5,416
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

Inclusionary policy and marginalised groups in Aoteaora/New Zealand process, impacts and politics

ORCID Icon
Pages 246-260 | Received 01 Mar 2018, Accepted 11 Jun 2018, Published online: 21 Jun 2018

References

  • Agger A. 2012. Towards tailor-made participation: how to involve different types of citizens in participatory governance. Town Planning Review. 83(1):29–45. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2012.2
  • Aimers J. 2011. The impact of New Zealand ‘Third Way’ style government on women in community development. Community Development Journal. 46(3):302–314. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsr033
  • Aimers J, Walker P. 2008. Is community accountability being overlooked as a result of government-third sector partnering in New Zealand? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work. 20(3):14–24.
  • Arnstein SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 35(4):216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  • Bächtiger A, Niemeyer S, Neblo M, Steenbergen MR, Steiner J. 2010. Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy. 18(1):32–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x
  • Bächtiger A, Steenbergen MR, Niemeyer S. 2007. Deliberative democracy: an introduction. Swiss Political Science Review. 13(4):485–496. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00086.x
  • Barnes M, Knops A, Newman J, Sullivan H. 2004. Recent research: the micro-politics of deliberation: case studies in public participation. Contemporary Politics. 10(2):93–110. doi: 10.1080/1356977042000278756
  • Barnes M, Newman J, Knops A, Sullivan H. 2003. Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration. 81(2):379–399. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00352
  • Barnes M, Prior D. 2007. Conceptualising connectedness: implications for policy and practice. Social Policy and Society. 6(2):199–208. doi: 10.1017/S1474746406003460
  • Bishop P, Davis G. 2002. Mapping public participation in policy choices. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 61(1):14–29. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.00255
  • Bochel C, Bochel H, Somerville P, Worley C. 2008. Marginalised or enabled voices? ‘User participation’ in policy and practice. Social Policy and Society. 7(2):201–210. doi: 10.1017/S1474746407004150
  • Braun V, Clarke V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
  • Carpentier N, Cammaerts B. 2006. Hegemony democracy agonism and journalism. Journalism Studies. 7(6):964–975. doi: 10.1080/14616700600980728
  • Controller and Auditor-General. 2013. Immigration New Zealand: supporting new migrants to settle and work. Wellington, New Zealand: Report of the Controller and Auditor General.
  • Dryzek JS, Niemeyer S. 2006. Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science. 50(3):634–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
  • Fraser N. 1997. Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. New York: Routledge.
  • Fraser N. 2010. Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Fraser RM. 2011. Redistribution and recognition for migrants and refugees in Aotearoa New Zealand: neo-liberal and multicultural discourses in NGO claims-talk [master of social sciences (MSocSc) thesis]. Hamilton: University of Waikato.
  • Fung A. 2003. Survey article: recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy. 11(3):338–367. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00181
  • Gee S. 2017 April 17. Changes to resource management Act give ministers power to overrule councils. New Zealand Herald. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/91458493/changes-to-resource-management-act-give-ministers-power-to-overrule-councils.
  • Goodin RE, Dryzek JS. 2006. Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society. 34:219–244. doi: 10.1177/0032329206288152
  • Innes JE, Booher DE. 2004. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice. 5(4):419–436. doi: 10.1080/1464935042000293170
  • Joffe H, Yardley L. 2004. Content and thematic analysis. In: Marks D, Yardley L, editors. Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: Sage; p. 56–68.
  • Kingdon JW. 1984. Agendas alternatives and public policies. Boston (MA): Little Brown.
  • Kooiman J. 2008. Governability: a conceptual exploration. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 10(2):171–190. doi: 10.1080/13876980802028107
  • Kukutai T, Rata A. 2017. From mainstream to Manaaki: indigenising our approach to immigration. In: Hall D, editor. Fair borders? Migration policy in the twenty-first century. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books; p. 26–44.
