6,364
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Using environmental imperatives to reduce meat consumption: perspectives from New Zealand

Pages 99-110 | Received 10 Jan 2018, Accepted 08 Mar 2018, Published online: 25 Mar 2018

References

  • Baggini J. 2002. Making sense: philosophy behind the headlines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Barr S. 2006. Environmental action in the home: investigating the value-action gap. Geography. 91(1):43–54.
  • Berrysmith Foundation. 2015. Eat your greens projects [Internet]; [accessed 2017 Jan 18]. http://www.berrysmith.org/projects/meat-free-monday.
  • Buttriss JL. 2011. Feeding the planet: an unprecedented confluence of pressures anticipated. Nutrition Bulletin. 36(2):235–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2011.01894.x
  • De Bakker E, Dagevos H. 2012. Reducing meat consumption in today’s consumer society: questioning the citizen-consumer gap. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics. 25:877–894. doi: 10.1007/s10806-011-9345-z
  • De Boer J, Helms M, Aiking H. 2006. Protein consumption and sustainability: diet diversity in EU-15. Ecological Economics. 59:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.011
  • De Boer J, Schösler H, Aiking H. 2014. ‘Meatless days’ or ‘less is better’? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite. 76:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). 2008. A framework for pro-environmental behaviours. London: DEFRA.
  • Duchin F. 2005. Sustainable consumption of food: a framework for analysing scenarios about changes in diet. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 9(1/2):99–114.
  • Garnett T, Godde C, Muller A, Röös E, Smith P, de Boer I, Ermgassen E, Herrero M, van Middlelaar C, Schader C, et al. 2017. Grazed and confused – food climate research network [Internet]; [accessed 2018 Mar 6]. https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/project-files/fcrn_gnc_report.pdf.
  • Gerbens-Leenes PW, Nonhebel S. 2002. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food. Ecological Economics. 42(1–2):185–199. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00049-6
  • Godfray HCJ, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Nisbett N, Pretty J, Robinson S, Toulmin C, Whiteley R. 2010. The future of the global food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 365:2769–2777. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0180
  • Goodland R. 1997. Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters. Ecological Economics. 23(3):189–200. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00579-X
  • Grunert KG. 2006. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science. 74(1):149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016
  • Guthman J, Brown S. 2016. Midas' not-so-golden touch: on the demise of methyl iodide as a soil fumigant in California. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 18(3):324–341.
  • Hauser M, Jonas K, Riemann R. 2011. Measuring salient food attitudes and food-related values. An elaborated, conflicting and interdependent system. Appetite. 57(2):329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.322
  • Hoek AC, Luning PA, Weijzen P, Engels W, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. 2011. Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person – and – product related factors in consumer acceptance. Appetite. 56(3):662–673. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001
  • Holm L, Møhl M. 2000. The role of meat in everyday food culture: an analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Appetite. 34(3):277–283. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0324
  • Johnson M, Fryer K, Raggett N. 2008. Household sustainability survey 2008 [Internet]; [accessed 2017 Jan 18]. http://www.researchnz.com/pdf/Household%20Sustainability%20Survey%202008.pdf.
  • Johnston J. 2008. The citizen-consumer hybrid: ideological tensions and the case of the whole foods market. Theoretical Sociology. 37:229–270. doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9058-5
  • Lea E, Worsley A. 2001. Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite. 36(2):127–136. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0386
  • Lea E, Worsley A, Crawford D. 2005. Australian adult consumers’ beliefs about plant foods: a qualitative study. Health Education & Behavior. 32(6):795–808. doi: 10.1177/1090198105277323
  • Liamputtong P. 2011. Focus group methodology. Principles and practice. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • McAlpine CA, Etter A, Fearnside PM, Seabrook L, Laurance WF. 2009. Increasing world consumption of beef as driver of regional and global change: a call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland (Australia), Colombia and Brazil. Global Environmental Change. 19(1):21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.008
