Impacts of rapid urbanization on ecosystem services along urban-rural gradients: a case study of the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area, South China

References

• Baró F, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D. 2017. Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: insights for landscape planning and management. Ecosyst Serv. 24:147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Brouwer R, Ferrini S, Schaafsma M, Barton DN, Dubgaard A, Hasler B, Hime S, LiekensI, NavrudS, et al.2011. Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. Environ Resour Econ. 50:365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM, Watson RT, Abson DJ, Andrews B, Binner A, Crowe A, Day BH, Dugdale S, et al.2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science. 341:45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ. 63:616–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan BA, Nolan M, Mckellar L, Connor JD, Newth D, Harwood T, King D, Navarro J, Cai Y, GaoL. 2016. Land-use and sustainability under intersecting global change and domestic policy scenarios: trajectories for Australia to 2050. Global Environ Chang. 38:130–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K. 2007. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ. 5:80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CC, Wang QX. 2012. Analysis of dynamic change of cultivated land resources and its driving force in Foshan City. Shaanxi Agr Sci. 58:185–187.
   Google Scholar
• Connor JD, Bryan BA, Nolan M, Stock F, Gao L, Dunstall S, Graham P, Ernst A, Newth D, Grundy M, et al.2015. Modelling Australian land use competition and ecosystem services with food price feedbacks at high spatial resolution. Environ Modell Softw. 69:141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al.1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv. 28:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Chang. 26:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Matson PA. 2008. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:9455–9456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 7:260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng SH. 2012. Dynamic effect on ecosystem services value change with regional land use change [ dissertation]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University.
   Google Scholar
• Dong JH, Shu TF, Xie H, Bao CK. 2007. Calculative method for ecosystem services values of urban constructive lands and its application. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci). 35:636–640.
   Google Scholar
• Dong M, Bryan BA, Connor JD, Nolan M, Gao L. 2015. Land use mapping error introduces strongly-localised, scale-dependent uncertainty into land use and ecosystem services modelling. Ecosyst Serv. 15:63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol. 47:377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estoque RC, Murayama Y. 2013. Landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes: implications for environmental sustainability planning for the rapidly urbanizing summer capital of the Philippines. Landsc Urban Plan. 116:60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang JY, Ke JH, Tang ZY, Chen AP. 2001. Implications and estimations of four terrestrial productivity parameters. Acta Phytoecol Sin. 25:414–419.
   Google Scholar
• Fang X, Tang G, Li B, Han R. 2014. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service values in relation to land use pattern in the Loess Plateau of China at town scale. PLoS One. 9(10):e110745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friess DA. 2017. Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst. 20:277–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu B, Zhang L, Xu Z, Zhao Y, Wei Y, Skinner D. 2015. Ecosystem services in changing land use. J Soils Sedim. 15:833–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu B-J, SuC -H, W eiY-P, WillettI R, Lü Y-H, Liu G-H. 2011. Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecol Res. 26:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaglio M, Aschonitis VG, Gissi E, Castaldelli G, Fano EA. 2017. Land use change effects on ecosystem services of river deltas and coastal wetlands: case study in Volano–Mesola–Goro in Po river delta (Italy). Wetl Ecol Manag. 25:67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Bryan BA. 2016. Incorporating deep uncertainty into the elementary effects method for robust global sensitivity analysis. Ecol Model. 321:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Bryan BA. 2017. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability. Nature. 544(7649):217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Bryan BA, Nolan M, Connor JD, Song X, Zhao G. 2016. Robust global sensitivity analysis under deep uncertainty via scenario analysis. Environ Modell Softw. 76:154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwin L. 1998. The worth of the earth. [accessed 2017 Aug]. http://www.nature.com/news/1998/981008/full/news981008-3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gong JZ, Liu YS, Xia BC. 2009. Spatial heterogeneity of urban land-cover landscape in Guangzhou from 1990 to 2005. J Geogr Sci. 19:213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangzhou Municipal Development and Reform Commission. 2009. The development plan of urban integration of Guangzhou and Foshan (2009–2020). [accessed2017Jul15]. http://www.gz.gov.cn/gzgov/s2884/201306/2418459.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Guo SH, Situ S. 2010. The value and utilization of Mulberry-Dike-Fish-Pond in the Pearl River Delta in perspective of the agricultural heritage. Trop Geogr. 30:452–458.
   Google Scholar
• Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, Kroll F, Seppelt R. 2012. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecol Soc. 17(3):22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ. 2006. Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne’s urban-rural gradient. Landsc Urban Plan. 78:435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SC, Li D, Xiong JH, Yi SP. 2016. Changes in cultivated land amount and their impacts on food security in Guangzhou. J Agro-Forest Econ Manag. 15:648–654.
   Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Müller F, Li B, Kroll F. 2015. Urban-rural gradients of ecosystem services and the linkages with socioeconomics. Landsc Online. 39:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hu H, Liu W, Cao M. 2008. Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ Monit Assess. 146:147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston RJ, Duke JM. 2009. Willingness to pay for land preservation across states and jurisdictional scale: implications for benefit transfer. Land Econ. 85:217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston RJ, Rolfe J, Rosenberger RS, Brouwer R. 2015. Introduction to benefit transfer methods. In: JohnstonRJ, RolfeJ, RosenbergerRS, BrouwerR, editors. Benefit transfer of environmental and resource values: a guide for researchers and practitioners. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 19–59.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston RJ, Rosenberger RS. 2010. Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J Econ Surv. 24:479–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Norton L, Austin Z, Browne AL, Donovan D, Emmett BA, Grabowski ZJ, Howard DC, Jones JPG, Kenter JO, et al.2016. Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land Use Policy. 52:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Boyle KJ, Kuminoff NV, Parmeter CF, Pope JC. 2013. What can we learn from benefit transfer errors? Evidence from 20 years of research on convergent validity. J Environ Econ Manag. 66:90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter UP, Harris HG, Matlock MD, Lacey RE. 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecol Econ. 39:333–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, Fohrer N. 2012. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy. 29:521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larondelle N, Haase D. 2013. Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol Indic. 29:179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, Seppelt R. 2011. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol Indic. 11:676–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Li W, Qian Z. 2010. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecol Econ. 69:1427–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Cheng ZQ, Ye M. 2008. Climatic characteristics of Guangzhou temperature and its cause analysis. Meteor Mon. 34:52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li J, Zhang H. 2012. An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China. Ecol Model. 225:127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long H, Liu Y, Hou X, Li T, Li Y. 2014. Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China. Habitat Int. 44:536–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowicki D, Walz U. 2015. Gradient of land cover and ecosystem service supply capacities – a comparison of suburban and rural fringes of towns Dresden (Germany) and Poznan (Poland). In: DrusaM, MarschalkoM, YilmazI, SegalliniA, FerreroAM, BednarikM, editors. World multidisciplinary earth sciences symposium, WMESS. Curran Associates, Inc. New York.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald RI. 2009. Ecosystem service demand and supply along the urban-to-rural gradient. J Conserv Plan. 5:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK. 2008. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol. 23:1143–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology. 71:1232–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagasawa R, Fukushima A, Yayusman LF, Novresiandi DA. 2015. Urban expansion and its influences on the suburban land use change in Jakarta Metropolitan Region (JABODETABEK). Urban Plan Des Res. 3:7.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:9495–9500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel EJ, Qenani-Petrela E, Mastin T. 2009. A benefit transfer estimation of agro-ecosystems services. Western Economics Forum, Spring 2009, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pendleton LH, Thébaud O, Mongruel RC, Levrel H. 2016. Has the value of global marine and coastal ecosystem services changed?Mar Pol. 64:156–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poelmans L, Van Rompaey A. 2010. Complexity and performance of urban expansion models. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 34:17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Turner MG. 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:12149–12154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford KG, James P. 2013. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural-urban gradient: a case study of Greater Manchester, UK. Landsc Urban Plan. 109:117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe J, Bennett J, Johnston RJ, Kerr G. 2011. ‘Yes we can…’: using benefit transfer to inform environmental policymaking. EERH policy brief. Canberra: Environmental Economics Research Hub, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe J, Windle J. 2008. Testing for differences in benefit transfer values between state and regional frameworks. Aust J Agr Resour Econ. 52:149–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite D, McGranahan G, Tacoli C. 2010. Urbanization and its implications for food and farming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 365:2809–2820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol. 48:630–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith VK, Van Houtven G, Pattanayak SK. 2002. Benefit transfer via preference calibration: “Prudential algebra” for policy. Land Econ. 78:132–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopsop GO, Abucay ER, Silvestre PR, Custodio HM, Manikham DT. 2016. Spatio-temporal pattern of landscape change due to urbanization: a case of Batangas City. J Nat Stud. 15:11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Bureau of Guangdong Province. 1991–2011. Guangdong statistical yearbook (1991–2011). Beijing: China Statistics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strohbach MW, Haase D. 2012. Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: analysis of patterns in a European city. Landsc Urban Plan. 104:95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan YZ, He J, Yue WZ, Zhang L, Wang QR. 2017. Spatial pattern change of the cultivated land before and after the second national land survey in China. J Nat Resour. 32:186–197.
   Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Li F, Liu X, Zhao D, Sun X, Xu L. 2015. Variation in ecosystem services across an urbanization gradient: a study of terrestrial carbon stocks from Changzhou, China. Ecol Model. 318:210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2010. Biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Viglizzo EF, Frank FC. 2006. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision. Ecol Econ. 57:140–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WolfKL. 2012. The changing importance of ecosystem services across the landscape gradient. In: Laband DN, Lockaby BG, Zipperer WC, editors. Urban-rural interfaces: linking people and nature. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America; p. 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. 2015. Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol Indic. 55:159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JJ, Huang ZQ, Yan H. 2002. State of water short due to water quality and countermeasure around China. Build Guangxi. 27:55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wu K-Y, Ye X-Y, Qi Z-F, Zhang H. 2013. Impacts of land use/land cover change and socioeconomic development on regional ecosystem services: the case of fast-growing Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Cities. 31:276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie GD, Lu CX, Leng YF, Zheng D, Li SC. 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J Natur Resour. 18:189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Xie GD, Xiao Y, Zhen L, Lu CX. 2005. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese J Eco-Agric. 13:10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Xie GD, Zhen L, Lu CX, Xiao Y, Chen C. 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J Natur Resour. 23:911–919.
   Google Scholar
• YeCS, DongYX. 2010. Effects of land use change on ecosystem service value of the Pearl River Delta. Tropical Geogr. 30:603–608, 621.
   Google Scholar
• Ye YQ, Zhang JE, Chen LL, Ouyang Y, Parajuli P. 2015. Dynamics of ecosystem service values in response to landscape pattern changes from 1995 to 2005 in Guangzhou, Southern China. Appl Ecol Env Res. 13:21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu XJ, Ng CN. 2007. Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects: a case study of Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan. 79:96–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Li JF, Wei YX. 2014. Spatio-temporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration. Chin J Appl Ecol. 25:883–891.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Peng J, Liu Y, Wu J. 2017. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: a case study in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, China. Urban Ecosyst. 20:701–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wang Y-C. 2011. Spatial-temporal dynamics of urban green space in response to rapid urbanization and greening policies. Landsc Urban Plan. 100:268–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipperer WC, Wu JG, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA. 2000. The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecol Appl. 10:685–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorrilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2014. Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan. 122:160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar