Contracting public health and social services: insights from complexity theory for Aotearoa New Zealand

References

• Alford J, O’Flynn J. 2012. Rethinking public service delivery: managing with external providers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer H. 1954. What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review. 19(1):3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth A, Wright J, Briscoe S. 2018. Scoping and searching to support realist approaches. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editor. Doing realist research. London: Sage; p. 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Boston J, editors. 1995. The state under contract. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boston J, Gill D, editors. 2017. Social investment: A New Zealand policy experiment. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton A, Gifford H, Allport T, Research W, White H. 2018. Delivering on diversity: the challenges of commissioning for Whānau Ora. Journal of Indigenous Wellbeing. 3(1):45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Callaghan G. 2014. Complexity theory and the social sciences: the state of the art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney P. 2012. Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review. 10(3):346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney P, Geyer R. 2017. A critical discussion of complexity theory: how does ‘complexity thinking’ improve our understanding of politics and policy making. Complexity, Governance & Networks. 3(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Came H, Doole C, McKenna B, McCreanor T. 2018. Institutional racism in public health contracting: findings of a nationwide survey from New Zealand. Social Science and Medicine. 199:132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capra F, Luisi PL. 2014. The systems view of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani B, Hafferty FW. 2009. Sociology and complexity science: a new field of inquiry. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler J, Rycroft-Malone J, Hawkes C, Noyes J. 2016. Application of simplified complexity theory concepts for healthcare social systems to explain the implementation of evidence into practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 72(2):461–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex system. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Considine M, Nguyen P, O’Sullivan S. 2018. New public management and the rule of economic incentives: Australian welfare-to-work from job market signalling perspective. Public Management Review. 20(8):1186–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming J. 2016. Commissioning in New Zealand: learning from the past and present. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 22(1):34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer J, Boulton A, Lavoie J, Tenbensel T, Cumming J. 2013. Indigenous peoples’ health care: new approaches to contracting and accountability at the public administration frontier. Public Management Review. 16:1091–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppel E, Karacaoglu G. 2017. Social investment in a complex and radically uncertain world. In: Boston J, Gill D, editor. Social investment: A New Zealand policy experiment. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books; p. 380–406.
   Google Scholar
• Eppel E, Matheson A, Walton M. 2011. Applying complexity theory to New Zealand public policy principles for practice. Policy Quarterly. 7(1):48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Eppel E, Rhodes ML. 2018. Complexity theory and public management: a ‘becoming’ field. Public Management Review. 20(7):949–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppel E, Turner D, Wolf A. 2011. Complex policy implementation: the role of experimentation and learning. In: Ryan B, Gill D, editor. Future state: directions for public management in New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press; p. 182–212.
   Google Scholar
• Gear C, Eppel E, Kaziol-McLain J. 2017. Utilizing complexity theory to explore sustainable responses to intimate partner violence in health care. Public Management Review. 20(7):1052–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gear C, Eppel E, Kaziol-Mclain J. 2018. Exploring the complex pathway of the primary healthcare response to intimate partner violence. Health Research Policy and Systems. 16(1):99. doi:10.1186/s12961-018- 0373-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geyer R, Cairney P, editors. 2015. Handbook on complexity and public policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin S, Stears M, Riboldi M, Fishwick E, Fennis L. 2020. All together: a new future for commissioning human services in New South Wales. Sydney: Sydney Policy Lab, University of Sydney. [accessed 2020 August 30]. https://www.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/corporate/documents/sydney-policy-lab/sydney-policy-lab—all-together—july-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer M. 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences. 36(2):175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes P. 2015. Managing complexity in the public services, 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Head BW, Alford J. 2015. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society. 47(6):711–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh S, Shiell A, Hawe P, Garvey K. 2020. Resources, relationships, and systems thinking should inform the way community health promotion is funded. Critical Public Health. [accessed 2020 August 30]:[11p.]. doi:10.1080/09581596.2020.1813255.