Modularity and robustness of a plant-frugivore interaction network in a disturbed tropical forest

References

• Almazán-Núñez RC, Arizmendi MdC, Eguiarte LE, Corcuera P. 2015. Distribution of the community of frugivorous birds along a successional gradient in a tropical dry forest in south-western Mexico. J Trop Ecol. 31:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August PV. 1981. Fig fruit Consumption and seed dispersal by Artibeus jamaicensis in the Llanos of Venezuela. Biotropica. 13:70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairey E, Kelsic ED, Kishony R. 2016. High-order species interactions shape ecosystem diversity. Nat Commun. 7:12285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascompte J, Jordano P. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 38:567–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM. 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100:9383–9387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaune D, Bretagnolle F, Bollache L, Hohmann G, Surbeck M, Fruth B. 2013. Seed dispersal strategies and the threat of defaunation in a Congo forest. Biodivers Conserv. 22:225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez-Malvido J, Dáttilo W. 2015. Interaction intimacy of pathogens and herbivores with their host plants influences the topological structure of ecological networks in different ways. Am J Bot. 102:512–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Hovestadt T, Fiala B, Blüthgen N. 2007. Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Curr Biol. 17:341–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie JF, Aslan CE. 2012. Halting regime shifts in floristically intact tropical forests deprived of their frugivores. Restor Ecol. 20:153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgos E, Ceva H, Perazzo RPJ, Devoto M, Medan D, Zimmermann M, María Delbue A. 2007. Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? J Theor Biol. 249:307–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science. 328:1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnolo L, Salvo A, Valladares G. 2011. Network topology: patterns and mechanisms in plant-herbivore and host-parasitoid food webs. J Anim Ecol. 80:342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo TA, Morales JM. 2016. Generalist birds promote tropical forest regeneration and increase plant diversity via rare-biased seed dispersal. Ecology. 97:1819–1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caryl FM, Raynor R, Quine CP, Park KJ. 2012. The seasonal diet of British pine marten determined from genetically identified scats. J Zool. 288:252–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM. 2015. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv. 1:e1400253–e1400253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacoff NP, Vázquez DP, Lomáscolo SB, Stevani EL, Dorado J, Padrón B. 2012. Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant–pollinator network. J Anim Ecol. 81:190–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A. 2005. Species richness estimation. In: Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B, editors. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. New York (NY): Wiley; p. 7909–7916.
   Google Scholar
• Chao A, Colwell RK, Lin C-W, Gotelli NJ. 2009. Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology. 90:1125–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen AF. 2000. The fifteenth-and twentieth-century colonization of the Basin of Mexico by the great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus). Global Ecol Biogeogr. 9:415–420.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell RK. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0. User’s Guide and Application. [ accessed 2016 Nov 29]. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. 1971. UN Treaty Series No. 14583. Ramsar (Iran). 2 Feb.
   Google Scholar
• Cottee-Jones HEW, Bajpai O, Chaudhary LB, Whittaker RJ. 2016. The importance of Ficus (Moraceae) trees for tropical forest restoration. Biotropica. 48:413–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Avila G, Gomes-Jr A, Canary AC, Bugoni L. 2010. The role of avian frugivores on germination and potential seed dispersal of the Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolius. Biota Neotrop. 10:45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dáttilo W, Lara-Rodríguez N, Jordano P, Guimarães PR, Thompson JN, Marquis RJ, Medeiros LP, Ortiz-Pulido R, Marcos-García MA, Rico-Gray V. 2016. Unravelling Darwin’s entangled bank: architecture and robustness of mutualistic networks with multiple interaction types. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 283:20161564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehling DM, Töpfer T, Schaefer HM, Jordano P, Böhning-Gaese K, Schleuning M. 2014. Functional relationships beyond species richness patterns: trait matching in plant–bird mutualisms across scales. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 23:1085–1093.
