References
- Aylward, E., & Brown, S. (2020). Sexual orientation and gender identity in Canada’s ‘Feminist’ international assistance. International Journal, 75(3), 313–328. doi:10.1177/0020702020953425
- Beier, J. M., & Wylie, L. (2010). Canadian foreign policy in critical perspective. Don Mills: Oxford University Press Canada.
- Black, D. R., & Smith, H. A. (2014). Still notable: Reassessing theoretical ‘exceptions’ in Canadian foreign policy literature. International Journal, 69, 2.
- Bow, B., & Lane, A. (2020). Canadian foreign policy: Reflections on a field in transition. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Bratt, D., & Kukucha, C. (2015). Readings in Canadian foreign policy: Classic debates and new ideas (3rd ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
- Doty, R. L. (2001). Desert tracts: Statecraft in remote places. Alternatives, 26, 523–543. doi:10.1177/030437540102600407
- Duriesmeith, D. (he/him/his). (2020). Friends don't let friends cite the malestream: A case for strategic silence in feminist international relations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22, 26–32. doi:10.1080/14616742.2019.1700818
- Eichler, M., & Gagnon, M.-C. (2021, February 26). Only a fundamental culture change will address military sexual misconduct. Policy Options. Retrieved from https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/february-2021/only-a-fundamental-culture-change-will-address-military-sexual-misconduct/.
- Enloe, C. H. (2004). The curious feminist: Searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Feminist Foreign Policy Working Group. (2021). What we heard: Feedback on discussions on Canada’s feminist foreign policy. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.ca/sites/default/files/FFP%20What%20We%20Heard%20EN.pdf.
- Husband-Ceperkovic, T., & Tiessen, R. (2020). Beyond the binary: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Canadian foreign policy. In M. Tremblay & J. Everitt (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of gender, sexuality, and Canadian politics (pp. 585–611). London: Palgrave Macmillian.
- Inayatullah, N. (2011). Autobiographical international relations: I, IR. London: Routledge.
- King, H. (2017, July 31). The erasure of indigenous thought in foreign policy. Retrieved from the Open Canada website at https://www.opencanada.org/features/erasure-indigenous-thought-foreign-policy/.
- Larsen, K. (2019, June 5). Nova Scotia student says he was racially profiled at UBC-held congress. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/nova-scotia-student-says-he-was-racially-profiled-at-ubc-held-congress-1.4668201.
- Mason, C. (2019). Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Flattening intersectionality in Canadian aid. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 25, 203–219.
- Morton, S., Muchiri, J., & Swiss, L. (2020). Which feminism(s)? For whom? Intersectionality in Canada’s Feminist International Assistance policy. International Journal, 75, 329–348. doi:10.1177/0020702020953420
- Murphy, M., & Bouka, Y. (2020, August 19). A conversation with Dr. Yolande Bouka on the state of the academic study of international relations. Women in International Security. Retrieved from https://www.wiisglobal.org/a-conversation-with-dr-yolande-bouka-on-the-state-of-the-academic-study-of-international-relations/.
- Nossal, K. R., Roussel, S., & Paquin, S. (2015). The politics of Canadian foreign policy (4th ed.). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
- Pachego-Vega, R. (2021, March 14). Academic writing. Retrieved fromhttp://www.raulpacheco.org/resources/academic-writing-acwri/.
- Parpart, J. L., & Parashar, S. (2018). Rethinking silence, voice and agency in contested gendered terrains (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
- Rao, S., & Tiessen, R. (2020). Whose feminism(s)? overseas partner organizations’ perceptions of Canada’s Feminist International Assistance policy. International Journal, 75, 349–366. doi:10.1177/0020702020960120
- Smith, H. A., & Yahlnaaw. (2021). Disruption as reconciliation: Lessons learned when students as partners become students as teachers. In H. A. Smith & D. J. Hornsby (Eds.), Teaching international relations in the age of disruption. Palgrave Press.
- Stienstra, D. (1994–1995). Can the silence be broken? Gender and Canadian foreign policy. International Journal, 50, 103–127.
- Towns, A. (2019). Gender troubled? Three simple steps to avoid silencing gender in IR. E-International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2019/02/15/gender-troubled-three-simple-steps-to-avoid-silencing-gender-in-ir/.
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to action. Retrieved from https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/british-columbians-our-governments/indigenous-people/aboriginal-peoples-documents/calls_to_action_english2.pdf.
- Tuck, E., & Yang, W. K. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1–40.
- von Hlatky, S. (2021). The Vance allegations: Next steps for culture change in the Canadian armed forces. Network for Strategic Analysis. Retrieved from https://ras-nsa.ca/publication/the-vance-allegations-next-steps-for-culture-change-in-the-canadian-armed-forces/.
- Zalewski, M. (2006). Distracted Reflections on The production, narration, and refusal of feminist knowledge in international relations. In B. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist methodologies for international relations (pp. 42–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zalewski, M. (2013). Feminist International Relations: Exquisite Corpse. London: Routledge.