408
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Dispersal of bryophytes and ferns is facilitated by small mammals in the boreal forest

, , , , , & show all
Pages 67-76 | Received 27 May 2016, Accepted 09 Sep 2016, Published online: 03 Nov 2016

References

  • Arosa ML, Ramos JA, Quintanilla D, Brown LG. 2010. First report of fern (Culcita macrocarpa) spore consumption by a small mammal (Apodemus sylvaticus). Mamm Biol. 75:115–121.
  • Baker JA, Entsch B, McKay DB. 2003. The cyanobiont in an Azolla fern is neither Anabaena nor Nostoc. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 229:43–47.
  • Barbé M, Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y. 2016. So close and yet so far away: long-distance dispersal events govern bryophyte metacommunity reassembly. J Ecol. 104(4). DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12637
  • Bay G, Nahar N, Oubre M., Whitehouse MJ, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, Nilsson M-C, Rasmussen U. 2013. Boreal feather mosses secrete chemical signals to gain nitrogen. New Phytol. 200:54–60.
  • Benscoter BW. 2006. Post-fire bryophyte establishment in a continental bog. J Veg Sci. 17:647–652.
  • Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Flannigan M, Kafka V. 2004. Fire regimes at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in Northwestern Quebec. Ecology. 85:1916–1932.
  • Boch S, Berlinger M, Fisher M, Knop E, Nentwig W, Türke M, Prati D. 2013. Fern and bryophyte endozoochory by slugs. Oecologia. 172:817–822.
  • Bowman J, Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L. 2002. Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology. 83:2049–2055.
  • C-Fern Project ©. 1995–2014. Nutrient Medium Preparation—Traditional Method. Available from: http://www.c-fern.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=82&Itemi.
  • Carey AB. 2003. Managing for wildlife: a key component for social acceptance of compatible forest management. In: Monserud RA, Haynes RW, Johnson AC, editors, Compatible Forest Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Chapter 14 p. 401–424.
  • Clark KL, Nadkarni NM, Gholz HL. 2005. Retention of inorganic nitrogen by epiphytic bryophytes in a tropical montane forest. Biotropica. 37:328–336.
  • Couvreur M, Christiaen B, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2004. Large herbivores as mobile links between isolated nature reserves through adhesive seed dispersal. Appl Veg Sci. 7:229–236.
  • Crum HA. 2001. The Structural Diversity of Bryophytes. University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Davidson AJ, Harborne JB, Longton RE. 1990. The acceptability of mosses as food for generalist herbivores, slugs in the Arionidae. Bot J Linn Soc. 104:99–113.
  • Davison GWH. 1976. Role of birds in moss dispersal. Brit Birds. 69:65–66.
  • De Groot GA, During HJ, Ansell SW, Schneider S, Bremer P, Wubs REJ, Maas JW, Korpelainen H, Erkens RHJ. 2012. Diverse spore rains and limited local exchange shape fern genetic diversity in a recently created habitat colonized by long-distance dispersal. Ann Bot London. 109:965–987.
  • DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Gentili F, Sellstedt A, Nilsson MC. 2007. Ecosystem controls on nitrogen fixation in boreal feather moss communities. Oecologia. 152:121–130.
  • Demidova EE, Filin VR. 1994. False columella and spore release in Tetraplodon angustatus (Hedw.) Bruch et Schimp. in B.S.G. and T. mnioides (Hedw.) Bruch et Schimp. in B.S.G. (Musci: Splachnaceae). Arctoa. 3:1–6.
  • Eckert CG. 2002. The loss of sex in clonal plants. Evol. Ecol. 15:501–520.
  • Environment Canada. 2015. Canadian Climate Normals 1981–2010 Station Data. Available from: http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=6051&lang=e&StationName=Lebel+sur+Quevillon&SearchType=Contains&stnNameSubmit=go&dCode=5&dispBack=1.
  • Faubert J. 2013. Flore des bryophytes du Québec-Labrador – Volume 2: Mousses, première partie. Saint-Valérien, Québec: Société québécoise de bryologie.
  • Faubert J. 2014. Flore des bryophytes du Québec-Labrador – Volume 3: Mousses, seconde partie. Saint-Valérien, Québec: Société québécoise de bryologie.
