Understanding residential location choices: an application of the UrbanSim residential location model on Suwon, Korea

References

• Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., & Bowman, J. (1998). Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model. Urban Studies, 35(7), 1131–1153. doi: 10.1080/0042098984529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2003). Growing smart by linking transportation and land use: Perspectives from California. Built Environment, 29(1), 66–78. doi: 10.2148/benv.29.1.66.53948
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Rood, T., & Appleyard, B. (1999). Tracking accessibility: Employment and housing opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A, 31(7), 1259–1278. doi: 10.1068/a311259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 247–261. doi: 10.1068/b240247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Barra, T., Perez, B., & Vera, N. (1984). TRANUS-J: Putting large models into small computers. Environment and Planning, 11B, 87–101. doi: 10.1068/b110087
   Google Scholar
• De Palma, A., Motamedi, K. Picard, N., & Waddell, P. (2005). A model of residential location choice with endogenous housing prices and traffic for the Paris region. European Transport, 31, 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, F., Kijst, M., & Burghouwt, G. (2002). Urban form and travel behavior. Micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Studies, 39(3), 507–527. doi: 10.1080/00420980220112801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. W. (1973). The economics of residential location. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G. (1989). New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A, 21(2), 145–159. doi: 10.1068/a210145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., & Bhat, C. (2007). Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: Application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(1), 31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the result tell us? International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 146–167. doi: 10.1177/0160017604273626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. (1995). The geography of urban transportation (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., & Abraham, J. (2005). Design and implementation of PECAS: A generalized system for allocating economic production, exchange and consumption quantities. In M. Lee-Gosselin, & S. Doherty (Eds.), Integrated land-use and transportation models: Behavioral foundations (pp. 253–273). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., Kriger, D., & Miller, E. (2005). Current operational urban land-use transport modeling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews, 25(3), 329–376. doi: 10.1080/0144164052000336470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., Levinson, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2008). Models of transportation and land use change: A guide to the territory. Journal of Planning Literature, 22(4), 323–340. doi: 10.1177/0885412207314010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y., Hassan, M., & Jun, C. (2011). An application of the UrbanSim land price model in Youngsan-gu, Seoul, Korea. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 15(1), 15–24. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2011.580138
   Google Scholar
• Kakaraparthi, S., & Kockelman, K. (2011). Application of UrbanSim to the Austin, Texas, region: Integrated-model forecasts for the year 2030. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(3), 238–247. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Ji, K. (2007). The characteristics of low-income families’ residential mobility: The case of public rental housing tenants in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Journal of Korean Planners Association, 42(1), 81–97. doi: 10.5124/jkma.1999.42.1.81
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Pagliara, F., & Preston, J. (2005). The intention to move and residential location choice behavior. Urban Studies, 42(9), 1621–1636. doi: 10.1080/00420980500185611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-Y., & Kim, Y.-H. (2013). A study on the house price determinants model considering spatial attributes of residential environment: The case of apartment in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association, 3(3), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K., Jin, L., Zhao, Y., & Ruiz-Juri, N. (2005). Tracking land use, transport, and industrial production using random-utility-based multizonal input–output models: Applications for texas trade. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(3), 275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Kryvobokov, M., Kercier, A., Bonnfous, A., & Bouf, D. (2013). Simulating housing prices with UrbanSim: Predictive capacity and sensitivity analysis. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 6, 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s12076-012-0084-1
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., & Waddell, P. (2010). Residential mobility and location choice: A nested logit model with sampling of alternatives. Transportation, 37, 587–601. doi: 10.1007/s11116-010-9270-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemp, J., Zhou, B., Kockelman, K., & Parmenter, B. (2008). Visioning versus modeling: Analyzing the land use-transportation futures of urban regions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 134(3), 97–109. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:3(97)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2011). Measuring transportation: Traffic, mobility and accessibility. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lochl, M., & Axhausen, K. (2010). Modeling hedonic residential rents for land use and transport simulation while considering spatial effects. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(2), 39–63. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v3i2.117
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In A. Krlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, & J.W. Weibull Edition (Eds.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J., Kriger, D. S., Hunt, J. D., & Badoe, D. A. (1998). Integrated urban models for simulation of transit and land-use policies. Retrieved July 23, 2010 from Transportation Research Board website http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/153800.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mills, E. S. (1972). Urban economics. Glenview: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, W. (2014). Analysis of residential location preference factors by characteristics of households in the case of Daegu-Gyeongbuk households. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 17(4), 702–717. doi: 10.23841/egsk.2014.17.4.702
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Z., Kryvobokov, M., Marchal, F., & Bierlaire, M. (2010). Disaggregate models with aggregate data: Two UrbanSim applications. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(2), 5–37. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v3i2.113
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55. doi: 10.1086/260169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sermons, W., & Koppelman, F. (1998). Factor analytic approach to incorporating systematic taste variation into models of residential location choice. Transportation Research Record, 1617, 194–202. doi: 10.3141/1617-27
   Google Scholar
• Thill, J.-C., & Wheeler, A. (2000). Tree induction of spatial choice behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1719, 250–258. doi: 10.3141/1719-33
   Google Scholar
• Voigt, B., Troy, A., Miles, B., & Reiss, A. (2009). Testing an integrated land use and transportation modeling framework for a small metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record, 2133, 83–91. doi: 10.3141/2133-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, P. (1996). Accessibility and residential location: The interaction of workplace, residential mobility, tenure, and location choices. Paper presented at the Lincoln Land Institute TRED Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, P. (2000). A behavioral simulation model for metropolitan policy analysis and planning: Residential location and housing market components of UrbanSim. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(2), 247–263. doi: 10.1068/b2627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, P. (2002). Urbansim: Modelling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 297–314. doi: 10.1080/01944360208976274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, P. (2006). Reconciling household residential location choices and neighborhood dynamics (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved January 6, 2008, from www.urbansim.org/pub/Research/ResearchPapers/smr-urbansim.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, P., Borning, A., Noth, M., Freier, N., Becke, M., & Ulfarsson, G. (2003). Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: Design and implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial Economics, 3(1), 43–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1022049000877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, P., Wang, L., Charlton, B., & Olsen, A. (2010). Microsimulation parcel-level land use activity-based travel. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(2), 65–84. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v3i2.124
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (1995, February). Current and future land use models. Paper presented at the Land Use Model Conference at the Texas Transportation Institute, Dallas.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton, W. (1974). Linear programming and locational equilibrium: The Herbert-Stevens model revisited. Journal of Urban Economics, 1(3), 278–287. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(74)90009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B., & Kockelman, K. (2009). Lessons learned in developing and applying land use model systems. Transportation Research Record, 2133, 75–82. doi: 10.3141/2133-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar