Secured steganographic scheme for highly compressed color image using weighted matrix through DCT

References

• Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D. Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 1994;7(3):123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang X, Yang R, Huang J. Geometric invariant audio watermarking based on an LCM feature. IEEE Trans Multimedia. 2011;13(2):181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preda RO. Semi-fragile watermarking for image authentication with sensitive tamper localization in the wavelet domain. Measurement. 2013;46(1):367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman SMM, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS. A new statistical detector for DWT-based additive image watermarking using the Gauss Hermite expansion. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009;18(8):1782–1796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zheng D, Zhao J, et al. Adaptive watermarking and tree structure based image quality estimation. IEEE Trans Multimedia. 2014;16(2):311–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Qian Z, Ren Y, et al. Watermarking with flexible self-recovery quality based on compressive sensing and compositive reconstruction. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Sec. 2011;6(4):1223–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CJ, Hwang WJ, Zeng HY, et al. A fragile watermarking algorithm for hologram authentication. J Display Technol. 2014;10(4):263–271.
   Google Scholar
• Upham D. JPEG-JSteg. 1997 [cited 2018 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.funet.fi/pub/crypt/steganography/jpeg-jsteg-v4.diff.gz
   Google Scholar
• Westfeld A. F5a steganographic algorithm. International workshop on information hiding; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. p. 289–302.
   Google Scholar
• Fridrich J, Goljan M, Du R. Invertible authentication watermark for JPEG images. International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, 2001. Proceedings; IEEE; 2001. p. 223–227.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Chen TS, Chung LZ. A steganographic method based upon JPEG and quantization table modification. Inf Sci (Ny). 2002;141(12):123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata M, Miyake K, Shiozaki A. Digital steganography utilizing features of JPEG images. IEICE Trans Fund Elect Commu Comput Sci. 2004;87(4):929–936.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Lin CC, Tseng CS, et al. Reversible hiding in DCT-based compressed images. Inf Sci (Ny). 2007;177(13):2768–2786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xuan G, Shi YQ, Ni Z, et al. Reversible data hiding for JPEG images based on histogram pairs. International Conference Image Analysis and Recognition; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. p. 715–727.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai H, Kuribayashi M, Morii M. Adaptive reversible data hiding for JPEG images. Information Theory and Its Applications, 2008. International Symposium on ISITA 2008. IEEE; 2008. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Yoo KY. A reversible JPEG-to-JPEG data hiding technique. 2009 Fourth International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control (ICICIC), IEEE; 2009. p. 635–638.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang S, Qian Z, et al. Reversible fragile watermarking for locating tampered blocks in JPEG images. Signal Processing. 2010;90(12):3026–3036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Lu ZM, Hu YJ. A high capacity lossless data hiding scheme for JPEG images. J Syst Softw. 2013;86(7):1965–1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai TH, Cogranne R, Retraint F. Statistical model of quantized DCT coefficients: application in the steganalysis of Jsteg algorithm. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014;23(5):1980–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh D, Singh SK. DCT based efficient fragile watermarking scheme for image authentication and restoration. Multimed Tools Appl. 2017;76(1):953–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidi M., Hermassi H., Rhouma R., et al. A new adaptive image steganography scheme based on DCT and chaotic map. Multimed Tools Appl. 2017;76(11):13493–13510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavoli R, Kozegar E, Shojafar M, et al. Weighted PCA for improving Document Image Retrieval System based on keyword spotting accuracy. 2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), IEEE; 2013. p. 773–777.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng YC, Chen YY, Pan HK. A secure data hiding scheme for binary images. IEEE Trans Commun. 2002;50(8):1227–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Gao T, Cao Y. Improving the embedding efficiency of weight matrix-based steganography for grayscale images. Comput Elect Eng. 2013;39(3):873–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana B. High payload reversible data hiding scheme using weighted matrix. Optik Int J Light Elect Opt. 2016;127(6):3347–3358.
   Google Scholar
• University of Southern California, The USC-SIPI Image Database; [cited 2018 Feb 3]. Available from: http://sipi.usc.edu/database/database.php
   Google Scholar
• Nottingham Trent University, UK, UCID Image Database; [cited 2018 Feb 3]. Available from: http://jasoncantarella.com/downloads/ucid.v2.tar.gz
   Google Scholar
• Lin CC, Shiu PF. High capacity data hiding scheme for dct-based images. J Inf Hiding Multimed Signal Process. 2010;220–240.
   Google Scholar
• Wei S, Zhe-Ming L, Yu-Chun W, et al. High performance reversible data hiding for block truncation coding compressed images. Signal Image Video Process. 2013;7(2):297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswapati J, Debasis G, Kumar MS. Weighted matrix based reversible data hiding scheme using image interpolation. Computational Intelligence in Data Mining; Vol. 2. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 239–248.
   Google Scholar