  • Fauteux D, Imbeau L, Drapeau P, Mazerolle MJ. 2012. Small mammal responses to coarse woody debris distribution at different spatial scales in managed and unmanaged boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manag. 266:194–205.
  • Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y. 2006. Facilitative succession in a boreal bryophyte community driven by changes in available moisture and light. J Veg Sci. 17:65–76.
  • George LM, Bazzaz FA. 1999. The fern understory as an ecological filter: emergence and establishment of canopy tree-seedlings. Ecology. 80:833–845.
  • Glime JM. 2014. Adaptive strategies: spore dispersal vectors. Chapters 4–9. In: Glime JM, editor. Bryophyte ecology. Volume 1. 4–9–1 physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 28 April 2014. Available from: www.bryoecol.mtu.edu.
  • Grondin P. 1996. Écologie forestière. In: Bérard LA, Côté M, editors, Manuel de foresterie. Presse de l’Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada; p. 133–279.
  • Haines WP, Renwick JAA. 2009. Bryophyte as food: comparative consumption and utilization of mosses by a generalist insect herbivore. Entomol Exp Appl. 133:296–306.
  • Heinken T, Lees R, Raudnitschka D, Runge S. 2001. Epizoochorous dispersal of bryophyte stem fragments by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa). J Bryol. 23:293–300.
  • Hock Z, Szövényi P, Tóth Z. 2004. Seasonal variation in the bryophyte diaspore bank of open grasslands on dolomite rock. J Bryol. 26:285–292.
  • Hylander K. 2009. No increase in colonization rate of boreal bryophytes close to propagule sources. Ecology. 90:160–169.
  • Ignatov MS, Ignatova EA. 2001. On the zoochory of Schistostega pennata (Schistostegaceae, Musci). Arctoa. 10:83–96.
  • Imbeau L, St-Laurent MH, Marzell L, Brodeur V. 2015. Current capacity to conduct ecologically sustainable forest management in north eastern Canada reveals challenges for conservation of biodiversity. Can J For Res. 45:567–578.
  • Johansson V, Lönnell N, Rannik Ü, Sundberg S, Hylander K. 2015. Air humidity thresholds trigger active moss spore release to extend dispersal in space and time. Funct Ecol. Epub. DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.12606
  • Johansson V, Lönnell N, Sundberg S, Hylander K. 2014. Release thresholds for moss spores: the importance of turbulence and sporophyte length. J Ecol. 102:721–729.
  • Kimmerer RW. 1994. Ecological consequences of sexual versus asexual reproduction in Dicranum flagellare and Tetraphis pellucida. Bryologist. 97:20–25.
  • Kimmerer RW, Young CC. 1995. The role of slugs in dispersal of the asexual propagules of Dicranum flagellare. Bryologist. 98:149–153.
  • Klekowski EJ. 1969. Reproductive biology of the Pteridophyta. III. A study of the Blechnaceae. Bot J Linn Soc. 62:361–377.
  • Larsen KL, Boutin S. 1994. Movements, survival, and settlement of red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) offspring. Ecology. 75:214–223.
  • Larsen KL, Boutin S. 1995. Exploring territory quality in the Northern American red squirrel through removal experiments. Can J Zool. 73:1115–1122.
  • Legendre P, Legendre L. 2012. Numerical Ecology, 3rd Edition. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
  • Lewis LR, Behling E, Gousse H, Qian E, Elphick CS, Lamarre J-F, Bêty J, Liebezeit J, Rozzi R, Goffinet B. 2014. First evidence of bryophyte diaspores in the plumage of trans equatorial migrant birds. PeerJ 2 e424.
  • Löbel S, Rydin G. 2009. Dispersal and life history strategies in epiphyte metacommunities: alternative solutions to survival in patchy, dynamic landscapes. Oecologia. 161:569–579.
  • Lõhmus A, Lõhmus P, Vellak K. 2007. Substratum diversity explains landscape-scale co-variation in the species-richness of bryophytes and lichens. Biol Conserv. 135:45–414.
  • Lönnell N. 2011. Wind dispersal of spores with focus on bryophytes. Plant Ecol 3:1–37.
  • Mälson K, Rydin H. 2007. The regeneration capabilities of bryophytes for rich fen restoration. Biol Conserv. 135:435–442.
  • Marino P, Raguso R, Goffinet B. 2009. The ecology and evolution of fly dispersed dung mosses (family Splachnaceae): manipulating insect behavior through odour and visual cues. Symbiosis. 47:61–76.
  • Martineau P. 2014. Plantes de l’enclave argileuse Barlow-Ojibway - Québec. In: Martineau P, Plantes de l’enclave argileuse Barlow-Ojibway - Québec. Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, Canada.
  • Merritt JF. 1981. Clethrionomys gapperi. Mamm Species. 146:1–9.
  • Mills SE, Macdonald SE. 2004. Predictors of moss and liverwort species diversity of microsites in conifer-dominated boreal forest. J Veg Sci. 15:189–198.
  • Muñoz J, Felicísimo ÁM, Cabezas F, Burgaz AR, Martínez I. 2004. Wind as a long-distance dispersal vehicle in the Southern Hemisphere. Sciences. 304:1144–1147.
  • Osorio‐Zuñiga F, Fontúrbel FE, Rydin H. 2014. Evidence of mutualistic synzoochory between cryptogams and hummingbirds. Oikos. 123:553–558.
  • Parsons JG, Cairns A, Johnson CN, Robson SKA, Shilton LA, Westcott DA. 2007. Bryophyte dispersal by flying foxes: a novel discovery. Oecologia. 152:112–114.
  • Pauliuk F, Müller J, Heinken T. 2011. Bryophyte dispersal by sheep on dry grassland. Nova Hedwigia. 92:327–341.
  • Pohjamo M, Laaka-Lindberg S, Ovaskainen O, Korpelainen H. 2006. Dispersal potential of spores and asexual propagules in the epixylic hepatic Anastrophyllum hellerianum. Evol Ecol. 20:415–430.
  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rochefort L, Quinty F, Campeau S, Johnson K, Malterer T. 2003. North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands. Wetl Ecol Manag. 11:3–20.
  • Ross-Davis AL, Frego KA. 2004. Propagule sources of forest floor bryophytes: spatiotemporal compositional patterns. Bryologist. 107:88–97.
  • Rudolphi J. 2009. Ant-mediated dispersal of asexual moss propagules. Bryologist. 112:73–79.
  • Rünk K, Zobel M, Zobel K. 2012. Biological Flora of the British Isles: Dryopteris carthusiana, D. dilatata and D. expansa. J Ecol. 100:1039–1063.
  • Rydgren K, Økland RH, Picó FX, Kroon HD. 2007. Moss species benefits from breakdown of cyclic rodent dynamics in boreal forests. Ecology. 88:2320–2329.
  • Söderström L. 1987. Dispersal as a limiting factor for distribution among epixylic bryophytes. Symp Biol Hung. 35:475–483.
  • Stark LR. 2002. Phenology and its repercussions on the reproductive ecology of mosses. Bryol. 105:204–218.
  • Sundberg S. 2013. Spore rain in relation to regional sources and beyond. Ecography. 36:364–373.
  • Sundberg S, Rydin H. 2002. Habitat requirements for establishment of Sphagnum from spores. J Ecol. 90:268–278.
  • Tájek P, Bucharová A, Münzbergová Z. 2011. Limitation of distribution of two rare ferns in fragmented landscape. Acta Oecol. 37:495–502.
  • Turetsky MR, Bond-Lamberty B, Euskirchen E, Talbot J, Frolking S, McGuire AD, Tuittila E-S. 2012. The resilience and functional role of moss in boreal and arctic ecosystems. New Phytol. 196:49–67.
  • van Zanten BO, Gradstein SR. 1988. Experimental dispersal geography of neotropical liverworts. Beih Nova Hedwigia. 90:41–94.
  • Wells-Gosling N, Heaney LR. 1984. Glaucomys sabrinus. Mamm Species. 229:1–8.
  • Wróbel A, Bogdziewicz M. 2015. It is raining mice and voles: which weather conditions influence the activity of Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus? Eur J Wildlife Res. 61:475–478.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.