   Google Scholar
• Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, Ceballos G, Isaac NJB, Collen B. 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science. 345:401–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatti CI, Guimarães PR, Galetti M, Pizo MA, Marquitti F, Dirzo R. 2011. Analysis of a hyper‐diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms. Ecol Lett. 14:773–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoso I, Schleuning M, García D, Fründ J. 2017. Defaunation effects on plant recruitment depend on size matching and size trade-offs in seed-dispersal networks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 284:1855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, Fründ J, Blüthgen N, Gruber B. 2009. Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing Bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol J. 2:7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, Strauss R. 2014. A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol Evol. 5:90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubroeucq D, Geissert D, Moreno P, Millot G. 1992. Soil evolution and plant communities in coastal dunes near Veracruz, Mexico. Cahiers-ORSTOM Pédologie. 27:237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DM, Pocock MJ, Memmott J. 2013. The robustness of a network of ecological networks to habitat loss. Ecol Lett. 16:844–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcão JCF, Dáttilo W, Rico-Gray V. 2016. Sampling effort differences can lead to biased conclusions on the architecture of ant–plant interaction networks. Ecol Complex. 25:44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farwig N, Berens DG. 2012. Imagine a world without seed dispersers: a review of threats, consequences and future directions. Basic Appl Ecol. 13:109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming TH. 1988. The short-tailed fruit bat: a study in plant-animal interactions. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming TH, Kress WJ. 2013. The ornaments of life: coevolution and conservation in the tropics. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortuna MA, Stouffer DB, Olesen JM, Jordano P, Mouillot D, Krasnov BR, Poulin R, Bascompte J. 2010. Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? J Anim Ecol. 79:811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galetti M, Dirzo R. 2013. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of living in a defaunated world. Biol Conserv. 163:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galetti M, Pires AS, Brancalion PHS, Fernandez FAS. 2017. Reversing defaunation by trophic rewilding in empty forests. Biotropica. 49:5–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Romero A, Lara-López MS. 2006. Los anfibios, los reptiles y los mamíferos [Amphibians, reptiles and mammals]. In: Moreno-Casasola P, editor. Entornos veracruzanos: la costa de La Mancha. Xalapa (VE): Instituto de Ecología; p. 407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett. 4:379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg R, Foster MS, Marquez-Valdelamar L. 1995. The role of the white-eyed vireo in the dispersal of Bursera fruit on the Yucatan Peninsula. J Trop Ecol. 11:619–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães Jr PR, Machado G, de Aguiar MAM, Jordano P, Bascompte J, Pinheiro A, dos Reis SF. 2007. Build-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks. J Theor Biol. 249:181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães PR Jr, Jordano P, Thompson JN. 2011. Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks. Ecol Lett. 14:877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimerà R, Nunes Amaral LA. 2005. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature. 433:895–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RD, Tan S, Plotkin JB, Slik F, Detto M, Brenes T, Itoh A, Davies SJ. 2013. Consequences of defaunation for a tropical tree community. Ecol Lett. 16:687–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heithaus ER. 1982. Coevolution between bats and plants. In: Kutz TH, editor. Ecology of Bats. Boston (MA): Springer; p. 327–367.
   Google Scholar
• Henneman ML, Memmott J. 2001. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science. 293:1314–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull PM, Darroch SAF, Erwin DH. 2015. Rarity in mass extinctions and the future of ecosystems. Nature. 528:345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzunza ER, Hoffman SW, Goodrich L. 2005. Stopover ecology of Neotropical migrants in Central Veracruz, Mexico. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep. PSW-GTR-191; p. 657–672.
