Friede, Freude, Pancakes? The concept of war and what is lost within the NATO allianceFootnote^†

† The views expressed in this text are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the German government, the German Ministry of Defence, the Canadian government, or the Canadian Department of National Defence.

References

• Author, “War in Afghanistan” The Canadian Encyclopedia. [Online]. Available from: http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/international-campaign-against-terrorism-inafghanistan/ [Accessed 10 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, J.C., 2009. Selling Afghanistan: a discourse analysis of Canada’s military intervention, 2001–2008. International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 64 (3), 717–733. doi: 10.1177/002070200906400308
   Google Scholar
• Boyrs, D., Review of Ian McKay and Jamie Swift’s warrior nation: Rebranding Canada in an age of anxiety, The Laurier Centre for Military, Strategic, and Disarmament Studies [Online] Available from: http://canadianmilitaryhistory.ca/review-of-warrior-nation/ [Accessed 19 August 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Breede, H.C., 2016. Summary and implications: The Will to War. In: Stéfanie von Hlatky and H. Christian Breede, eds. Going to War? Future Trends in Military Interventions. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 219–238.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, M., 2011. The Savage War: the untold battles of Afghanistan. Toronto: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Constitution Act, 1867. Section 91.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 19 November 2014. Drucksache 18/3246, “Antrag der Bundesregierung: Entsendung bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte am NATO-geführten Einsatz Resolute Support Mission für die Ausbildung, Beratung und Unterstützung der afghanischen nationalen Sicherheitskräfte in Afghanistan”.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, D., and Eidnow, J., 2002. Wittgensteins Poker: the story of a ten-minute argument between two great philosophers. New York: Harper Colllns, 90, 156.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C., 1987. Deep play: notes on the balinese cockfight. In: Paul Rabinow and William M. Sullivan (eds), Interpretive social science: a second look. Berkeley: University of California Press, 195–240.
   Google Scholar
• Globe Editorial, 14 March 2014. What Canada did and did not achieve in Afghanistan. The Globe and Mail, [Online]. Available from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/now-that-our-war-in-afghanistan-isover/article17501889/ [Accessed 10 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• zu Guttenberg, K.T., 14 March 2010. Verdruckstheit im Umgang mit dem Afghanistaneinsatz. Interview by Rolf Clement, Deutschlandfunk. [Online]. Available from: http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/verdruckstheit-im-umgang-mit-dem-afghanistaneinsatz.868.de.html?dram:article_id=124583 [Accessed 28 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Howell, A., November 2011. Afghanistan’s price. Literary Review of Canada, 19 (9), 62ff.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., and Coupland, N. (eds), 1999. The discourse reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, David, 16 October 2013. Seizing Canada’s Moment: Prosperity and Opportunity in an Uncertain World. Speech from the Throne, [online]. Available from: http://www.speech.gc.ca/eng/fullspeech [Accessed 10 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Kohler Riessman, C., 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, E., and Gross Stein, J., 2007. The unexpected war: Canada in Kandahar. Toronto: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Leuprecht, C., and Sokolsky, J., 2016. Defence policy - Walmart style: Canadian lessons in “Not-So-Grand Strategy.” In: Stéfanie von Hlatky and H. Christian Breede, eds. Going to war? Future trends in military interventions. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Leuprecht, C., and Sokolsky, J., forthcoming. Defence policy wal-mart style: Canadian lessons in not-so-grand strategy. In: Stéfanie von Hlatky and H. Christian Breede, eds. Going to war? Future trends in military intervention. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Van Loan, P., 8 February 2008. Federal government seeks to continue mission in Afghanistan. [online]. Available from: http://www.lgc.gc.ca/eng/content/federalgovernment-seeks-continue-mission-afghanistan-0 [Accessed 10 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, W.A., 31 July 2015. A new role for Canada and the US in a world of persistent menace. The Globe and Mail.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, J., Why Afghanistan? Why Canada?. 12 September 2003, online at http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/news/article.page?doc=why-afghanistan-why-canada/hnocfjei, accessed 10 September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, I., and Swift, J., 2012. Warrior nation: rebranding Canada in the age of anxiety. Toronto: Between the Lines, 270.
   Google Scholar
• Massie, J., January 2002. Regional strategic subcultures: Canadians and the use of force in Afghanistan and Iraq. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 14 (2), 19–48. doi: 10.1080/11926422.2008.9673461
