nelson, D. (1949). Constructible falsity. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 14(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2268973
  • Priest, G. (2008). An introduction to non-classical logic: From if to is (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Sainsbury, M. (1996). Concepts without boundaries. In R. Keefe, & P. Smith (Eds.), Vagueness: A reader (pp. 251–264). MIT Press.
  • Sextus, E. (2000). In J. Annas & J. Barnes (Eds.), Outlines of scepticism. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sextus, E. (2005). In R. Belt (Ed.), Against the logicians. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Smiley, T. J. (1958). Entailment and deducibility. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59(1), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/59.1.233
  • Smullyan, R. (1995). First-order logic. Dover Publications.
  • Thomason, R. (1969). A semantical study of constructible falsity. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 15(16–18), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3870
  • Waismann, F. (1945). Verifiability. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 19(1), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/19.1.101
  • Zardini, E. (2008). A model of tolerance. Studia Logica, 90(3), 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9156-z

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.