Searching for ‘community’ and ‘community involvement’ in urban policy

References

• Adamson, D., & Bromiley, R. (2013). Community empowerment: Learning from practice in community regeneration. International Journal of Public Management, 26(3), 190–202.
   Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., Held, D., & Köhler, M. (1998). Re-imagining political community: Studies in cosmopolitan democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (1999). Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 36(1), 59–72. doi: 10.1080/0042098993736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, J. (2004). The desire for community: Illusion, confusion and paradox. Community Development Journal, 39(3), 213–223. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsh017
   Google Scholar
• Chae, J. W. (2016). The origins and development of Korea civil society and challenges. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(6), 1089–1111.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1995). Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. In N. Nelson & S. Wright (Eds.), Power and participatory development: Theory and practice (pp. 30–42). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. H. (1989). Urbanisation, nation and the urban poor. In H. K. Kim (Eds.), Squatter areas and urban renewal (pp. 187–239). Seoul: Nanam.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 36–55). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The case for participation as tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 1–15). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. K. D., & Herbert, D. T. (1993). Communities within cities: An urban social geography. London: Belhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Bary, W. T. (2000). Asian values and human rights: A confucian communitarian perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1997). The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. T., & Urich, P. B. (1999). Information dissemination and communication in stakeholder participation: The Bohol-Cebu water supply project. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 40(3), 251–269. doi: 10.1111/1467-8373.00096
   Google Scholar
• Fittall, W. ( Chair). (1999, September). Report of the policy of the policy action team on community self-help. London: Home Office, Active Community Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Guijt, I., & Shah, M. K. (1998). Waking up to power, conflict and process. In I. Guijt & M. K. Shah (Eds.), The myth of community: Gender issues in participatory development (pp. 1–23). London: ITDG Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, S. K. (2001). Substandard settlements and joint redevelopment projects in Seoul. Habitat International, 25, 385–397. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., & McArthur, A. (1995). A comparative assessment of government approaches to partnership with the local community. In R. Hambleton & H. Thomas (Eds.), Urban policy evaluation (pp. 175–193). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2004). Towards participation as transformation: Critical themes and challenges. In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? (pp. 3–24). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J., Sefton, T., & Stewart, K. (Eds.). (2009). Towards a more equal society? Poverty, inequality and policy since 1997. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. S. (2001). Contemporary public involvement: Toward a strategic approach. Local Environment, 6(2), 135–147. doi: 10.1080/13549830120052782
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, T. L. (1994). Modernisation and post-modernisation approaches to participatory communication for development. In S. A. White, K. S. Nair, & J. R. Ascroft (Eds.), Participatory communication: Working for change and development (pp. 60–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-H., Lee, Y.-S., & Lee, S.-S. (2007). Resolution of interest conflict on urban development through resident-participation. Civil Society and NGO, 5(1), 241–284.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. (1997). “Asian-style democracy”: A critique from East Asia. Asian Survey, 37(12), 1119–1134. doi: 10.2307/2645761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. K. (1999). Globalization and the emerging welfare state – The experience of South Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8, 23–37. doi: 10.1111/1468-2397.00059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. A. (2013). Residents’ participation and exclusion in urban regeneration process: In the case of Samgakji, Youngju City. Space and Environment, 23(4), 102–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S. H. (2001). Improvement of urban low-income settlements in Korea. Proceedings of the Korea-UK workshop on urban squatter policies (I). Seoul: KRIHS & KAHPS.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. (1998). Dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2001). ‘People’s knowledge’, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N., & Wright, S. (1995). Part one: Introduction. In N. Nelson & S. Wright (Eds.), Power and participatory development: Theory and practice (pp. 1–18). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R. (1969). The quest for community. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare, P. (2010). Capacity building for community-led regeneration: Facilitating or frustrating public engagement? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(1/2), 32–47. doi: 10.1108/01443331011017029
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. C. (2003). Democratic governance in South Korea: The perspectives of ordinary citizens and their elected representatives. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 4(2), 215–240. doi: 10.1017/S1468109903001166
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., & Taylor, M. (1995). Empowerment and estate regeneration: A critical Review. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2003). Public policy in the community. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1993). Human development report 1993. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, D. (1998). A passionate dialogue: Community and sustainable development. In D. Warburton (Ed.), Community and sustainable development: Participation in the future (pp. 182–197). London: Earthscan Publications in association with WWF-UK.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. A. (1994). Introduction – The concept of participation: Transforming rhetoric to reality. In S. A. White, K. S. Nair, & J. R. Ascroft (Eds.), Participatory communication: Working for change and development (pp. 109–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar