Research and development absorptive capacity: a Māori perspective

References

• Arksey H, O'Malley L. 2005. Scoping Studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Balawag G. 2016. Interventions of the Indigenous Peoples Major Group at the 2016 meeting of the HLPF on Sustainable Development. [accessed 2018 Jan 22). http://tebtebba.org/index.php/content/369-intervention-of-the-indigenous-major-group-at-the-2015-meeting-of-the-hlpf.
   Google Scholar
• Barcham M. 2012. Thinking about Māori development in terms of the capability approach: the shift towards the adoption of the Māori potential approach. In: F. Panzironi, K. Gelber, editor. The capability approach: development practise and public policy in the Asia-Pacific region. Oxford: Routledge; p. 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bartling S, Friesike S. 2014. Opening science. The Evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter J. 2015. Overview of Māori health workforce development. University of Otago. (accessed 2018 Aug 04). https://www.otago.ac.nz/healthsystems/otago106234.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Belderbos R, Gilsing VA, Suzuki S. 2016. Direct and mediated ties to universities:’Scientific’ absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Organization. 14(1):32–52. doi: 10.1177/1476127015604734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger F. 1982. The concept of absorptive capacity: origins, content and practical relevant. Intereconomics. 17(3):133–137. doi: 10.1007/BF02927883
   Google Scholar
• [BERL] Business and Economic Research Limited. 2010. Report to: Universities NZ Human Resources Committee Steering Group. Academic workforce planning - towards 2020. Berl, Wellington: (accessed 2016 June 15). https://www.universitiesnz.ac.nz/files/Academic_Workforce_Planning_Towards_2020_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BERL. 2011. The Māori economy, science and innovation. Wellington: Berl. (accessed 2014 Oct 10). http://berl.co.nz/assets/Economic-Insights/Economic-Development/Māori-Economy/BERL-2011-Mori-Economy-Science-and-Innovation-Scenarios.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Social Innovation. 2003. Social Innovations. (accessed 2018 Feb 8). http://socialinnovation.ca/about/social-innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H. 2003. Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Brunswicker S. 2014. A fad or a phenomenon? The adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Research-Technology Management. 57(2):16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(1):128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis E, Reid P. 2013. Indigenous health workforce development: challenges and successes of the vision 20:20 programme. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 83:49–54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallenbach U, Davenport S, Ruckstuhl K. 2017. Developing absorptive capacity for midstream science in open innovation contexts. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 15(4):447–462. doi:10.1504/IJTTC.2017.10010844
   Google Scholar
• Durie M. 2001. Te mana, te kāwanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frawley J. 2017. Indigenous Knowledges, graduate attributes and recognition of prior learning for advanced standing: tensions within the academy. In: J. Frawley, S. Larkin, J. A. Smith, editor. Indigenous pathways, transitions and participation in higher education: from policy to practice. Singapore: Springer Open; p. 65–80. (accessed 2018 Mar 3). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-10-4062-7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Friesike S, Widenmayer B, Gassman O, Schildhauer T. 2015. Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 40(4):581–601. doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geib C. 2017. How Much Should Expectation Drive Science? Dark Matter.  (accessed 2018 Mar 19). http://cosmos.nautil.us/short/161/how-much-should-expectation-drive-science.
   Google Scholar
• Hall G, Patrinos HA, editors. 2012. Indigenous peoples, poverty, and development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding S. 2011. Possible pathways moving forward. In: S. Harding, editor. The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press; p. 365–373.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan L. 2013. Absorptive capacity for global fund grants: Lessons for the international community [PhD], University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill NC. (accessed 2015 July 16). https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:eb336f51-793a-42fc-95c9-8c6ee45ebae2.
   Google Scholar
• Hurihanganui TA. 2018. Maori academics ‘isolated’ and lacking in numbers [Press release]. (accessed 2019 Jan 28). https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/366304/maori-academics-isolated-and-lacking-in-numbers.
   Google Scholar
• IPENZ. 2010. Minority groups in engineering education. Wellington: Institution of Professional Engineers. (accessed 2018 July 12). http://www.ipenz.org.nz/ipenz/education_career/Report_Minority_Groups_in_Engineering.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jahnke HT, Te Wiata I. 2016. Barriers and enablers to innovation and participation by Maori in Tertiary Education. Palmerston North, New Zealand. (accessed January 28 2019). https://productivity.govt.nz/sites/default/files/sub-new-models-of-tertiary-education-99-te-mata-o-te-tau-massey-university-788Kb_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones R, Pitama S, Huria T, Poole P, McKimm J, Pinnock R, Reid P. 2010. Medical education to improve Māori health. New Zealand Medical Journal. 123(1316):113–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenny S, Clarke M. 2010. Challenging capacity building: comparative perspectives. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kidman F, Chu C, Fernandez S, Abella I. 2015. Maori Scholars and the University Final Report. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ. (accessed 2019 Jan 29). http://www.maramatanga.co.nz/sites/default/files/project-reports/Kidman%20Chu%20Fernandez%20Abella-%20Maori%20Scholars%20Final%20report%202015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev G, Bund E, Mildenberger G. 2014. Measuring what matters - indicators of social Innovativeness on the national level. Information Systems Management. 31(3):200–224. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb R. 2013. Measuring absorptive capacity: a new framework for measuring constraints. Washington (DC) USA: Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). (accessed 2015 April 10). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08a1140f0b649740003dc/61052-MAC-policy-brief-v005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Lubatkin M. 1998. Relative absorptive capcity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. 19(5):461–477. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. 2010. Scoping Studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 5(69):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas C, Ferreira JJ, Marques C. 2018. University–industry cooperation: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Science and Public Policy. scy003. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy003. (accessed 2018 Jun 20).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller K, McAdam R, Moffett S, Alexander A, Puthusserry P. 2016. Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management. 46(2):383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MBIE] Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment. 2016. Science & Innovation System Performance Report. MBIE, Wellington. (accessed 2018 Mar 15). http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/science-innovation/research-and-data/pdf-library/2016-science-and-innovation-system-performance-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Research Science and Technology. 2005. Vision Matauranga. Wellington: MBIE. (accessed 2016 Mar 17). http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/science-innovation//pdf-library/vm-booklet.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• [MoE] Ministry of Education. 2013. Ka Hikitia - Managing for success: The Māori Education Strategy 2008–2012. Wellington: MBIE. (accessed 2017 Aug 10). https://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/overall-strategies-and-policies/the-Māori-education-strategy-ka-hikitia-accelerating-success-20132017/history/ka-hikitia-managing-for-success-2008-2012/.
