Towardsaframeworkfor Classification and Recommendation of Semantic Web Service Composition Approaches

References

• A. Alamri, M. Eid, & A.E. Saddik, Classification of the state-of-the-art dynamic web services composition techniques, International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 2(2), 2006, 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• U. Kuster, M. Stern, & B. Konig-Ries, A classification of issues and approaches in automatic Service composition, 1st International Workshop on Engineering Service Compositions (WESC05) at ICSOC,05, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• I.B. Arpinar, B. Aleman-Meza, R. Zhang, & A. Maduko, Ontology-driven web services composition platform, IEEE International Conference on e-Commerce Technology, 2004, 46–152.
   Google Scholar
• J. Rao & X. Su, A survey of automated web service composition methods, Proc. 1st International Workshop of Semantic Web Service and Web Process Composition, USA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• HP Labs Semantic Web Programme, Jena-A Semantic Web Framework for Java, http://jena.sourceforge.net/, (accessed March 01, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• D.L. McGuinness & F.V. Harmelen, OWL web ontology language overview, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, (accessed on Feb 13, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Altova, SemanticWorks Semantic Web tool – Visual RDF and OWL editor, http://www.altova.com/products/semanticworks/semantic_web_rdf_owl_editor.html, (accessed March 01, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• F. Lecue & A. Leger, A formal model for semantic web service composition, 5th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, Georgia, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• L. Cabral, J. Domingue, E. Motta, T. Payne, & F. Hakimpour, Approaches to semantic web services: an overview and comparisons, in Proc. of First European Semantic Web Symposium, 2004, Greece, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 3053, 2004, 225–239.
   Google Scholar
• F. Casati, S. Ilnicki, L. Jin, Adaptive and dynamic service composition in EFlow, Proc. 12th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Srockholm, Sweden, Springer Verlaag, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P. Kungas & M. Matskin, Semantic web service composition through a P2P-based multi-agent environment, in Proc. of the Fourth International Workshop on Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing, 2005, Netherlands, Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, UCM, 4118, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• C. Abela, Semantic web services composition, Computer Science Annual Research Workshop, Malta Council for Science and Technology, Villa Bighi, Kalkara, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• V. Ermolayev, N. Keberle, O. Kononenko, S. Plaksin, & V. Terziyan, Towards a framework for agent-enabled semantic web service composition, International Journal of Web Service Research, X(X), 2004, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• S.A. McIlraith & T.C. Son, Adapting Golog for composition of semantic web services, in K.R., www.cs.toronto.edu/˜sheila/publications/mci-son-kr02.pdf, 2002, 482–496.
   Google Scholar
• D.L. Martin, A.J. Cheyer, & D.B. Moran, The open agent architecture: a framework for building distributed software systems, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 1999, 91–128.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sattanathan, N.C. Narendra, & Z. Maamar, ConWeScprototype – context-based semantic web services composition, in Proc. of International Conference in Service Oriented Computing, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• K. Sivashanmugam, J.A. Miller, A.P. Sheth, & K. Verma, Framework for semantic web process composition, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(2), 2004, 71–106.
   Google Scholar
• Q.Z. Sheng, B. Benatallah, M. Dumas, & E.O.Y. Mak, SELFSERV: a platform for rapid composition of web services in a peer-to-peer environment, Demo paper, Proc. of the 28th VLDB Conference, Hong Kong, China, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wu, A. Ranabahu, K. Gomadam, A.P. Sheth, & J.A. Miller, Automatic composition of semantic web services using process and data mediation, Technical Report, Kno.e.sis Center, Wright State University, http://knoesis.cs.wright.edu/library/publications/download/SWSChallenge-TR-METEOR-S-Feb2007.pdf, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• E. Sirin, Automated composition of web services using AI planning technique, Research Report, www.cs.umd.edu/Grad/scholarlypapers/papers/aiplanning.pdf, (accessed Sept 12, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• E. Sirin, B. Parsia, D. Wu, J. Hendler, & D. Nau, HTN Planning for web service composition using SHOP2, Journal of Web Semantics, Elsevier, 1(4), 2004, 377–396.
   Google Scholar
• H.J. Levesque, R. Reiter, Y. Lesperance, F. Lin, & R.B. Scherl, GOLOG: a logic programming language for dynamic domains, Journal of Logic Programming, 31(1–3), 1997, 59–83.
   Google Scholar
• B. Srivastava & J. Koehler, Web service composition – current solutions and open problems, ICAPS, 2003, http://www.zurich.ibm.com/pdf/ebizz/icaps-ws.pdf, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• P. Bertoli, J. Hoffmann, F. Lecue, & M. Pistore, Integrating discovery and automated composition: from semantic requirements to executable code, International Conference on Web Services, 2007, 815–822.
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Bruijn, H. Lausen, A. Polleres, & D. Fensel, The web service modeling language: an overview, in Proc. of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC’06), 2006.
   Google Scholar
• J. Peer, Web service composition as AI planning, research report 2005 – a survey, http://elektra.mcm.unisg.ch/pbwsc/docs/pfwsc.pdf, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• D. Berardi, D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, & M. Mecella, Automatic composition of e-services that export their behavior, in 1st International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC), V 2910, 2003, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kozen & J. Tiuryn, Logics of programs, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science – Formal Models and Semantics, ESP, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Microsystems, The source for Java developers, http://java.sun.com/, (accessed Sept 22, 2008).
   Google Scholar