   Google Scholar
• Massie, J., 2013. Canada’s war for prestige in Afghanistan: a realist paradox? International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 68, 274–288. doi: 10.1177/0020702013492500
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A., 2002. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. In: A. Michael Huberman and Matthew B. Miles (eds), The qualitative research companion. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, A., 18 December 2010. Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung: “Bundeskanzlerin Merkel in Afghanistan”. [Online]. Available from: http://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Reiseberichte/af-2010-12-18.html [Accessed 28 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, J., 1999. The study of discourse in international relations: a critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5, 225–254. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, S., 1997. Discourse. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, K., 2011. Erwartungen der Zivilgesellschaft an eine militärische Führungsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert. In: H.C. Beck and C. Singer (eds), Entscheiden – Führen – Verantworten. Soldatsein im 21. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Miles Verlag, 182–187.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., and Hardy, C., 2002. Discourse analysis. Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., and Jorgensen, M.W., 2004. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pigot, P., 2007. Canada in Afghanistan: the war so far. Toronto: Dundurn.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., 1996. Representing reality. Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saideman, S.M., May 2012. Afghanistan as a test of Canadian politics: what did we learn from the experience. The Afghanistan Papers 10. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Saideman, S.M., and Auerswald, D.P., 2012. Comparing caveats: understanding the sources of national restrictions upon NATO’s mission in Afghanistan. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 67–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00700.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J., 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, G., 2001a. 12 September 2001. Erklärung der Bundesregierung zu den Anschlägen in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika. In: Deutscher Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 14/186, 18293-18294.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, G., 2001b. 8 November 2001. Regierungserklärung. In: Deutscher Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 14/198, 19283–19287.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz von Thun, F., 1981. Miteinander reden 1 – Störungen und Klärungen. Allgemeine Psychologie der Kommunikation. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz von Thun, F., 2009. Das Kommunikationsquadrat. [Online]. Available from: http://www.schulz-von-thun.de/index.php?article_id=71 [Accessed 28 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, E., May 2012. Canada and NATO: a military assessment. Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute and Canadian International Council, Strategic Studies Working Group Papers, pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Spearin, C., Winter. 2014. Canada and Contracted War: Afghanistan and Beyond. International Journal 69 (4), 525–541. doi: 10.1177/0020702014546703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struck, P., 11 March 2004. Erklärung der Bundesregierung: Die neue Bundeswehr – auf richtigem Weg. In: Deutscher Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 15/97: 8600-8604.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., 1971. Interpretation and the Science of Man. Review of Metaphysics 25 (1), 3–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Globe and Mail, 2014. What Canada did – and did not – Achieve in Afghanistan. The Globe and Mail, 14 March.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T.A., 1996. Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walkom, T., 12 March 2014. For Canada, pointless Afghan war finally over: Walkom. The Toronto Star. [Online] http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/03/12/for_canada_pointless_afghan_war_finally_over_walkom.html [Accessed 10 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Weiland, G., June 2011. Eckdaten der politischen Entwicklung in Afghanistan seit 2001 und des deutschen Bundeswehreinsatzes (ISAF) – Afghanistan-Chronologie. In: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik: SWP-Chronologie. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., 2001. Debates in discourse research. In: Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon, J. Yates (eds), Discourse theory and practice. A reader. London: Sage, 380–399.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., and Meyer, M., 2009. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., and Schwartz-Shea, P., 2006. Interpretation and method. Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk and London: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar