Where to for collaboration in land and water policy development in Aotearoa New Zealand? Guidance for authorising agencies

References

• Ansell C, Gash A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Pub Adm Res The. 18(4):543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird J, Plummer R, Schultz L, Armitage D, Bodin Ö. 2019. How does socio-institutional diversity affect collaborative governance of social-ecological systems in practice? Env Mgm. 63(2):200–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammer G. 2015. Change! Combining analytic approaches with street wisdom. Canberra: ANU Press. Chapter 1, An approach to understanding change; p. 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bell E, Scott T. 2020. Common institutional design, divergent results: a comparative case study of collaborative governance patterns for regional water planning. Env Sci Pol. 111(2020):63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Benson D, Jordan H, Cook H, Smith L. 2013. Collaborative environmental governance: are watershed partnerships swimming or are they sinking? L Use Pol. 30(1):458–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle J, Koontz T. 2014. Goal specificity: a proxy measure for improvement in environmental outcomes in collaborative governance. J Env Mgm. 145(2014):268–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodin Ö. 2017. Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science. 357(6352):eaan1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psy. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brisbois M, de Loë R. 2016. Power in collaborative approaches to governance for water: a systematic review. Soc Nat Res. 29(7):775–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower A. 2016. Is collaboration good for the environment? Or what’s wrong with the land and water forum? NZ J Eco. 40(3):390–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson J, Ackermann F, Eden C. 2016. Discovering collaborative advantage: The contributions of goal categories and visual strategy mapping. Pub Adm Rev. 76(6):912–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canterbury Mayoral Forum. 2009. Canterbury Water Management Strategy. Christchurch (NZ): Environment Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston D, Jäger J, Mitchell R. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Pro Nat Ac Sci USA. 100(14):8086–8091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cradock-Henry N, Greenhalgh S, Brown P, Sinner J. 2017. Factors influencing successful collaboration for freshwater management in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Eco Soc. 22(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doberstein C. 2016. Designing collaborative governance decision-making in search of a ‘collaborative advantage’. Pub Man Rev. 18(6):819–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan R, Robson-Williams M. 2018. Shaping Southland’s Regional Forum: drawing on lessons from elsewhere. Lincoln (NZ): Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. Contract Report LC3293.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson K, Nabatchi T. 2015. Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: a performance matrix. Pub Per Mgm Rev. 38(4):717–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Pub Adm Res The. 22(1):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppel E. 2013. Collaborative governance case studies: the land and water forum. Wellington, NZ: Victoria University of Wellington Institute for Governance and Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer M. 2014. Coalition structures and policy change in a consensus democracy. Policy Stud. J. 42(3):344–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote J, Midgley G, Ahuriri-Driscoll A, Hepi M, Earl-Goulet J. 2020. Systemic evaluation of community environmental management programmes. Eur J Op Res. 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester J. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraussen B, Halpin B. 2017. Think tanks and strategic policy-making: the contribution of think tanks to policy advisory systems. Pol Sci. 50(1):105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Fung A, Wright E. 2003. Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak A, Heikkila T, Lubell M. 2013. The Oxford handbook of US environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 19, The promise and performance of collaborative governance; p. 413–434.
   Google Scholar
• Gillett A, Loader K, Doherty B, Scott J. 2016. A multi-organizational cross-sectoral collaboration: empirical evidence from an ‘Empty Homes’ project. Pub Mon Mgm. 36(1):15–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman P. 2015 Nov 3. Government blamed as Fish and Game pulls out of crucial nationwide water forum. Stuff. [accessed 2020 Jul 10] Environment [2 screens]. https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/73612763/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray B. 1989. Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock F. 2018 Oct 9. An ambitious freshwater deadline. Newsroom [accessed 2020 Jul 10] Environment [3 screens]. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/10/08/269003/ambitious-freshwater-deadline.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward J. 2002. The Treaty challenge: Local government and Maori – a scoping report. Dunedin (NZ): Crown Forestry Rental Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Healey P. 1997. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Houndsmills: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila T, Gerlak A. 2005. The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Pol Stu J. 33(4): 583–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepi M, Foote J, Marino M, Rogers R, Taimona H. 2007. ‘Koe wai hoki koe?!’, or ‘Who are you?!’. Issues of trust in cross-cultural collaborative research. K NZ J Soc Sci On. 2(2):37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes S, Pincetl S. 2014. Evaluating collaborative institutions in context: the case of regional water management in southern California. Env Plan C. 32(1):20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham C, Vangen S. 2005. Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• [IAP2] International Association for Public Participation. 2020. IAP2’s Public Participation Spectrum; [accessed 2020 July 10]. https://iap2.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2018_IAP2_Spectrum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial M. 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: lessons from six watershed management programs. Adm Soc. 37(3):281–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes J, Booher D. 2010. Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes J, Connick S, Booher D. 2007. Informality as a planning strategy: collaborative water management in the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. J Am Pla Ass. 73(2):195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin R, Stansbury J. 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Pub Adm Rev. 64(1):55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager N, Newig J, Challies E, Kochskämper E. 2020. Pathways to implementation: Evidence on how participation in environmental governance impacts on environmental outcomes. J Pub Adm Theory. 30(3):383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis G, Kiparsky M, Noorgaard R. 2009. Collaborative governance and adaptive management: lessons from California’s CALFED Water Program. Env Sci Pol. 12(6):631–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter R. 1994. Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances. Har Bus Rev. 72(4):96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky M, Milman A, Owen D, Fisher A. 2017. The importance of institutional design for distributed local-level governance of groundwater: the case of California’s sustainable groundwater management act. Water. 9(10):755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz T, Steelman T, Carmin J, Korfmacher K, Moseley C, Thomas C. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: what roles for government? Washington, DC: RFF Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz T, Thomas C. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Pub Adm Rev. 66(2006):111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lahat L, Sher-Hadar N. 2019. A threefold perspective: conditions for collaborative governance. J Mgm Gov. 2020(24):117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Lane M. 2005. Public participation in planning: an intellectual history. Aus Geo. 36(3):283–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [LAWF] Land and Water Forum. 2012. Second report of the Land and Water Forum: setting limits for water quality and quantity, and freshwater policy- and plan-making through collaboration. Wellington (NZ): Land and Water Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Leach W, Sabatier P. 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge: MIT Press. Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington; p. 233–258.
   Google Scholar
• Leventon J, Schaal T, Velten S, Dänhardt J, Fischer J, Abson D, Newig J. 2017. Collaboration or fragmentation? Biodiversity management through common agricultural policy. Land Use Pol. 64(2017):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax A, Memon P, Painter B. 2010. The Canterbury Water Management Strategy as a collaborative planning initiative: a preliminary assessment. Lincoln, NZ: Lincoln Ventures.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell M, Lippert L. 2011. Integrated regional water management: a study of collaboration or water politics-as-usual in California, USA. Int Rev Adm Sci. 77(1):76–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum R. 2011. Beyond consensus. Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey M. 2000. Problems with using collaboration to shape environmental public policy. Val UL Rev. 34(1999):423–434.
   Google Scholar
• Merkhofer M, Conway R, Anderson R. 1997. Multi attribute utility analysis as a framework for public participation in siting a hazardous water management facility. Env Mgm. 21(6):831–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell C. 2017 Mar 12. Questions over Governments’ water forum, as fourth group leaves. Stuff [accessed 2020 Jul 10] [2 screens]. https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/90292326/questions-over-governments-water-forum-as-fourth-group-leaves.
   Google Scholar
• Newig J, Challies E, Jager N, Kochskämper E, Adzersen A. 2018. The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: a framework of causal mechanisms. Pol Stu J. 46(2):269–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig J, Fritsch O. 2009. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level and effective? Env Pol Gov. 19(3):197–214.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn J. 2009. The cult of collaboration in public policy. Aus J Pub Adm. 68(1):112–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österblom H, Bodin Ö. 2012. Global cooperation among diverse organizations to reduce illegal fishing in the Southern Ocean. Conserv. Biol. 26(4):638–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reily T. 2001. Collaboration in action: an uncertain process. Adm Soc Wrk. 25(1):53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M. 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier P, Leach W, Lubell M, Pelkey N. 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge: MIT Press. Theoretical frameworks explaining partnership success in Swimming upstream; p. 173–200.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon G. 2008. Governance of the rural environment: are existing approaches working? Paper presented at: Environmental Defence Society Conference; Jun 11–12; Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon G, Zilliacus K. 2007. Northern lights: could we learn collaborative governance from the Nordic countries? Ecologic. (Spring 2007):4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schuckman M. 2001. Making the hard choices: a collaborative governance model for the biodiversity context. Was ULQ. 79(2001):343–365.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman S. 2006. Creating a culture of collaboration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Scott T. 2015. Does collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. J Pol Anal Mgm. 34(3):537–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott T, Thomas C, Magallanes J. 2019. Convening for consensus: simulating stakeholder agreement in collaborative governance processes under different network conditions. J Pub Adm The. 29(1):32–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellenberger M, Nordhaus T. 2009. The death of environmentalism. Geopolit Hist Int Relations. 1(1):121–163.
   Google Scholar
• Short C, Winter M. 1999. The problem of common land: towards stakeholder governance. J Env Pln Mgm. 42(5):613–630.
   Google Scholar
• Sinner J, Brown P, Newton M. 2017. Community perceptions of collaborative processes for managing freshwater resources. Ecol Soc. 21(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind L, Cruikshank J. 1987. Breaking the impasse: consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Syed M. 2019. Rebel ideas: the power of diverse thinking. Great Britain: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Tadaki M, Sinner J, Stahlmann-Brown P, Greenhalgh S. 2020. Does collaborative governance increase public confidence in water management? Survey evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand. Wat Alt. 13(2):302–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor L, Fenemor A, Mihinui R, Sayers R, Porou T, Hikuroa D, Harcourt N, White P, O’Connor M. 2020. Ngā puna Aroha: towards an indigenous-centred freshwater allocation framework for Aotearoa New Zealand. Aust J Wat Mgm. 25(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas A. 2014. Accessing nature: the battle of the Hurunui River. PhD Thesis, Victoria University: Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Turner J, Allen W, Fraser C, Fenemor A, Horita A, White T, Chen L, Atkinson M, Rush M. 2020. Navigating institutional challenges: design to enable community participation in social learning for freshwater planning. Env Mgm. 65(3):288–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangen S, Huxham C. 2006. Achieving collaborative advantage: understanding the challenge and making it happen. Str Dir. 22:3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk I, Edelenbos J. 2014. The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: findings from survey research on urban development projects in the Netherlands. Pol Sci. 47(1):3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda E. 2002. From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Pub Adm Rev. 62(5):527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Korff Y, Daniell K, Moellenkamp S, Bots P, Bijlsma R. 2012. Implementing participatory water management: recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation. Ecol Soc. 17(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waikato Regional Council. 2018. Restoration strategy: Te Rautaki Tāmata i ngā awa o Waikato me Waipā. Hamilton: Waikato Regional Council.
   Google Scholar
• Wanna J. 2008. Collaborative governance: a new era of public policy in Australia? Canberra: ANU Press. Chapter 1, Collaborative government: meanings, dimensions, drivers and outcomes; p. 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Warner J. 2006. More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. Wat Res Dev. 22(1):15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber E. 2003. Bringing society back in: grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Weible C. 2008. Caught in a maelstrom: implementing California marine protected areas. Coa Mgm. 36(4):350–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaffee S, Wondolleck J. 2003. Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: evolution and challenges. Env: J Int Stu. 31(2):59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Young J, Jordan A, Searle K, Butler A, Chapman D, Simmons P, Watt A. 2013. Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biol Cons. 158(2013):359–370.
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson A, Lindahl K. 2013. Conflict resolution through collaboration: preconditions and limitations in forest and nature conservation controversies. For Pol Eco. 33(2013):39–46.
   Google Scholar