3,026
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A curious case of property privatization: two examples of the tragedy of the anticommons in Ho Chi Minh City-Vietnam

, &
Pages 72-90 | Received 09 Jun 2015, Accepted 23 Jun 2016, Published online: 09 Aug 2016

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty (1st ed.). New York, NY: Crown.
  • Aichian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700076403
  • Bagdai, N., van der Molen, P., & Tuladhar, A. (2012). Does uncertainty exist where transparency is missing? Land privatisation in Mongolia. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 798–804. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.12.006
  • Bagdai, N., & Tsolmon, R. (2009, October 19–22). Land privatization practices in different Countries. Paper presented at the 7th FIG Working Regional Conference Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Barnett, J. M. (2010). The illusion of the commons. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25(4), 1751–1816.
  • Besley, T. (1995). Property rights and investment incentives: Theory and evidence from Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 903–937. doi:10.2307/2138750
  • Buchanan, J. M., & Yoon, Y. J. (2000). Symmetric tragedies; commons and anticommons. Journal of Law and Economics, 43(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1086/467445
  • Colliers-International. (2013). Ho Chi Minh City CBD Market Report. Ho Chi Minh City.
  • De Soto, H. (2001). Why capitalism works in the West but not elsewhere. International Herald Tribune.
  • Đức, T. (2005, July 26). Những uẩn khúc sau dự án Kumho Sài Gòn, Dân trí. Retrieved from http://dantri.com.vn/xa-hoi/nhung-uan-khuc-sau-du-an-kumho-sai-gon-1122353728.htm.
  • Galiani, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (2010). Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9–10), 700–729. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.002
  • Ha, S. K. (2013). Housing markets and government intervention in East Asian countries. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 17(1), 32–45. doi:10.1080/12265934.2013.777513
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  • Heller, M. (2013). The tragedy of the anticommons: A concise introduction and Lexicon. The Modern Law Review, 76(1), 6–25. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12000
  • Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–688. doi: 10.2307/1342203
  • Huynh, D., & Peiser, R. (2015). From spontaneous to planned urban development and quality of life: The case of Ho Chi Minh City. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11482-015-9442-7
  • Jieming, Z. (2002). Urban development under ambiguous property rights: A case of China’s transition economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00362
  • Kapeliushnikov, R., Kuznetsov, A., Demina, N., & Kuznetsova, O. (2013). Threats to security of property rights in a transition economy: An empirical perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 245–264. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2012.05.002
  • Kim, A. M. (2009). Land takings in the private interest: Comparisons of urban land development controversies in the United States, China, and Vietnam. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(1), 19–31.
  • Li, D. D. (1996). A theory of ambiguous property rights in transition economies: The case of the Chinese Non-State sector. Journal of Comparative Economics, 23(1), 1–19. doi:10.1006/jcec.1996.0040
  • Libecap, G. D. (1986). Property rights in economic history: Implications for research. Explorations in Economic History, 23, 227–252. doi: 10.1016/0014-4983(86)90004-5
  • Lin, G. C. S. (2012). “The tragedy of the commons”? Urban land development in China under marketization and globalization. https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/dl/2224_1556_Lin_WP13GL1.pdf.
  • Loehr, D. (2011). Land reforms and the tragedy of anticommons. Paper presented at the 1st World Sustainability Forum.
  • Loehr, D. (2012a). Capitalization by formalization? Challenging the current paradigm of land reforms. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 837–845. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.001
  • Loehr, D. (2012b). Land reforms and the tragedy of the anticommons-A case study from Cambodia. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su4040773
  • May, H., & Lahiff, E. (2007). Land reform in Namaqualand, 1994–2005: A review. Journal of Arid Environments, 70(4), 782–798. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.08.015
  • Nguyen, T. B., van der Krabben, E., & Samsura, D. A. A. (2014). Commercial real estate investment in Ho Chi Minh City – A level playing field for foreign and domestic investors? Habitat International, 44, 412–421. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.08.002
  • Sim, L. L., Lum, S. K., & Malone-Lee, L. C. (2002). Property rights, collective sales and government intervention: Averting a tragedy of the anticommons. Habitat International, 26(4), 457–470. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00021-8
  • Sjaastad, E., & Cousins, B. (2009). Formalisation of land rights in the South: An overview. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.004
  • Sturges, M. (2011). Enclosing the commons. Virginia Magazine of History & Biography, 119(1), 44–74.
  • Thao, B. T. H. (2013). Analysis of the Vietnamese commercial real estate market strategic investment implications for evergreen properties of Michigan, Inc. (Bachelor). Lahti: Lahti University of Applied Sciences.
  • Tsenkova, S. (2012). Private sector housing management: Post-socialist. In J. S. Susan (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of housing and home (pp. 420–426). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Tuyen, N. Q. (2010). Land law reforms in Vietnam – past & present. Asian Law Institute, National University of Singapore: Singapore.
  • Yip, N. M., & Tran, H. A. (2015). Is ‘gentrification’ an analytically useful concept for Vietnam? A case study of Hanoi. Urban Studies. doi:10.1177/0042098014566364
  • Zhu, J. (2012). Development of sustainable urban forms for high-density low-income Asian Countries: The case of Vietnam: The institutional hindrance of the commons and anticommons. Cities, 29(2), 77–87. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.005