   Google Scholar
• Joppa LN, Montoya JM, Solé R, Sanderson J, Pimm SL. 2010. On nestedness in ecological networks. Evol Ecol Res. 12:35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordano P. 2016. Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Funct Ecol. 30:1883–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordano P. 2014. Fruits and frugivory. In: Gallagher RS, editor. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration of plant communities. 3rd ed. Wallingford ((OX)): CABI; p. 18–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kurten EL, Wright SJ, Carson WP. 2015. Hunting alters seedling functional trait composition in a Neotropical forest. Ecology. 96:1923–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees AC, Peres CA. 2008. Conservation value of remnant riparian forest corridors of varying quality for amazonian birds and mammals. Conserv Biol. 22:439–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SL, Edwards DP, Galbraith D. 2015. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science. 349:827–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Carretero A, Díaz-Castelazo C, Boege K, Rico-Gray V. 2014. Evaluating the spatio-temporal factors that structure network parameters of plant-herbivore interactions. PloS One. 9:e110430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez ML, García-Franco JG, Rico-Gray V. 2006. Las adaptaciones y las interacciones de especies [Species adaptations and interactions]. In: Moreno-Casasola P, editor. Entornos Veracruzanos: la costa de La Mancha. Xalapa (VE): Instituto de Ecología, A.C.; p. 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Adriano CA, Aguirre-Jaimes A, Díaz-Castelazo C. 2016. Floristic survey of flowering plants in a tropical coastal ecosystem in Veracruz, Mexico. Bot Sci. 94:185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley DJ, Pinsky ML, Palumbi SR, Estes JA, Joyce FH, Warner RR. 2015. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science. 347:6219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey KR, O’Farrill G. 2016. Loss of seed dispersal before the loss of seed dispersers. Biol Conserv. 201:38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello MAR, Rodrigues FA, Costa LdF, Kissling WD, Şekercioğlu ÇH, Marquitti FMD, Kalko EKV. 2015. Keystone species in seed dispersal networks are mainly determined by dietary specialization. Oikos. 124:1031–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmott J, Waser NM, Price MV. 2004. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:2605–2611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscarella R, Fleming TH. 2007. The role of frugivorous bats in tropical forest succession. Biol Rev. 82:573–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H. 2010. Vegan: community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Elberling H, Rasmussen C, Jordano P. 2010. Missing and forbidden links in mutualistic networks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 278:725–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P. 2007. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:19891–19896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortíz-Púlido R, Laborde J, Guevara S. 2000. Frugivoría por aves en un paisaje fragmentado consecuencias de la dispersión de semillas [Frugivory by birds in a fragmented landscape consequences of seed dispersal]. Biotropica. 32:473–488.
   Google Scholar
• Patefield WM. 1981. Algorithm AS 159: an efficient method of generating r x c tables with given row and column totals. ‎J Appl Stat. 30:91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Peredo A, Martínez D, Rodríguez-Pérez J, García D. 2013. Mammalian seed dispersal in Cantabrian woodland pastures: network structure and response to forest loss. Basic Appl Ecol. 14:378–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres CA, Dolman PM. 2000. Density compensation in neotropical primate communities: evidence from 56 hunted and nonhunted Amazonian forests of varying productivity. Oecologia. 122:175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres CA, Palacios E. 2007. Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in Amazonian forests: implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica. 39:304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Méndez N, Jordano P, García C, Valido A. 2016. The signatures of Anthropocene defaunation: cascading effects of the seed dispersal collapse. Sci Rep. 6:24820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Méndez N, Jordano P, Valido A. 2017. Persisting in defaunated landscapes: reduced plant population connectivity after seed dispersal collapse. J Ecol. 00:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock MJO, Evans DM, Memmott J. 2012. The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science. 335:973–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poisot T, Stouffer DB, Gravel D. 2015. Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time. Oikos. 124:243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Robles M, Andresen E, Díaz-Castelazo C. 2016. Temporal changes in the structure of a plant-frugivore network are influenced by bird migration and fruit availability. PeerJ. 4:e2048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro da Silva F, Montoya D, Furtado R, Memmott J, Pizo MA, Rodrigues RR. 2015. The restoration of tropical seed dispersal networks. Restor Ecol. 23:852–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripple WJ, Abernethy K, Betts MG, Chapron G, Dirzo R, Galetti M, Levi T, Lindsey PA, Macdonald DW, Machovina B, et al. 2016. Bushmeat hunting and extinction risk to the world’s mammals. R Soc Open Sci. 3:160498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EG, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP, et al. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science. 343:1241484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggera RA, Blendinger PG, Gomez MD, Marshak C. 2016. Linking structure and functionality in mutualistic networks: do core frugivores disperse more seeds than peripheral species? Oikos. 125:541–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumeu B, Devoto M, Traveset A, Olesen JM, Vargas P, Nogales M, Heleno R. 2017. Predicting the consequences of disperser extinction: richness matters the most when abundance is low. Funct Ecol. 31:1910–1920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer HM, Schmidt V, Winkler H. 2003. Testing the defence trade-off hypothesis: how contents of nutrients and secondary compounds affect fruit removal. Oikos. 102:318–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleuning M, Böhning-Gaese K, Dehling DM, Burns KC. 2014. At a loss for birds: insularity increases asymmetry in seed-dispersal networks. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 23:385–394.
   Google Scholar
• Schleuning M, Fründ J, García D. 2015. Predicting ecosystem functions from biodiversity and mutualistic networks: an extension of trait-based concepts to plant-animal interactions. Ecography. 38:380–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleuning M, Ingmann L, Strauß R, Fritz SA, Dalsgaard B, Matthias Dehling D, Plein M, Saavedra F, Sandel B, Svenning J-C, et al. 2014. Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. Ecol Lett. 17:454–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson P. 2005. Potential keystone plant species for the frugivore community at Tinigua park, Colombia. In: Dew JL, Bouble JP, editors. Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors. Dordrecht (HO): Springer Netherlands; p. 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles E. 1993. The influence of pulp lipids on fruit preference by birds. Vegetatio. 107:227–235.
   Google Scholar
• Terborgh J, Nuñez-Iturri G, Pitman NCA, Valverde FHC, Alvarez P, Swamy V, Pringle EG, Paine CET. 2008. Tree recruitment in an empty forest. Ecology. 89:1757–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature. 371:65–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travieso-Bello AC. 2000. Biodiversidad del paisaje costero de La Mancha, Actopan, Veracruz [Biodiversity of the coastal landscape of La Mancha, Actopan, Veracruz] [master’s thesis]. Xalapa (VE): Instituto de Ecología, A. C.
   Google Scholar
• Tylianakis JM, Laliberté E, Nielsen A, Bascompte J. 2010. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biol Conserv. 143:2270–2279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdovinos FS, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Flores JD, Espinoza C, López G. 2009. Structure and dynamics of pollination networks: the role of alien plants. Oikos. 118:1190–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiente-Banuet A, Aizen MA, Alcántara JM, Arroyo J, Cocucci A, Galetti M, García MB, García D, Gómez JM, Jordano P, et al. 2015. Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Funct Ecol. 29:299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Pijl L. 1957. The dispersal of plants by bats (Chiropterochory). Acta Bot Neerl. 6:291–315.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez DP, Melián CJ, Williams NM, Blüthgen N, Krasnov BR, Poulin R. 2007. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos. 116:1120–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez DP, Poulin R, Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI. 2005. Species abundance and the distribution of specialization in host–parasite interaction networks. J Anim Ecol. 74:946–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal MM, Hasui E, Pizo MA, Tamashiro JY, Silva WR, Guimaraes JPR. 2014. Frugivores at higher risk of extinction are the key elements of a mutualistic network. Ecology. 95:3440–3447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal MM, Pires MM, Guimarães JPR. 2013. Large vertebrates as the missing components of seed-dispersal networks. Biol Conserv. 163:42–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DM, Rawsthorne J. 2013. Mistletoe specialist frugivores: latterday ‘Johnny Appleseeds’ or self-serving market gardeners? Oecologia. 172:925–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts S, Dormann CF, Amm G, Ollerton J. 2016. The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant–pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes. Ann Bot. 118:415–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie DS, Bennett EL, Peres CA, Cunningham AA. 2011. The empty forest revisited. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1223:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar