Pathways to parenting in New Zealand: issues in law, policy and practice

References

• Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology 2004. Introduction and guiding principles. http://www.acart.health.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexcm/acart-aboutus-home. ( accessed June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Avery R 2010. An examination of theory and promising practice for achieving permanency for teens before they age out of foster care. Children and Youth Services Review 32: 399–408.10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehal N, Ellison S, Baker C, Sinclair I 2010. Belonging and permanence: outcomes in long-term foster care and adoption. London, BAAF.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley J 1997. Kei konei tonu matou (we are still here). In: Sprengers K ed Adoption and healing. Proceedings of the international conference on adoption and healing. Wellington, New Zealand Adoption Education & Healing Trust. Pp. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( n.d.). Assisted reproductive technology (ART). http://www.cdc.gov/art/ ( accessed June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Child, Youth and Family 2007. Caregivers speak: understanding the experiences and needs of caregivers. http://www.cyf.govt.nz/documents/about-us/publications/reports/caregivers-speak.pdf ( accessed March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Child, Youth and Family 2010. Why you should care. http://www.cyf.govt.nz/about-us/news/2010/why-you-should-care.html ( accessed May 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Child, Youth and Family 2011a. Home for life support. CYF Practice Centre. http://practicecentre.cyf.govt.nz/policy/permanent-care-and-creating-a-home-for-life/resources/home-for-life-support.html ( accessed April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Child, Youth and Family 2011b. Home for life brochure. http://www.cyf.govt.nz/info-for-caregivers/home-for-life/home-for-life-brochure.pdf ( accessed April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Child, Youth and Family 2012. Adoptions Framework Perspectives. http://www.practicecentre.cyf.govt.nz/knowledge-base-practice-frameworks/adoptions/perspectives/index.html ( accessed April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Connolly M, Cashmore J 2009. Child welfare practice. In: Connolly M, Harms L eds. Social work: contexts and practice. Melbourne, Oxford University Press. Pp. 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly M, Smith R 2010. Reforming child welfare: an integrated approach. Child Welfare 89(3): 9–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K 1988. Artificial insemination using donor semen and the issue of secrecy: the views of donors and recipient couples. Social Science & Medicine 27: 377–383.10.1016/0277-9536(88)90272-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Taylor K 1993. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences 12: 155–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyhrberg M 2001. Intercountry adoptions, Pacific Rim adoptions: the impact of European law on customary adoption practices. Proceedings of International Bar Association Conference. Cancun, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth V, Larner W 2009. Racialising the ‘social development’ state: investing in children in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Social Politics 16: 132–158.10.1093/sp/jxp001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott N 2013. Consider children's rights too. New Zealand Herald, 11 March. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10870391 ( accessed May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Else A 1991. A question of adoption: closed stranger adoption in New Zealand 1944–1974. Wellington, Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Else A 2011. Adoption Te Ara—the Encyclopedia of New Zealand, updated 11 March 2011. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/adoption ( accessed November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Evan B Donaldson Adoption Institute 2006. Expanding resources for children: is adoption by gays and lesbians part of the answer for boys and girls who need homes? New York, Evan B Donaldson Adoption Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Frengley S 2007. Kinship care: roots or grafts? MSW thesis. University of Otago, Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Friar D 2012. It's past time the law caught up with modern families. New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/adoption/news/article.cfm?c_id=1500906&objectid=10811536 ( accessed June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs A 2010. Parenting adopted children and supporting adoptive parents: messages from research. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work 22(2): 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Fluke J, O'Donnell M, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Brownell M, Gulliver P et al. 2011. Child maltreatment: variation in trends and policies in six developed countries. Lancet, 9 December online. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke S, Payne D 2009. Embryo donation in New Zealand: a pilot study. Human Reproduction 24: 1939–1945.10.1093/humrep/dep116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith K 1996. New Zealand adoption history and practice, social and legal: 1840–1996. Wellington, New Zealand: K.C. Griffith, MBA.
   Google Scholar
• Hague Convention 1993. Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption. http://www.hcch.net ( accessed June 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Iwanek M 1997. Adoption in New Zealand: past, present, future. In: Sprengers K ed. Adoption and healing. Proceedings of the international conference on adoption and healing. Wellington, New Zealand Adoption Education & Healing Trust. Pp. 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Keane B 2011. Whāngai—customary fostering and adoption. Te Ara—the Encyclopedia of New Zealand, updated 10 May 2011. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/whangai-customary-fostering-and-adoption ( accessed March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission 2000. Adoption and its alternatives: a different approach and a new framework. Report No. 65. Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Ludbrook R 2011. Adoption action news and views August 2011. Available from: [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Lunt N 2008. From welfare state to social development: winning the war of words in New Zealand. Social Policy and Society 7: 405–418.10.1017/S1474746408004387
   Google Scholar
• McAlonan V, Scherman R ( n.d.). Not such a queer situation after all: a critical review of the research on gay and lesbian adoptive parenting from a New Zealand perspective. Unpublished paper, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• McRae KO, Nikora LW 2006. Whāngai: Remembering, understanding and experiencing. MAI Review 1 (Intern Research Report 7).
   Google Scholar
• Munson M, McMillen JC 2009. Natural mentoring and psychosocial outcomes among older youth transitioning from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review 31: 104–111.10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office 2010. Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0092/latest/whole.html ( accessed June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Yearbook 2010. The New Zealand official yearbook. Wellington, Statistics New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Law Commission ( n.d.). Surrogacy. http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/pp/PP54/PP54-4_.html ( accessed June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Parfitt T 2013. Putin threatens to halt adoption of Russian children over gay marriage. Independent. ie. http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/putin-threatens-to-halt-adoption-of-russian-children-over-gay-marriage-29225793.html ( accessed May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Pitama S 1997. The effects of traditional and non-traditional adoption practices on Maori mental health. In: Sprengers K ed. Adoption and healing. Proceedings of the international conference on adoption and healing. Wellington, New Zealand Adoption Education & Healing Trust. Pp. 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rockel J, Ryburn M 1988. Adoption today: Change and choice in New Zealand. Heinemann Read, , Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Scherman R 2012. Openness and intercountry adoption in New Zealand. In: Gibbons J, Rotabi K eds. Intercountry adoption: policy, practices and outcomes. Burlington, Ashgate Publishing. Pp. 283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Scherman R, Harré N 2004. Intercountry adoption of Eastern European children in New Zealand: parents' attitudes toward the importance of culture. Adoption & Fostering 28(3): 62–72.10.1177/030857590402800308
   Google Scholar
• Shannon D 2001. Adoption reunion practice model. MSW dissertation. University of Otago, Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Stuff.Co.Nz 2013 Marriage Equality Bill passes third reading. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/8560494/Marriage-equality-bill-passes-third-reading ( accessed May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• UNCROC 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm ( accessed April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Walker S 2001. The Maatua Whangai Programme O Otepoti: from a caregiver perspective. Master of Consumer and Applied Sciences thesis. University of Otago, Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall J 2008. Kin care—understanding the dynamics. Social Work Now 40(3): 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall J 2009. When grandparents take custody—changing intergenerational relationships: the New Zealand experience. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships 7: 259–273.10.1080/15350770902851106
   Google Scholar
• Young A 2012. Political rivals unite on gay adoptions. New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10808932 ( accessed June 2012).
   Google Scholar