  • Levine HB. 2009. Tackling the effects of neoliberalism? Integrating services at Barnados New Zealand. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 39:172–182.
  • Levitas R. 2005. The inclusive society? Social exclusion and new labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lovenduski J. 2008. State feminism and women's movements. West European Politics. 31(1-2):169–194. doi: 10.1080/01402380701834978
  • Lowry A, Simon-Kumar R. 2017. The paradoxes of Māori-state inclusion: the case study of the Ōhiwa harbour strategy. Political Science. 69(3):195–213. doi: 10.1080/00323187.2017.1383855
  • Mouffe C. 2014. By way of a postscript. Parallax. 20(2):149–157. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.896562
  • Newman J, Barnes M, Sullivan H, Knops A. 2004. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy. 33(2):203–223. doi: 10.1017/S0047279403007499
  • Niemeyer S. 2011. The emancipatory effect of deliberation: empirical lessons from mini-publics. Politics & Society. 39(1):103–140. doi: 10.1177/0032329210395000
  • Palacios MJ. 2016. Equality and diversity in democracy: how can we democratize inclusively? Equality diversity and inclusion. An International Journal. 35(5/6):350–363.
  • Pateman C. 2012. Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics. 10(1):7–19. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004877
  • Quick KS, Bryson D. 2016. Public participation. In: Ansell C, Torfing J, editors. The handbook of theories of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 158–169.
  • Quick KS, Feldman MS. 2011. Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 31(3):272–290. doi: 10.1177/0739456X11410979
  • Roberts N. 2004. Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration. 34(4):315–353. doi: 10.1177/0275074004269288
  • Sakofsky M, Cooney L. 2017. Overview paper on the state of volunteering in New Zealand report from the volunteer reference group. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.
  • Salter J, Laing D, Hill M. 2016. The statutory framework of New Zealand’s local government sector: is the key legislation working properly. Auckland and Wellington: Report of Simpson Grierson Barristors and Solicitors.
  • Scott P, Boyd R. 2017. Interagency performance targets: a case study of New Zealand’s results programme. Washington (DC): The IBM Centre for the Business of Government Collaborating across Boundaries Series.
  • Simon-Kumar R. 2011. The analytics of ‘gendering’ the post-neoliberal state social politics. International Studies in Gender State & Society. 18(3):441–468.
  • Simon-Kumar R. 2014. Difference and diversity in Aotearoa/New Zealand: post-neoliberal constructions of the ideal ethnic citizen. Ethnicities. 14(1):136–159. doi: 10.1177/1468796812466374
  • Simon-Kumar R, Kingfisher C. 2011. Beyond transformation and regulation: productive tensions and the analytics of inclusion. Politics & Policy. 39(2):271–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00291.x
  • Simon-Kumar R, Kingfisher C. 2015. Situated meaning frameworks in ethnic policy communities: translating ‘engagement’ in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Critical Policy Studies. 9(2):177–197. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.986493
  • Simon-Kumar R. 2016. The paradoxes of deliberation: Te Ohaakii a Hine – National Network Ending Sexual Violence Together TOAH-NNEST and the taskforce for action on sexual violence 2007–2009. Political Science. 68(1):36–54. doi: 10.1177/0032318716638561
  • Simon-Kumar R. 2018. Translating inclusion into influence in New Zealand: the conundrum of engaging gender organisations in public policy. Women Politics and Policy. 39(2):151–176. doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2018.1449525
  • Smith P. 2016. New Zealand passport holder’ versus ‘New Zealander’? The marginalization of ethnic minorities in the news – a New Zealand case study. Journalism. 17(6):694–710. doi: 10.1177/1464884915582357
  • Statistics New Zealand. 2015. Non-profit institutions satellite account: 2013. www.stats.govt.nz.
  • Tambakaki P. 2014. The tasks of agonism and agonism to the task: introducing ‘Chantal Mouffe: agonism and the politics of passion’. Parallax. 20(2):1–13. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.896543
  • Ward C, Liu J. 2012. Ethno-cultural conflict in Aotearoa/New Zealand: balancing indigenous rights and multicultural responsibilities. In: Landis D, Albert RD, editors. Handbook of ethnic conflict. New York: Springer Books; p. 45–69.
  • Young IM. 2004. Situated knowledges and democratic discussions. In: Andersen J, Siim B, editors. The politics of inclusion and empowerment: gender class and citizenship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 19–35.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.