86
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multi-feature 3D model retrieval using view-based techniques

ORCID Icon
Pages 819-829 | Received 19 May 2018, Accepted 26 May 2019, Published online: 07 Jun 2019

References

  • Google. 3D warehouse. Available from: http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse; 2017.
  • H'roura J, Bekkari A, Mammass D, et al. 3D objects descriptors methods: overview and trends. 2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP); 2017 May 22–24; Fez, Morocco; 2017. p. 1–9.
  • Paquet E, Rioux M, Murching A, et al. Description of shape information for 2-D and 3-D objects. Signal Process. 2000;16(1):103–122.
  • Funkhouser T, Min P, Kazhdan M, et al. A search engine for 3D models. ACM Trans Graph (TOG). 2003;22(1):83–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/588272.588279
  • Kazhdan M, Chazelle B, Dobkin D, et al. A reflective symmetry descriptor for 3D models. Algorithmica. 2004;38(1):201–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-003-1050-5
  • Papadakis P, Pratikakis I, Perantonis S, et al. Efficient 3D shape matching and retrieval using a concrete radialized spherical projection representation. Pattern Recognit. 2007;40(9):2437–2452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.026
  • Osada R, Funkhouser T, Chazelle B, et al. Shape distributions. ACM Trans Graph (TOG). 2002;21(4):807–832. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/571647.571648
  • Ohbuchi R, Minamitani T, Takei T. Shape-similarity search of 3D models by using enhanced shape functions. Int J Comput Appl Technol. 2005;23(2–4):70–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2005.006466
  • Shum HY, Hebert M, Ikeuchi K. On 3D shape similarity. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1996, CVPR'96; IEEE; 1996. p. 526–531.
  • Sundar H, Silver D, Gagvani N, et al. Skeleton based shape matching and retrieval. Shape Modeling International, 2003; IEEE; 2003. p. 130–139.
  • Barra V, Biasotti S. 3D shape retrieval and classification using multiple kernel learning on extended reeb graphs. Vis Comput. Nov 2014;30(11):1247–1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-014-0926-5
  • Tao S. 3D CAD model retrieval based on the softassign quadratic assignment algorithm. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2018;77(13):16249–16265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5197-5
  • Zhang D. Harmonic shape images: a 3D free-form surface representation and its applications in surface matching [dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh; 1999.
  • Vranić DV, Saupe D. 3D model retrieval. Proc SCCG 2000; 2004.p. 3–6.
  • Shen YT, Chen DY, Tian XP, et al. 3D model search engine based on lightfield descriptors. Eurographics; 2003.
  • Zhang Y, Jiang F, Rho S, et al. 3D object retrieval with multi-feature collaboration and bipartite graph matching. Neurocomput. Jun 2016;195(C):40–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.118
  • Lee CH, Shih JL, Han CC, et al. 3D model retrieval using 2D cepstral descriptor of overlapping subbands; 2017. p. 276–279.
  • Gao Z, Wang D, He X, et al. Group-pair convolutional neural networks for multi-view based 3D object retrieval. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2018. p. 2223–2231.
  • Shih JL, Lee CH, Chuang CH. A 3D model retrieval approach based on the combination of pca plane projections. J Inform Technol Appl. 2011;5(2):46.
  • Ruiz CJR, Cabredo R, Monteverde LJ, Combining shape and color for retrieval of 3D models. Proceedings of the 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC; Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 2009. p. 1295–1300.
  • Biasotti S, Cerri A, Abdelrahman M, et al. Retrieval and classification on textured 3D models. Proceedings of the 7th Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval; Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland; Eurographics Association; 2014. p. 111–120.
  • Shilane P, Min P, Kazhdan M, The princeton shape benchmark. Proceedings on Shape Modeling Applications; IEEE; 2004. p. 167–178.
  • Biasotti S, Cerri A, Aono M, et al. Retrieval and classification methods for textured 3D models: a comparative study. Vis Comput. 2016;32(2):217–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-015-1146-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.