References
- Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the politics of the quantified self. Digital Health, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509
- Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3), Article 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142
- BQ Desk. (2020, August 28). BQ explains: How the national health ID will work. BloombergQuint. https://www.bloombergquint.com/law-and-policy/bq-explains-how-the-national-health-id-will-work.
- Buckley, T., & Gottlieb, A. (1988). Blood magic: The anthropology of menstruation. University of California Press.
- Chrisler, J. C. (2011). Leaks, lumps, and lines: Stigma and women’s bodies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310397698
- Corbin, B. (2020). Digital micro-aggressions and discrimination: FemTech and the ‘othering’ of women. Nova Law Review, 44, 1–27. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3630435.
- Dube, L. (2001). Anthropological explorations In gender: Intersecting fields. Sage Publications.
- Felizi, N., & Varon, J. (n.d.). Menstruapps- how to turn your period into money (for others). Chupadados. https://chupadados.codingrights.org/en/menstruapps-como-transformar-sua-menstruacao-em-dinheiro-para-os-outros/.
- Folkendt, K. (2019, September 5). So, what is femtech anyways?! Femtech Insider. https://femtechinsider.com/what-is-femtech/.
- Force-feeding aadhar. (2017). Economic and Political Weekly, 52(10), https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/10/editorials/force-feeding-aadhaar.html.
- Frost & Sullivan. (2018, January 31). Femtech: Time for a digital revolution in the women's health market. Frost & Sullivan. https://www.frost.com/frost-perspectives/femtechtime-digital-revolution-womens-health-market/.
- Galea, M., & Farretti, T. M. (2018). Improving pharmacological treatment in brain and mental health disorders: The need for gender and sex analyses. Frontiers in Neurology, 50, 1–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.06.007
- Gehl, W. R. (2014). Power/freedom on the dark web: A digital ethnography of the dark web social network. New Media and Society, 18(7), 1219–1235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554900
- Gehrman, E. (2021). A place in the room: Women are advocating for advances in women's health. Harvard Magazine. https://hms.harvard.edu/magazine/womens-health/place-room.
- Gilman, M. E. (2021). Periods for profit and the rise of menstrual surveillance. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 41, 1–16. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3824970.
- Glenza, J. (2019, May 30). Revealed: Women's fertility app is funded by anti-abortion campaigns. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/30/revealed-womens-fertility-app-is-funded-by-anti-abortion-campaigners.
- Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Donna J. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
- Johnson, S., Marriott, L., & Zinaman, M. (2018). Use of cycle length alone to predict ovulation, as predicted by apps, is highly inaccurate (19 G). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131(80), 80S–80S. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000533369.69172.b7
- Li, Y. (2021, July 15). Prioritising femtech in south-east asia: Opportunities and challenges. Forbes India. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/essec-business-school/prioritising-femtech-in-southeast-asia-opportunities-and-challenges/69139/1.
- Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory & Health, 10(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.6
- Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of health technologies. Critical Body Health, 23(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
- Lupton, D. (2014). Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociology Comapss, 8(12), 1344–1359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12226
- Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self: A sociology of self- tracking. Polity Press.
- McHugh, M. (2019, March 18). Does femtech give users control of their health or take it away? The Ringer. https://www.theringer.com/tech/2019/3/18/18267094/femtech-female-health-apps-menstruation-fertility-trackers-clue-glow-ava.
- Mishra, S. U., & Padhi, B. (2021). Evolving inequalities. Economic & Political Weekly, 56(19), https://www.epw.in/journal/2021/19/letters/evolving-inequalities.html.
- Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016). Self tracking. MIT Press.
- Parez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Chatto.
- Rathi, A., & Tandon, A. (2020, December 23). Gender, health and surveillance in India: A panel discussion. The Centre for Internet and Society. https://cis-india.org/raw/gender-health-surveillance-in-india-panel-discussion.
- Ritzer, G. (2015). The “new” world of prosumption: Evolution, revolution, or eternal return of the same? Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513509641
- Ravindran, S. T. K. (1992). Engendering health. UNDP Seminar, 396, 21–25. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/engendering_health.pdf.
- Rosas, C. (2019). The future is femtech: Privacy and data security issues surrounding femtech applications. Hastings Business Law Journal, 15(2), 319–341. https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol15/iss2/5.
- Sandhu, M., Gambon, E., & Stotz, C. (2020, March 8). Femtech is expansive—it's time to start treating it as such. RockHealth. https://rockhealth.com/femtech-is-expansive-its-time-to-start-treating-it-as-such/.
- Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theory. Sage Publications.
- Sondergaard, M. L. (2015, November, 3). Sharing the abject in the digital culture. Wordpress. https://transmedialeblog.wordpress.com/2015/09/28/marie-louise-sondergaard-sharing-the-abject-in-digital-culture/.