References
- Aktaş, C. (2000, September). Kamusal alanda İslâmcı kadın ve erkeklerin ilişkilerindeki değişim üzerine: Bacıdan bayana [On the changing relationship between women and men in the public sphere: From sisters to ladies]. Birikim, 137. Retrieved from http://www.birikimdergisi.com/birikim-yazi/2513/kamusal-alanda-islamci-kadin-ve-erkeklerin-iliskilerindeki-degisim-uzerine-bacidan-bayana#.V0SUUJN95E4
- Arat, Y. (1989). The patriarchal paradox: Women politicians in Turkey. New Jersey: Associated University Presses.
- Arat, Y. (1998). Feminists, Islamists, and political change in Turkey. Political Psychology, 19(1), 117–131. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00095
- Arat, Y. (2005). Rethinking Islam and liberal democracy: Islamist women in Turkish politics. New York: SUNY Press.
- Ayata, A. G., & Tütüncü, F. (2008). Party politics of the AKP (2002–2007) and the predicaments of women at the intersection of the Westernist, Islamist and feminist discourses in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 35(3), 363–384. doi: 10.1080/13530190802525130
- Aydın, G. (2016, January 29). Cinsiyet değil fırsat eşitliği [Not gender equality but equality in opportunities]. Hürriyet. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/cinsiyet-degil-firsat-esitligi-40047084
- Benhabib, S. (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Bohman, J. (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. In W. Rehg & J. Bohman (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 321–348). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bohman, J. (1997). Introduction. In W. Rehg & J. Bohman (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. ix-xxx). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bohman, J. (1998). Survey Article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–25. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00061
- Bora, A. (2004). Feminizm: sınırlar ve ihlal imkanı [Feminism: Boundaries and violation]. Birikim, 184–185, August/ September. Retrieved from http://www.birikimdergisi.com/birikim-yazi/4765/feminizm-sinirlar-ve-ihlal-imkani#.V0SVC5N95E4
- Bora, A., & Günal, A. (2002). 90′larda Türkiye'de feminizm [Feminism in Turkey in the 90s]. Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları.
- Brooks, A. (2007). Feminist standpoint epistemology. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice (pp. 53–82). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Çağlayan, H. (2015, April 1). Eşitlik adalet hegemony [Equality justice hegemony]. Bianet. Retrieved from http://bianet.org/bianet/kadin/163444-esitlik-adalet-hegemonya
- Çakır, R. (2000). Dindar kadının serüveni [The pious woman’s journey]. Birikim, 137, September. Retrieved from http://www.birikimdergisi.com/birikim-yazi/2512/dindar-kadinin-seruveni#.V0SOh5N95E4
- Çakır, S. (1994). Osmanlı kadın hareketi [The Ottoman Women’s Movement]. Cağaloğlu, Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
- Charrad, M. M., & Zarrugh, A. (2014). Equal or complementary? Women in the new Tunisian Constitution after the Arab Spring. The Journal of North African Studies, 19(2), 230–243. doi: 10.1080/13629387.2013.857276
- Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In W. Rehg & J. Bohman (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
- Dryzek, J. (2009). The Australian Citizens’ Parliament: A world first. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5(1), 1–7.
- Elster, J. (1998). Deliberation and constitution making. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 97–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139175005.006
- First Lady: The principle of social justice must be benchmark of the equality of women and men. (2015, December 11). Retrieved from https://www.tccb.gov.tr/en/news/542/37252/first-lady-the-principle-of-social-gender-justice-must-be-the-benchmark-of-the-equality-of-women-and-men.html
- Fishkin, J. S. (2011). Deliberative democracy and constitutions. Social philosophy and policy, 28(1), 242–260. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139151528.011 doi: 10.1017/S0265052510000129
- Forst, R. (2001). The rule of reasons. Three models of deliberative democracy. Ratio Juris, 14(4), 345–378. doi: 10.1111/1467-9337.00186
- Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fung, A. (2007). Minipublics: Deliberative designs and their consequences. In W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy (pp. 159–184). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Göle, N. (1996). The forbidden modern: Civilization and veiling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Hacımirzaoğlu, A. B. (1998). 75 yılda kadınlar ve erkekler [Women and Men in 75 Years]. Türkiye Is Bankasi, Istanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
- Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Hartsock, N. C. (1983). The Feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding and M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering Reality (pp. 283–310). Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15
- Heckman, S. J. (1997). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 22(2), 367–324. doi: 10.1086/495161
- Turkish President Erdoğan says gender equality “against nature.” (2014, November 24). Hürriyet Daily News.. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-president-erdogan-says-gender-equality-against-nature.aspx?pageID=238
- İlkkaracan, P. (1997). A brief overview of women's movement(s) in Turkey (and the influence of political discourses). Women for Women's Human Rights reports, No. 2. Istanbul: Women for Women's Human Rights.
- İlkkaracan, P. (2015, January 2). Vatikan’dan kopya: Toplumsal cinsiyet adaleti [Copied from Vatican: Gender justice]. Kazete. Retrieved from http://kazete.com.tr/makale/vatikandan-kopya-toplumsal-cinsiyet-adaleti_1013
- Kabasakal Arat, Z. F. (2015). Feminisms, women's rights, and the UN: Would achieving gender equality empower women? American Political Science Review, 109(04), 674–689. doi: 10.1017/S0003055415000386
- Less than 20 percent women in parliament? That’s not true democracy! (Rep.). (n.d.). Kadın Adayları Destekleme ve Eğitme Derneği [Association for the Support and Training of Women Candidates]. Retrieved from http://www.ka-der.org.tr/en-US/Page/News/3006/less-than-20-percent-women-in-parliament-that’s-not-true-democracy!.html?bid=365
- Kadıoğlu, A. (1998). Cinselliğin inkarı: Büyük toplumsal projelerin nesnesi olarak Türk kadınları [The denial of sexuality: Turkish women as the objects of massive social projects]. In A. B. Hacımirzaoğlu (Ed.), 75 Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler [Women and Men in 75 Years]. Türkiye Is Bankasi, Istanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
- Lancaster, C. (2014). The iron law of Erdogan: The decay from intra-party democracy to personalistic rule. Third World Quarterly, 35(9), 1672–1690. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.970866
- Lukensmeyer, C.J, & Jacobson, W. (2007). The 21st Century Town Meeting: Engaging citizens in governance. In P. Holman, T. Devane, and S. Cady (Eds.), The change handbook: The definitive resource on today's best methods for engaging whole systems (pp. 393–398). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 3(15), 338–368. doi: 10.1177/0090591787015003005
- Ministry of Family and Social Policy and Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2014). Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet araştırması [Research on Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey]. (Rep.). Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TKAA2014_Ozet_Rapor.pdf
- Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., Kennedy, R., Lazer, D., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who Wants to Deliberate - and Why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 56–583. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000298
- Niemeyer, S. (2011). The Emancipatory effect of deliberation: Empirical lessons from mini-publics. Politics & Society, 39(1), 103–140. doi: 10.1177/0032329210395000
- Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women’s capabilities and social justice. Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 219–247. doi:10.1080/1464988002000874 doi: 10.1080/713678045
- Onar, N. F., & Paker, H. (2012). Towards cosmopolitan citizenship? Women’s rights in divided Turkey. Theory and Society, 41(4), 375–394. doi: 10.1007/s11186-012-9171-y
- Ozan, Ö. (2015, February). Fitneyse fitne: Eşitlik olmadan adalet olmaz! [Sedition, so what: No justice without equality!] Sendika.org. Retrieved from http://sendika10.org/2015/02/fitneyse-fitne-esitlik-olmadan-adalet-olmaz-ozge-ozan/
- Öniş, Z. (2015). Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator, 50(2), 22–41. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335
- Rosenberg, S. W. (2007). Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Saktanber, A. (1994). Becoming the “other” as a Muslim in Turkey: Turkish women vs. Islamist women. New Perspectives on Turkey, 11(2), 99–134. doi: 10.1017/S089663460000100X
- Saktanber, A. (2006). Women and the iconography of fear: Islamization in post-Islamist Turkey. Signs, 32(1), 21–31. doi: 10.1086/505890
- Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347–376. doi: 10.1177/0090591797025003002
- Sawae, F. (2016). Post-Islamist advocacy on gender in Turkey. In S. Nejima (Ed.), NGO’s in the Muslim world: Faith and social services (pp. 87–101). New York: Routledge.
- Scanlon, T. M. (1982). Contractualism and utilitarianism. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 103–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tekeli, Ş. (1998). Birinci ve ikinci dalga feminist hareketlerin karşılaştırmalı incelemesi üzerine bir deneme [An essay on the comparative analysis of first and second wave feminist movements]. In A. B. Hacımirzaoğlu (Ed.), 75 Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler [Women and Men in 75 Years]. Türkiye Is Bankasi, Istanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
- Terkan, B. (2010). Political parties’ policies and discourses concerning women (The cases of AKP and CHP). Selçuk Iletişim Dergisi, 6(2), 115–136.
- Toprak, Z. (2015). Türkiye'de kadın özgürlüğü ve feminizm (1908–1935) [Women’s Emancipation and Feminism in Turkey (1908–1935)]. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.
- World Economic Forum. (2015). Global Gender Gap Report. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2015/the-global-gender-gap-index-results-in-2015/
- Yılmaz, S. A. (2015). A new momentum: Gender justice in the women’s movement. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 13(4), 107–115. Retrieved from http://turkishpolicy.com/article/719/a-new-momentum-gender-justice-in-the-womens-movement-winter-2015
- Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 600 Hundred Women from All Over Turkey Gather for Gender Equality. (2013, June 19). UNDP Turkey Press Releases. Retrieved from http://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2013/06/19/600-women-from-all-over-turkey-gather-for-equality.html