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn E, Koppenjan J. 2014. Complexity in governance network theory. Complexity, Governance & Networks. 1(1):61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Knight AD, Lowe T, Brossard M, Wilson J. 2017. A whole new world: funding and commissioning in complexity. [accessed 2020 August 30]. http://wordpress.collaboratei.com/wp-content/uploads/A-Whole-New-World-Funding-Commissioning-in-Complexity.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS, Hacking I. 2012. The structure of scientific revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie J, Boulton A, Dwyer J. 2010. Analysing contractual environments: lessons from Indigenous health in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Public Administration. 88(3):665–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell SA, Kearns RA, Prince R. 2014. Neoliberalism and the contract state: exploring innovation and resistance among New Zealand health promoters. Critical Public Health. 24(3):308–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe T, Plimmer D. 2019. Exploring the new world: practical insights for funding, commissioning and managing in complexity. [accessed 2020 August 30]. http://wordpress.collaboratei.com/wp-content/uploads/1.-Exploring-the-New-World-Report-MAIN-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Massey University. 2017. Code of ethical conduct for research, teaching and evaluations involving human participants: Revised code 2017. [accessed 2020 August 30]. http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/fms/Human%20Ethics/Documents/MUHEC%20Code.pdf?2F3CBE296DD2345CC01794BF9CFCA13A.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson A, Walton M, Gray R, Wehipeihana N, Wistow J. 2019. Strengthening prevention in communities through systems change: lessons from the evaluation of Healthy Families NZ. Health Promotion International. [accessed 2020 August 30]. [11 p.]. doi:10.1093/heapro/daz092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows D. 2008. Thinking in systems: a primer. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell M. 2009. Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morçöl G. 2012. A complexity theory for public policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muir R, Parker I. 2014. Many to many: how the relational state will transform public services. [accessed 2020 August 30]. https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2014/02/Many-to-many_Feb2014_11865.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Productivity Commission. 2015. More effective social services. [accessed 2020 August 30]. https://www.productivity.govt.nz/assets/Documents/8981330814/social-services-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Notarnicola I, Petrucci C, De Jesus Barbosa MR, Giorgi F, Stievano A, Rocco G, Lancia L. 2017. Complex adaptive systems and their relevance for nursing: an evolutionary concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 23(3):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowland-Foreman G. 2016. Crushed or just bruised? Voluntary organisations-25 years under the bear hug of government funding in Aotearoa New Zealand. Third Sector Review. 22(2):53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. 2008. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin C, Amoroso L. 2019. Constructing social research: the unity and diversity of method. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes ML, Eppel E. 2018. Public administration and complexity–or how to teach things we can’t predict? Complexity Governance & Networks. 4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes ML, Murphy J, Muir J, Murray JA. 2011. Public management and complexity theory: richer decision-making in public services. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rickles D, Hawe P, Shiell A. 2007. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 61:933–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel HW, Webber HM. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science. 4(2):155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room G. 2011. Complexity, institutions and public policy: agile decision-making in a turbulent world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbensel T. 2015. Complexity and health policy. In: Cairney P, Geyer R, editor. Handbook on complexity and public policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; p. 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbensel T. 2017. Bridging complexity theory and hierarchies, markets, networks, communities: a ‘population genetics’ framework for understanding institutional change from within. Public Management Review. 20(7):1032–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have P. 2004. Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tolich M, Davidson C, editors. 2018. Social science research in New Zealand: An introduction. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trebilcock M. 1995. Can government be reinvented? In: Boston J, editor. The state under contract. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books; p. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Trenholm S, Ferlie E. 2013. Using complexity theory to analyse the organisational response to resurgent tuberculosis across London. Social Science & Medicine. 93:229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. 2019. Hauora: report on stage one of the Health Services and Outcomes Kaupapa Inquiry. [accessed 2020 August 30]. https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_152801817/Hauora%20W.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walton M. 2014. Applying complexity theory: a review to inform evaluation design. Evaluation and Program Planning. 45:119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar