Differentially private model release for healthcare applications

References

• Omolara AE, Jantan A, Abiodun OI, et al. Honeydetails: a prototype for ensuring patient's information privacy and thwarting electronic health record threats based on decoys. Health Inform J. pMID: 31957538. DOI:10.1177/1460458219894479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omotosho A, Emuoyibofarhe J, Meinel C. Ensuring patients privacy in a cryptographic-based-electronic health records using bio-cryptography. 2017. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.01643
   Google Scholar
• Omotosho A, Emuoyibofarhe J, Oke A. Securing private keys in electronic health records using session-based hierarchical key encryption. J Appl Secur Res. 2017;12(4):463–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney L. K-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst. 2002;10(5):557–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machanavajjhala A, Kifer D, Gehrke J, et al. L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data. 2007;1(1):3–es.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Li T, Venkatasubramanian S. t-closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In: 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering; 2007. p. 106–115. DOI: 10.1109/ICDE.2007.367856.
   Google Scholar
• Sangeetha S, Sadasivam GS. Privacy of big data: a review. In: Handbook of big data and IoT security. Cham: Springer; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Virupaksha S, Venkatesulu D. Subspace-based aggregation for enhancing utility, information measures, and cluster identification in privacy preserved data mining on high-dimensional continuous data. Int J Comput Appl. 2019;2(4):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood A, Natgunanathan I, Xiang Y, et al. Protection of big data privacy. IEEE Access. 2016;4:1821–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlekar NP, Gomathi N. Ow-svm: ontology and whale optimization-based support vector machine for privacy-preserved medical data classification in cloud. Int J Commun Syst. 2018;31(12):e3700. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dac.3700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babrahem AS, Monowar MM. Preserving confidentiality and privacy of the patient's ehr using the orbac and aes in cloud environment. Int J Comput Appl. 2021;43(1):50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari A, Kumar V, Abbasi MY. Eaaf: Ecc-based anonymous authentication framework for cloud-medical system. Int J Comput Appl. 2020;9(13):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Xiong P, Li G, et al. Differentially private model publishing in cyber physical systems. Future Generation Comput Syst. 2020;108:1297–1306. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X17325554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokri R, Tech C, Stronati M, et al. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. 2017. (Tech. rep.). Available from: https://cloud.google.com/prediction/docs/gallery
   Google Scholar
• Fredrikson M, Jha S, Tech C. Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures Thomas Ristenpart. 2015. DOI:10.1145/2810103.2813677.
   Google Scholar
• Dwork C. Differential Privacy. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Apple's Differential Privacy [Internet]. Available from: https://www.wired.com/2016/06/apples-differential-privacy-collecting-data/
   Google Scholar
• Uber Releases Open Source Project for Differential Privacy. (n.d.). [Internet], Available from: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/differential-privacy-open-source-7892c82c42b6
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson Ú, Pihur V, Korolova A. RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response. 2014. DOI:10.1145/2660267.2660348
   Google Scholar
• Fanti G, Pihur V, Erlingsson Ú. Building a RAPPOR with the unknown: privacy-preserving learning of associations and data dictionaries. Proc Priv Enh Technol. 2015;2016(3):41–61. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01214
   Google Scholar
• Shin H, Kim S, Shin J, et al. Privacy enhanced matrix factorization for recommendation with local differential privacy. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2018;30(9):1770–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlioz A, Friedman A, Kaafar MA, et al. Applying differential privacy to matrix factorization. 2015. DOI:10.1145/2792838.2800173
   Google Scholar
• Friedman A, Berkovsky S, Kaafar MA. A differential privacy framework for matrix factorization recommender systems. User Model User-Adapt Interact. 2016;26(5):425–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSherry F, Mironov I. Differentially private recommender systems: building privacy into the netflix prize contenders. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2009. p. 627–635. DOI:10.1145/1557019.1557090
   Google Scholar
• Dwork C, Roth A. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found Trends Theor Comput Sci. 2013;9(3–4):211–407.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. 1986;1(1):81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uci Heart Disease Dataset. Available from: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Heart+Disease
   Google Scholar
• Guan Z, Sun X, Shi L, et al. A differentially private greedy decision forest classification algorithm with high utility. Comput Secur. 2020;96:101930. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404820302054
   Google Scholar