Iwi community justice panels reduce harm from re-offending

References

• Akroyd S, Paulin J, Paipa K, Wehipeihana N. 2016. Iwi panels: an evaluation of their implementation and operation at Hutt Valley, Gisborne and Manukau from 2014 to 2015. Wellington: Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Police, Department of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2018. ANZSOC codes; [accessed 2018 July 6]. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/1234.0.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckman O, Estrada F, Nilsson A, Shannon D. 2014. The life course of young male and female offenders – stability or change between different birth cohorts? British Journal of Criminology. 54(3):393–410. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azu007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard J, Cooper M, Bergseth K. 2017. The effectiveness of various restorative justice interventions on recidivism outcomes among juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. 15(4):465–480. doi: 10.1177/1541204016647428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J. 2016. Restorative justice and responsive regulation: the question of evidence. (No. 51). Available from Australian National University website: http://regnet.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/uploads/2016-10/SSRN_2016_updated_Braithwaite%20J.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Broad H. 2007. Restorative policing. In: G. Maxwell, J. Liu. editors. Restorative justice and practices in New Zealand: towards a restorative society. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies. p. 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys. 22(1):31–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis-Ham S, Walton D. 2017. The New Zealand crime harm index: quantifying harm using sentencing data. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. 12(4):455–467. doi: 10.1093/police/pax050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly K. 2002. Restorative justice: the real story. Punishment & Society. 4(1):55–79. doi:10.1177/14624740222228464.
   Google Scholar
• Eck J. 2003. Police problems: the complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation. Crime Prevention Studies. 15:79–114.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington DP, Coid JW, Murray J. 2009 Family factors in the intergenerational transmission of offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 19(2):109–124. doi:10.1002/cbm.717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington DP, Welsh BC. 2005. Randomized experiments in criminology: what have we learned in the last two decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology. 1(1):9–38. doi:10.1007/s11292-004-6460-0.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Swain-Campbell N. 2003. Ethnicity and criminal convictions: results of a 21-year longitudinal study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 36(3):354–367. doi: 10.1375/acri.36.3.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gałecki A, Burzykowski T. 2013. Linear mixed-effects model. In: A. Gałecki, T. Burzykowski, editors. Linear mixed-effects models using R: a step-by-step approach. p. 245–273. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3900-4_13.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, Roza K, Meier DE, Morrison RS, Aldridge MD. 2014. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Services Research. 49(5):1701–1720. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes T. 2016. Restorative justice: evidence brief. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe D, Farrington DP, Piquero AR, Loeber R, Hill KG. 2017. Systematic review of early risk factors for life-course-persistent, adolescence-limited, and late-onset offenders in prospective longitudinal studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 33:15–23. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ka'ai TM, Moorfield JC, Reilly MJP, Mosely S, editors. 2004. Ki te Whaiao: an introduction to Māori culture and society. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer J, Dowden C, Muise D. 2005. The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: a meta-analysis. The Prison Journal. 85(2):127–144. doi: 10.1177/0032885505276969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschied A, Chiodo D, Nowicki E, Rodger S. 2008. Childhood predictors of adult criminality: a meta-analysis drawn from the prospective longitudinal literature. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice. 50(4):435–467. doi:10.3138/cjccj.50.4.435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie D. 2010. Maori and criminal offending: a critical appraisal. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 43(2):282–300. doi: 10.1375/acri.43.2.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell G. 2004. Achieving effective outcomes in youth justice final report. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Nash S. 2018. Crown-Maori efforts to reduce reoffending. [accessed 2018 December 6]. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/crown-maori-efforts-reduce-reoffending.
   Google Scholar
• Owens V. 2001. Whanake Rangatahi: programmes and services to address Maori youth offending. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 16:175–190.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rausch S. 1983. Court processing versus diversion of Status offenders: a test of deterrence and labeling theories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 20(1):39–54. doi:10.1177/002242788302000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapland J, Atkinson A, Atkinson H, Dignan J, Edwards L, Hibbert J, Sorsby A. 2008. Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. . Ministry of Justice Research Series. 10(8).
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd SM, Ilalio T. 2016. Maori and Pacific Islander overrepresentation in the Australian criminal justice system – what are the determinants? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 55(2):113–128. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2015.1124959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman LW, Strang H, Mayo-Wilson E, Woods DJ, Ariel B. 2015. Are restorative justice conferences effective in reducing repeat offending? Findings from a Campbell systematic review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 31(1):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s10940-014-9222-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spier P, Wilkinson R. 2016. Reoffending patterns for participants of youth justice Family Group Conferences held in 2011 and 2012. https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/research/child-and-youth-offending-patterns/reoffending-patterns-for-court-ordered-and-itc-fgcs-for-sept-2016-publication.docx.
   Google Scholar
• Strang H, Sherman LW, Mayo-Wilson E, Woods D, Ariel B, Strang H. 2013. Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) using face-to-face meetings of offenders and victims: effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction. A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 12. doi: 10.4073/csr.2013.12
   Google Scholar
• UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2006. Handbook on restorative justice programmes; p. 114. Available from United Nations website: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/Handbook_on_Restorative_Justice_Programmes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wood WR. 2015. Soliciting community involvement and support for restorative justice through community service. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 26(2):131–155. doi: 10.1177/0887403413499580
   Google Scholar
• Workman K. 2007. Resolving conflict and restoring relationships: experiments in community justice within a New Zealand faith-based prison. In: G Maxwell, J Liu, editors. Restorative justice and practices in New Zealand: towards a restorative society. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies; p. 139–161.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr H. 2015. The little book of restorative justice: revised and updated. New York: Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar