An empirical evaluation of recent texture features for the classification of natural images

References

• Haralick R, Shanmugam M, Dinstein KI. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;SMC-3:610–621. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. Indexing based on scale invariant interest points. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision; 2001; Vancouver,Canada. p. 525–531.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Cui J, Wang W, et al. A study for texture feature extraction of high-resolution satellite images based on a direction measure and gray level Co-occurrence matrix fusion algorithm. Sensors. 2017;17:1474. doi: 10.3390/s17071474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakasa E. Texture feature extraction by using local binary pattern. INKOM. 2015;9(2):45–48. doi: 10.14203/j.inkom.420
   Google Scholar
• Lowe D. Distinctive image features from scale invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis. 2004;60:91–110. doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, et al. Speeded-Up robust features. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2008;110(3):346–359. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, et al. Speeded-Up robust features. ECCV. 2006;LNCS 3951:404–417.
   Google Scholar
• Hassaballah M, Abdelmgeid AA, Alshazly HA. “Image features detection, description and matching”, Image Feature Detectors and Descriptors, Stud Comput Intell. 2016;630:11–45.
   Google Scholar
• El-gayar MM, Soliman H, Meky N. A comparative study of image low level feature extraction algorithms. Egypt Inform J. 2013;14:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2013.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Sukthankar R. PCA-SIFT: “A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors”, Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2, 2004. p. 506–513.
   Google Scholar
• Barley A, Town C. Combinations of feature descriptors for texture image classification. J Data Anal Inf Process. 2014;2:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T. Multi-resolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2002;24(7):971–987. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao S, Law MWK, Chung ACS. Dominant local binary patterns for texture classification. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009;18(5):1107–1118. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2015682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta R, Egiazarian K. Dominant rotated local binary patterns for texture classification. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2016;71:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter Zhang G. Neural networks for classification: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern. 2000;30(4): 451–462. doi: 10.1109/5326.897072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato G, Falchi F. KNN based image classification relying on local feature similarity. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Similarity Search and Applications; 2010; ACM, Turkey. p. 101–108. doi: 10.1145/1862344.1862360
   Google Scholar
• Figat J, Kornuta T, Kasprzak W. Performance evaluation of binary descriptors of local features. Int Conference Comput Vis Graph. 2014;LNCS 8671:187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005;27:1615–1630. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglari O, Ahsan R, Rahi M. Human detection using SURF and SIFT feature extraction methods in different color spaces. J Math Compu Sci. 2014;11:111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Linderberg T. Feature detection with automatic scale selection. Int J Comput Vis. 1998;30(2):79–116. doi: 10.1023/A:1008045108935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. Scale and affine invariant interest point detectors. Int J Comput Vis. 2004;60:63–86. doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000027790.02288.f2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan L, Gwun O. A comparison of SIFT, PCA-SIFT and SURF. Int J Image Process. 2009;65:143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Panchal PM, Panchal SR, Shah SK. A comparison of SIFT and SURF. Int J Innov Res Comput Commun Eng. 2013;1(2):323–327.
   Google Scholar
• Biglari O, Ahsan R, Rahi M. Human detection using SURF and SIFT feature extraction methods in different color spaces. J Math Comput Sci. 2014;11:111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta R, Egiazarian K. Rotated Local Binary Pattern (RLBP) – Rotation Invariant Texture Descriptor”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods; 2013. p. 497–502.
   Google Scholar
• Broadtz texture image database. [Online], Available from: http://www.ux.uis.no/∼tranden/brodatz.html.
   Google Scholar
• Outex texture image database. [Online], Available from: http://www.outex.oulu.fi/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala T, Maenpaa T, Pietikainen M, et al. Outex – New framework for empirical evaluation of texture analysis algorithms. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1; 2002. p. 701–706.
   Google Scholar
• Broadtz texture image database. [Online]. Available from: http://sipi.usc.edu/database.
   Google Scholar