  • Mhurchu CN, Gorton D. 2007. Nutrition labels and claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 31(2):105–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00026.x
  • Miller D. 2010. Stuff. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Ministry for the Environment (MfE). 2016. New Zealand’s greenhouse gas inventor [Internet]; [accessed 2017 Jan 18]. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/reporting-greenhouse-gas-emissions/nzs-greenhouse-gas-inventory.
  • Monaghan RM, Wilcock RR, Smith LC, Tikkisetty B, Thorrold BS, Costall D. 2007. Linkages between land management activities and water quality in an intensively farmed catchment in southern New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 118(1–4):211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.016
  • New Zealand (NZ) Nutrition Foundation. 2013. Protein [Internet]; [accessed 2017 Jan 18]. http://www.nutritionfoundation.org.nz/nutrition-facts/Nutrients/protein.
  • New Zealand Trade & Enterprise (NZTE). 2017. Meat [Internet]; [accessed 2017 Jan 17]. https://www.nzte.govt.nz/en/buy/our-sectors/food-and-beverage/meat/.
  • Odegard IYR, Van der Voet E. 2014. The future of food – scenarios and the effect on natural resource use in agriculture in 2050. Ecological Economics. 97(5):51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.005
  • OECD. 2016. Meat consumption (indicator) [Internet]; [accessed 2016 Nov 2]. https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htmOECD-FAO.
  • Pearce F. 2017. Grass-fed beef is bad for planet and causes climate change [Internet]; [accessed 2018 Mar 6]. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2149220-grass-fed-beef-is-bad-for-the-planet-and-causes-climate-change/.
  • Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Bodiersky B. 2010. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Global Environmental Change. 20(3):451–462. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001
  • Prescott J, Young O, O’Neill L, Yau NJN, Stevens R. 2002. Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference. 13:489–495. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00010-1
  • Richardson NJ, MacFie HJH, Shepherd R. 1994. Consumer attitudes to meat eating. Meat Science. 36(1–2):57–65. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(94)90033-7
  • Richardson NJ, Shepherd R, Elliman NA. 1993. Current attitudes and future influences on meat consumption in the U.K. Appetite. 21(1):41–51. doi: 10.1006/appe.1993.1035
  • Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. 2003. Carrying out qualitative data analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage; p. 219–262.
  • Röös E, Ekelund L, Tjärnemo H. 2014. Communicating the environmental impact of meat production: challenges in the development of a Swedish meat guide. Journal of Cleaner Production. 73:154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.037
  • Schösler H, De Boer J, Boersema JJ. 2012. Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substation. Appetite. 58(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.009
  • Tivadar B, Luthar B. 2005. Food, ethics and aesthetics. Appetite. 44(2):215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.10.002
  • Tobler C, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M. 2011. Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite. 57(3):674–682. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010
  • Tucker C. 2013. Insects, offal, feet and faces: acquiring new tastes in New Zealand? New Zealand Sociology. 28(4):101–122.
  • Tucker CA. 2014. The significance of sensory appeal for reduced meat consumption. Appetite. 81:168–179. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.022
  • Vanhonacker F, Van Loo EJ, Gellynck X, Verbeke W. 2013. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite. 62:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.003
  • Vinnari M, Tapio P. 2012. Sustainability of diets: from concepts to governance. Ecological Economics. 74:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.012
  • Vranken L, Avermaete T, Petalios D, Mathijs E. 2014. Curbing global meat consumption: emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition. Environmental Science & Policy. 39:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.009
  • Westhoek H, Lesschen JP, Rood T, Wagner S, De Marco A, Murphy-Bokern D, Liep A, van Grinsven H, Sutton MA, Oenema O. 2014. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Global Environmental Change. 26:196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004
  • York R, Gossard MH. 2004. Cross-national meat and fish consumption: exploring the effects of modernisation and ecological context. Ecological Economics. 48(3):293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.009

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.