   Google Scholar
• MoE. 2017a. What are they doing? The field of study of domestic students/learners. Wellington: MBIE. (accessed 2018 Feb 08). https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz.
   Google Scholar
• MoE. 2017b. What did they do? The field study of domestic graduates 2008–2016. Wellington: MBIE. (accessed 2018 Feb 08). https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review. 23(2):242–266. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norgrove A, Scott D. 2017. How does New Zealand’s education system compare? OECD’s education at a Glance 2017. Wellington: MoE. (accessed 2018 July 30). https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/ … /schooling/how-does-new-zealands-education.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien KR, Scheffer M, van Nes EH, Van der Lee R. 2015. How to break the cycle of low workforce diversity: A model for change. PloS one. 10(7):e0133208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 1997. National innovation systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. (accessed 2017 March 12). http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015a. Innovation Strategy: An Agenda for policy Actions. Paris: OECD Publishing. (accessed 2017 Apr 20). https://www.oecd.org/innovation/OECD-Innovation-Strategy-2015-CMIN2015-7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015b. Science, technology and industry scoreboard 2015: innovation for growth and society. Paris: OECD Publishing. (accessed 2017 Apr 20). http://www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. OECD economic surveys. New Zealand, Paris: OECD Publishing. (accessed 2018 Apr 12). https://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/New%20Zealand-2017-OECD-economic%20survey-overview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Auditor General. 2016. Summary of our education for Māori reports. Wellington: Office of the Auditor General. (accessed 2018 Jun 10). www.oag.govt.nz.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann M. 2007. University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 9(4):259–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. 2017. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 29(1):12–16. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. 1967. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Potter H, Cooper L. 2016. Project Whitestreaming: a report on the generalising of Māori specialist staff positions in the tertiary education sector. Wellington: TEU.  (accessed 2018 Jul 22). http://teu.ac.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20160314-Project-Whitestreaming-Report-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Richardson K, Clark Z, Gaines M, Kingi H, Miller S, Pearson W, Richardson L, Schinske, J. 2018. Awhina Revolution: a Bayesian analysis of undergraduate and postgraduate completion rates from a program for Māori and Pacific success in STEM disciplines. CBE Life Sciences Education. 17( ar15):1–13. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-07-0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel HW, Webber M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences. 4(2):155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SfTI] Science for Technological Innovation. 2015a. Enhance the capacity of New Zealand to use physical and engineering sciences for economic growth. Wellington: SfTI.
   Google Scholar
• SfTI. 2015b. Science for technological innovation proposal. Proposal to MBIE. Wellington: SfTI.
   Google Scholar
• Scott C. 2011. Science for the west, myth for the rest? The case of James Bay Cree knowledge construction. In: S. Harding, editor. The Postcolonial science and technology Studies Reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press; p. 175–197.
   Google Scholar
• Tacke O. 2010. Open science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and web 2.0. In: T. J. Bastiaens, U. Baumol, B. J. Kramer, editor. On collective intelligence. Berlin: Springer; p. 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Te Puni Kokiri. 2007. Annual report for the year ended 30 June 2007: Māori potential approach. Wellington: TPK. (accessed 2017 Jun 8). https://www.tpk.govt.nz/en/a-matou-mohiotanga/corporate-documents/tpk=annualreport-2007/online/4.
   Google Scholar
• Te Puni Kokiri. 2013. He kai kei aku ringa – The Crown-Māori economic growth Partnership. Wellington: TPK. (accessed 2017 Aug 8). https://www.tpk.govt.nz/en/a-matou-mohiotanga/business-and-economics/he-kai-kei-aku-ringa-the-crownMāori-economic-growth.
   Google Scholar
• [TEC] Tertiary Education Commission. 2012. 2012 tertiary education performance report. Wellington: TEC. (accessed 2016 Oct 14). http://pr2012.publications.tec.govt.nz/uploads/TEC-Tertiary-Education-Performance-Report-2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TEC. 2013. Performance-based research fund evaluating research excellence – the 2012 assessment final report. Wellington: TEC. (accessed 2017 November 10). http://www.tec.govt.nz/assets/Reports/PBRF-QE-2012-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Theodore R, Gollop M, Tustin K, Taylor N, Kiro C, Taumoepeau M, Kokaua J, Hunter J, Poulton R. 2017. Māori University success: what helps and hinders qualification completion. AlterNative. 13(2):122–130. doi: 10.1177/1177180117700799
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2009. State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. (accessed 2017 Nov 15). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP/en/SOWIP_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vrande V, De Jong J, Vanhaverbeke W, De Rochemont M. 2009. Open innovation in SMEs: trends motives and management challenges. Technovation. 29(6):423–437. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker R. 1990. Ka Whawhai Tonu Mātou: struggle without end. Auckland: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar