Agency, structure, institutions, discourse (ASID) in urban and regional development

References

• Aglietta, M. (1976). Régulation et crises du capitalisme. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bavington, D. (2002). Managerial ecology and its discontents: Exploring the complexities of control, careful use and coping in resource and environmental management. Environments, 30(3), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, M., Borque, G., & Lévesque, B. (2000). L’évaluation de l’économie sociale dans la perspective des nouvelles formes de régulation socio-économique de l’intérêt général (Working Paper No. 0013). Montreal: CRISES.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Commons. (1934). Institutional economics – Its place in political economy. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coraggio, J. L. (1983). Social spacesness and the concept of region. In F. Moulaert & P. A. Wilson (Eds.), Regional analysis and the new international division of labor: Applications of a political economy approach (pp. 21–31). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Debray, R. (1973). Prison writings. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the collège de France, 1978-1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gadrey, J. (1992). Manager le Conseil. Paris: Editions Ediscience International.
   Google Scholar
• Giunta, A., & Martinelli, F. (1995). The impact of post-fordist corporate restructuring in a peripheral region: The mezzogiorno of Italy. In A. Amin & J. Tomaney (Eds.), Behind the myth of European Union (pp. 221–262). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J., & Roth, R. (1987). Das neue Gesicht der Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: VSA.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2015). Spatial planning as condensation of social relations: A dialectical approach. Planning Theory, 14(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1177/1473095213501672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1982). The capitalist state: Marxist theories and methods. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 159–174. doi: 10.1080/17405900410001674506
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2005). The regulation approach on economic and social development (DEMOLOGOS Working Paper). Retrieved March 2, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/papers/4ra.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2005b). The periodization of capitalist economic and social development (DEMOLOGOS Working Paper). Retrieved March 2, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/papers/perio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2006). Varieties of capitalism. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of governance (Vol. 2, pp. 1009–1010). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2007). State power: A Strategic-relational approach. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2011a). Metagovernance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 106–123). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2011b). Rethinking the diversity of capitalism: Varieties of capitalism, variegated capitalism, and the world market. In G. Wood & C. Lane (Eds.), Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism (pp. 209–237). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. R. (2008). Theorizing socio-spatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karriem, A. (2009). The rise and transformation of the Brazilian landless movement into a counter-hegemonic political actor: A Gramscian analysis. Geoforum, 40(3), 316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2006). Central regulation of English local authorities: an example of meta-governance? Public Administration, 84(3), 603–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 157–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipietz, A. (2001). Pour le tiers secteur. L’économie sociale et solidaire. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1996). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. R. (1983). Regions and regionalism. In F. Moulaert & P. A. Wilson (Eds.), Regional analysis and the new international division of labor: Applications of a political economy approach (pp. 33–57). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, F. (2005). Services and post-industrialist society (DEMOLOGOS Working Paper). Retrieved May 9, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/papers/spis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, F., Moulaert, F., & Novy, A. (Eds). (2013). Urban and regional development trajectories in contemporary capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1976). Capital: Volume III. London: Lawrence & Wishart. 1894.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., (1987). An institutional revisit of the Storper-Walker theory of labour. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 11(3), 309–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1987.tb00052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2054. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Christaens, E., & Bosman, B. (2007). The end of social innovation in urban development strategies? The case of Antwerp and the neighbourhood development association 'BOM'. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 238–251. doi: 10.1177/0969776407077737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Jessop, B. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the analysis of socio-economic development in space. In F. Martinelli, F. Moulaert & A. Novy (Eds.), Urban and regional development trajectories in contemporary capitalism (pp. 18–44). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Gonzalez, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Social innovation and governance in European Cities: Urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. Journal of European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 195–209. doi: 10.1177/0969776407077737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (Eds). (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city? Community development and social innovation. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Mehmood, A. (2010). Analysing regional development and policy: A structural–realist approach. Regional Studies, 44(1), 103–118. doi: 10.1080/00343400802251478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., & Nussbaumer, J. (2005). Endogenous spatial development theory: Between idealistic reflexivity and path-dependent policy analysis (DEMOLOGOS Working Paper). Retrieved March 2, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/papers/capi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Swyngedouw, E. (1989). A regulationist approach to the geography of the flexible production system. Society and Space, 7, 327–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Wilson, P. (1988). Spatial responses to fordist and post-fordist accumulation and regulation. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 64(1), 11–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1988.tb01111.x
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Willekens, Fr. (1987). Decentralization in industrial policy in Belgium. In H. Muegge, W. Stöhr, B. Stuckey & P. Hesp (Eds.), International economic restructuring and the territorial community (pp. 814–836). Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. (1994). The process of loss – Exploring the interactions between economic and ecological-systems. American Zoologist, 34(1), 145–158. doi: 10.1093/icb/34.1.145
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A. (2001). Brasilien: Die unordnung der peripherie. Von der sklavenhaltergesellschaft zur diktatur des geldes. Vienna: Promedia.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A., Lengauer, L., & Trippl, M. (2009). Development (DEMOLOGOS Thematic Synthesis Paper 6). Retrieved May10, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp2/papers/TSP6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A., Mehmood, A., & Moulaert, F. (2013). The DEMOLOGOS methodology for analysing urban and regional trajectories. In F. Martinelli, F. Moulaert & A. Novy (Eds.), Urban and regional development trajectories in contemporary capitalism (pp. 45–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A., Swiatek, D. C., & Lengauer, L. (2013). Vienna between east and west: The construction of a new transborder Central European region. In F. Martinelli, F. Moulaert & A. Novy (Eds.), Urban and regional development trajectories in contemporary capitalism (pp. 106–126). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeek, H. (Ed). (2003). The political economy of European unemployment: European integration and the transnationalization of the (un)employment question. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1992). Local modes of social regulation? Regulation theory, thatcherism and uneven developments. Geoforum, 23(3), 347–363. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90047-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (Eds). (2011). Handbook of local and regional development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1988). Competitive strategy. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. B., Mintzberg, H., & James, R. M. (1988). The strategy process. concepts, contexts, and cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, D. (2011). The curse of wealth: Political ecologies of Latin American neoliberalism. Geography Compass, 5(8), 581–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00436.x
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L. (1995). More than a ‘war of words’: identity, politics and the struggle for dominance during the recent ‘political reform’ period in Hong Kong. Economy and Society, 24(1), 67–100. doi: 10.1080/03085149500000003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L. (2009). Culture, discourse, ideology and hegemony (DEMOLOGOS Thematic Synthesis paper 4). Retrieved March 2 from, http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp2/papers/TSP4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L. (2010). The production of hegemonic policy discourses: ‘Competitiveness’ as a knowledge brand and its (re-)contextualization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(2), 184–203. doi: 10.1080/19460170903385668
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L. ,& Jessop, B. (2013). Cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., & Jessop, B. (2009). Regulation, reproduction, and governance: Achilles’ heel of development (DEMOLOGOS Thematic Synthesis paper 3). Retrieved March 2, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp2/papers/TSP3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Theodore, N., Peck, J., & Brenner, N. (2005). Comparing capitalisms: Theorizing the persistence of institutional variation (DEMOLOGOS Working Paper). Retrieved March 2, 2016 from http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/papers/capi.pdf
   Google Scholar