Speeding up multi-SVMs through modified working set selection

References

• Li YG, Zhang WD, Wang GL. Prune support vector machines by an iterative process. Int J Comput Appl. 2007;29(2):164–169.
   Google Scholar
• Jain D, Singh V. A two-phase hybrid approach using feature selection and adaptive SVM for chronic disease classification. Int J Comput Appl. 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2019.1577534.
   Google Scholar
• Zanaty EA, Afifi A. Generalized Hermite kernel function for support vector machine classifications. Int J Comput Appl. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2018.1489571.
   Google Scholar
• Nemmour H, Chibani Y. Handwritten digit recognition based on a neural SVM combination. Int J Comput Appl. 2010;32(1):104–109.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Fu H. PSO-based support vector machine with cuckoo search technique for clinical disease diagnoses. Sci World J 2014;7:548483.
   Google Scholar
• Patil MA, Tagade P, Hariharan KS, et al. A novel multistage support vector machine based approach for Li ion battery remaining useful life estimation. Appl Energy. 2015;159:285–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Li C, Chen J, et al. A novel multi-class support vector machines using probability voting strategy and its application on fault diagnosis of gearbox. Int J Perform Eng. 2014;10(2):173–186.
   Google Scholar
• Si W, Yang G, Chen X, et al. Gait identification using fractal analysis and support vector machine. Soft Comput. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3609-8
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Xiao XL, Tian JW, et al. Application of support vector machines in classification of magnetic resonance images. Int J Comput Appl. 2006;28(2):122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Qianqian Z, Dongliang W. A SVM recommendation IoT model based on similarity evaluation and collaborative filtering of multi-angle knowledge units. Int J Comput Appl. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2018.1553271
   Google Scholar
• Chang X, Yu YL, Yang Y. Robust top-k multiclass SVM for visual category recognition. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Halifax, NS, Canada; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kho JB, Lee W, Choi H, et al. An incremental learning method for spoof fingerprint detection. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;116:52–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang TC, Yu PS, Lin KH, et al. Predictor selection method for the construction of support vector machine (SVM)-based typhoon rainfall forecasting models using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Meteorological Applications. 2018;25(4):510–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan R, Alli P. Feature selection and parameters optimization of support vector machines based on hybrid glowworm swarm optimization for classification of diabetic retinopathy. J Med Syst. 2018;42(10):195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SJ, Pham VH, Nguyen TN. Two-phase optimization for support vectors and parameter selection of support vector machines: two-class classification. Appl Soft Comput. 2017;59:129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu CW, Lin CJ. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2002;13(2):415–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crammer K, Singer Y. On the learnability and design of output codes for multiclass problems. Mach Learn. 2002;47:201–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kressel UHG. Pairwise classification and support vector machines. In: B Schölkopf, CJC Burges, AJ Smola, editor. Advances in kernel methods – support vector learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998. p. 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Bottou L, Cortes C, Denker JS, et al. Comparison of classifier methods: a case study in handwriting digit recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition; Jerusalem, Israel; 1994. p. 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Platt JC, Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. Large margin DAGs for multiclass classification. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2000;12:547–553.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Classification by pairwise coupling. Technical report, University of Toronto; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fei B, Liu J. Binary tree of SVM: a new fast multiclass training and classification algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2006;17(3):696–704.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietterich TG, Bakiri G. Solving multiclass learning problems via error-correcting output codes. J Artific Intell Res. 1995;2:263–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alber M, Zimmert J, Dogan U, et al. Distributed optimization of multi-class SVMs. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0178161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei H, Govindaraju V. Speeding up multi-class SVM evaluation via principal component analysis and feature elimination. Proceedings of the Workshop on Feature Selection for Data Mining: Interfacing Machine Learning and Statistics; Newport Beach, CA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Duan KB, Keerthi SS. Which is the best multiclass SVM method? An empirical study. In: Oza NC, Polikar R, Kittler J, Roli F, editors. Multiple classifier Systems. MCS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3541. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 278–285.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Liu X, Huo Z, et al. Multi-class support vector machine via maximizing multi-class margins. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Melbourne, Australia; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Arun Kumar M, Gopal M. Fast multiclass SVM classification using decision tree based one-against-all method. Neural Process Lett. 2010;32:311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielnicki W, Stapor K. Using the one-versus-rest strategy with samples balancing to improve pairwise coupling classification. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci. 2016;26(1):191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011;2:27:1–27:27. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyan C, Fisher R. Classifying imbalanced data sets using similarity based hierarchical decomposition. Pattern Recognit. 2015;48(5):1653–1672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keerthi SS, Shevade SK, Bhattacharyya C, et al. Improvements to Platt’s SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Neural Comput. 2001;13(3):637–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan RE, Chen PH, Lin CJ. Working set selection using second order information for training support vector machines. J Mach Learn Res. 2005;6:1889–1918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. Statistical learning Theory. New York: Wiley; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Thang PQ, Lam HT, Thur NT. Improving simplification of support vector machine for classification. Int J Mach Learn Comput. 2018;8(4):372–376.
   Google Scholar
• Platt JC. Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Scholkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ, editors. Advances in kernel methods - support vector learning. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1998. p. 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Mustaqeem A, Anwar SM, Majid M. Multiclass classification of cardiac arrhythmia using improved feature selection and SVM Invariants. Comput Math Methods Med. 2018;2018:7310496. 10 pages.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham-Van H, Nguyen HT, Wu S. Vietnamese handwriting recognition for automatic data entry in enrollment forms. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Information Technology and Electronic Commerce, Dalian; 2014. p. 141–145.
   Google Scholar