Engaging young people in science education through socioscientific issues of biosecurity

References

• Avery H, Hoxhallari I. 2017. From policy to practice: Roma education in Albania and Sweden. The Urban Review. 49(3):463–477. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0394-5
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, BB. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique. 2nd ed. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bewsell D, Bigsby H, Cullen R. 2012. Using involvement to understand individual responses to an issue: the case of New Zealand biosecurity. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(1):73–88. doi: 10.1080/00288233.2011.647354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair JJ. 2017. Settler indigeneity and the eradication of the non-native: self-determination and biosecurity in the Falkland Islands (Malvinas). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 23(3):580–602. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.12653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Clark JL. 2015. Uncharismatic invasives. Environmental Humanities. 6(1):29–52. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3615889
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff J, Comaroff L. 2001. Naturing the nation: aliens, apocalypse and the postcolonial state. Journal of Southern African Studies. 27(3):627–651. doi: 10.1080/13632430120074626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson V. 2015. Western Australian high school students’ understandings about the socioscientific issue of climate change. International Journal of Science Education. 37(7):1024–1043. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1015181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J. 1916/1997. Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York (NY): The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driver R, Newton P, Osborne J. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education. 84:287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Counts. 2019. Science achievement: what we know from New Zealand's participation in TIMSS 2014/15 and PISA 2015. [Internet]. [accessed 2019 June]. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2543/pisa-2015/science-achievement-what-we-know-from-nzs-participation-in-timss-2014-15-and-pisa-2015
   Google Scholar
• Elliott R, Timulak L. 2005. Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In: Miles J, Gilbert P, editors. A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: Oxford University Press; p. 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein S. 1993. Emotion and self-theory. In: Lewis M, Haviland J, editors. Handbook of emotions. New York (NY): Guilford Press; pp.313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser ED, Dougill AJ, Mabee WE, Reed M, McAlpine P. 2006. Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of environmental management. 78(2):114–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Parr AK, Amemiya JL, Wang MT, Brauer S. 2019. What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research. 0743558419830638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardener L. 2007. What role does a poster play? [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan]. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2007/oct/26/whatkindofroledoesaposte
   Google Scholar
• Guy N. 2016. Biosecurity should be taught in schools. http://fieldnotes.co.nz/biosecurity/nathan-guy-biosecurity-should-be-taught-in-schools/
   Google Scholar
• Hay I, Thomas SM. 1999. Making sense with posters in biological science education. Journal of Biological Education. (4):209–214. doi: 10.1080/00219266.1999.9655668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe S, Bingham N. 2008. Securing life: the emerging practices of biosecurity. Environment and Planning A. 40(7):1534–1551. doi: 10.1068/a4054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson D. 2008. Towards scientific literacy: a teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson D. 2011. Looking to the future: building a curriculum for social activism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha C, Lessinger EM. 2017. Indispensable and very much alive: posters in German election campaigns. In: Holtz-Bacha C, Johansson B, editors. Election posters around the globe. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kauri dieback. 2018. Save our kauri forests. [Internet]. [accessed 2018 Feb 19]. https://www.kauridieback.co.nz/media/1750/kd012-2018-kauri-dieback-a3-posters-english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman ML, Sadler TD. 2010. Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education. 32(8):1017–1043. doi: 10.1080/09500690902894512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson R. 2010. Science education and democratic participation: an uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education. 46(1):69–119. doi: 10.1080/03057260903562433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ZX, Grady C, Moscovitch M. 2017. Effects of prior-knowledge on brain activation and connectivity during associative memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex. 27(3):1991–2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett SJ, Duchatel F, Digard P. 2019. A brief history of bird flu. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 374(1775): 20180257. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May S, Cowles S, Lamy M. 2013. PISA 2012 New Zealand summary report. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/PISA/pisa-2012/pisa-2012-new-zealand-summary-report
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Primary Industries. 2015. Biosecurity New Zealand: Queensland fruit fly. [Internet]. [accessed 2017 Feb 19]. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/protection-and-response/responding/alerts/queensland-fruit-fly/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Primary Industries. 2016. Biosecurity 2025: Direction Statement. [Internet]. [accessed 2017 Feb 19]. file:///C:/Users/R.RRam/Downloads/Biosecurity-2025-Direction-Statement-2016-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Primary Industries. 2017. Biosecurity Act 1993. [Internet]. [accessed 2017 Feb 19]. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/biosec/pol/bio-act
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Primary Industries. 2018a. Biosecurity. [Internet]. [accessed 2018 March 11]. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/law-and-policy/legal-overviews/biosecurity /
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Primary Industries. 2018b. Biosecurity New Zealand: Check, Clean and Dry. [Internet]. [accessed 2018 Feb 19]. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/travel-and-recreation/outdoor-activities/check-clean-dry /
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin D, Thompson J. 1995. Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environment and urbanization. 7(1):231–250. doi: 10.1177/095624789500700113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje EB, Ciechanowski KM, Kramer K, Ellis L, Carrillo R, Collazo T. 2004. Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly. 39:38–70. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman WL. 2003. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston (MA): Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Trade and Enterprise. 2018. Investment statistics. [Internet]. [accessed 2018 Feb 19]. https://www.nzte.govt.nz/investment-and-funding/investment-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Perrottet A. 2016. Fiji's exporters say Australia's biosecurity changes ‘overdue’. [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan 13]. https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/314206/fiji's-exporters-say-australia's-biosecurity-changes-'overdue’
   Google Scholar
• Potter C. 2013. The WTO, free trade and the governance of plant health. In: Dobson A, Barker K, Taylor SL, editors. Biosecurity: the socio-politics of invasive species and infectious diseases. London: Routledge; p. 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Predator Free NZ. 2018. Predator Free 2050. [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan]. https://predatorfreenz.org/about-us/pf-2050/
   Google Scholar
• Ram R. 2019. No country for possums: young people’s nativist views. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. 35(1):12–27. doi: 10.1017/aee.2018.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram R, France B, Birdsall S. 2016. Why biosecurity matters: students’ knowledge of biosecurity and implications for future engagement with biosecurity initiatives. Research in Science & Technological Education. 34(1):69–84. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2015.1066324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [RNZ] Radio New Zealand. 2015. Fiji says NZ biosecurity suspension off. [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan 13]. https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/281343/fiji-says-nz-biosecurity-suspension-off
   Google Scholar
• Sadler TD. 2004. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: a critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41:513–536. doi: 10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler TD. 2011. Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In: Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler TD, Chambers FW, Zeidler DL. 2004. Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education. 26(4):387–409. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler TD, Zeidler DL. 2005. The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education. 89(1):71–93. doi: 10.1002/sce.20023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler TD, Zeidler DL. 2009. Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 46:909–921. doi: 10.1002/tea.20327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safe for Animals. 2019. About 1080 poison. [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan]. https://www.safe.org.nz/about-1080-poison
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat Pacific Community. 2011. Facilitating agricultural commodity trade: what’s holding Pacific island taro exports back? [Internet]. [accessed 2016 Nov 20]. http://www.spc.int/lrd/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=793:whats-holding-pacific-island-taro-exports-back&Itemid=95
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Anderson CW. 2007. Recontextualization of science from lab to school: implications for science literacy. Science & Education. 18: 1253–1275. doi: 10.1007/s11191-007-9112-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheley RL, Jacobs JS, Floyd JW. 1996. Noxious weed survey: awareness and attitudes in Montana. Weed technology. 10(3):592–598. doi: 10.1017/S0890037X00040495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonneaux L. 2014. From promoting the techno-sciences to activism – a variety of objectives involved in the teaching of SSIs. In: Activist science and technology education. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth J, McInerney P, Fish T. 2013. Blurring the boundaries: from relational learning towards a critical pedagogy of engagement for disengaged disadvantaged young people. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. 21(2):299–320. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.759136
   Google Scholar
• SPSS Software. 2017. Predictive analytic software and solutions. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam B. 2001. The aliens have landed! Reflections on the rhetoric of biological invasions. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism. 2(1):26–40. doi: 10.1215/15366936-2.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Talbot D, Hayes D. 2016. Teachers’experiences of re-engaging disenfranchised young people in learning through inquiry-based pedagogies: a phenomenographic study. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies. 7(2):257–274. doi: 10.18357/ijcyfs72201615721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas L, Ritchie SM. 2012. Positive emotional responses to hybridised writing about a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education. 42(1):25–49. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9255-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JH. 2007. Human emotions: a sociological theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace CS. 2004. Framing new research in literacy and science use: authenticity, multiple discourses and the “third space”. Science Education. 88:901–914. doi: 10.1002/sce.20024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren CR. 2007. Perspectives on the 'alien' versus 'native' species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography. 31(4):427–446. doi: 10.1177/0309132507079499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelahan L. 2010. Why knowledge matters in curriculum: a social realist argument. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young M. 2008. From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of Research in Education. 32:1–28. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07308969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler DL, Keefer M. 2003. The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 7–38.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou D, Song H, Wang J, Li Z, Xu S, Ji X, Xu J. 2019. Biosafety and biosecurity. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. 1(1):15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jobb.2019.01.001
   Google Scholar