On geography’s skewed transnationalization, anglophone hegemony, and qualified optimism toward an engaged pluralist future; A reply to Hassink, Gong and Marques

References

• Aalbers, M. B. (2004). Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: A non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language. Area, 36(3), 319–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2013). What if we all work in between? Notes on the geography of geographical knowledge production and consumption. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(2), 209–212.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B., & Rossi, U. (2007). A coming community: Young geographers coping with multi-tier spaces of academic publishing across Europe. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(2), 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banski, J., & Ferenc, M. (2013). “International” or “Anglo-American” journals of geography? Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 45, 285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. (1996). Logics of dislocation: Models, metaphors, and meanings of economic space. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. S. (2010). “Nothing includes everything”: Towards engaged pluralism in anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, L. D., & Kearns, R. A. (1998). Guest editorial: America unlimited. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16, 128–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, U. (2009). The invented periphery: Constructing Europe in debates about “Anglo hegemony” in geography. Social Geography, 4, 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, J., & de Pater, B. (1998). The international position of Dutch human geography: A quantitative exploration. GeoJournal, 45(1), 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, W. (1962). Theoretical geography. Lund: Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• Buttimer, A. (1983). The practice of geography. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, S. (2003). Towards a critical geography of partition(s): Some reflections on and from south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(2), 148–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claval, P. (2009). National schools of geography. In. R. Kitchin and N. J. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 7, pp. 236–241). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Derudder, B. (2011). Some reflections on the ‘problematic’ dominance of ‘Web of science’ journals in academic human geography. Area, 43(1), 110–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., & Liu, X. (2016). How international is the annual meeting of the association of American geographers? A social network analysis perspective. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 309–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fall, J. J., & Minca, C. (2013). Not a geography of what doesn’t exist, but a counter-geography of what does: Rereading Giuseppe Dematteis’ Le Metafore Della Terra. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 542–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J., Muellerleile, C., Olds, K., & Peck, J. (2007). Circulating economic geographies: Citation patterns and citation behaviour in economic geography, 1982–2006. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(3), 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregonese, S. (2017). English: Lingua franca or disenfranchising? Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 195(2), 194–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ramon, M.-D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography, 27(1), 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godlewska, A., & Smith, N. (1994). Geography and empire. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., Simonsen, K., & Vaiou, D. (2003). Writing (across) Europe: On writing spaces and writing practices. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, J., & López-Nieva, P. (2001). Are international journals of human geography really international? Progress in Human Geography, 25(1), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, C. (2016). Traduttore traditore, the translator as traitor. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(1), 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. D. (2001). English as international language in geography: Development and limitations. Geographical Review, 91(4), 675–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2007). It’s the language, stupid! On emotions, strategies, and consequences related to the use of one language to describe and explain a diverse world. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1282–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2017). Sketching the contours of an integrative paradigm of Economic Geography. Lund: CIRCLE, Papers in Innovation Studies, Paper no. 2017/12.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., & Marques, P. (2014). Advancing evolutionary economic geography by engaged pluralism. Regional Studies, 48(7), 1295–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, G., Lossau, J., & Oslender, U. (2005). Einfach sprachlos but not simply speechless: Language(s), thought and practice in the social sciences. Area, 37(3), 242–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooson, D. J. M. (1987). Geography east and west. GeoJournal, 14(2), 203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Jazeel, T. (2016). Between area and discipline progress, knowledge production and the geographies of geography. Progress in Human Geography, 40(5), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J. (1996). Academic tribes, disciplinary containers, and the realpolitik of opening up the social sciences. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1943–1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., & Sidaway, J. D. (2004). The trans-Atlantic connection: “Anglo-American” geography reconsidered. GeoJournal, 59, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., & Sidaway, J. D. (2016). Geography and geographers (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jöns, H., & Freytag, T. (2016). Boundary spanning in social and cultural geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, J. M., Grant, R., & Jianu, R. (2017). Cities on and off the map: A bibliometric assessment of urban globalisation research. Urban Studies. doi: 10.1177/0042098017720385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. M. (2005). Commentary: Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 6(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., & Qian, J. (2017). Knowledge circulation in urban geography/urban studies, 1990–2010: Testing the discourse of Anglo-American hegemony through publication and citation patterns. Urban Studies, 43(1). doi: 10.1177/0042098017717205
   Google Scholar
• Krijnen, M., Bassens, D., & Van Meeteren, M. (2017). Manning circuits of value: Lebanese professionals and expatriate world-city formation in Beirut. Environment and Planning A., 49(12), 2878–2896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. S. (2016). Provincializing critical urban theory: Extending the ecosystem of possibilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. (2009). Where is the bridge? Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 7–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. (1993). The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V., de Jong, S. M., Thissen, F., Van der Schee, J., & Van Meeteren, M. (Eds.). (2008). Dutch windows on the Mediterranean. Utrecht: KNAG.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33(9), 869–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melgaço, L., & Prouse, C. (Eds.). (2017). Milton Santos: A pioneer in critical geography from the global south. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell, M. W. (2004). Chauncy Dennison Harris (1914–2003). Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 982–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minca, C. (2000). Venetian geographical praxis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(3), 285–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minca, C. (2013). (Im)mobile geographies. Geographica Helvetica, 68(1), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017). Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of “conscientious engagement”. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(7), 954–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2007). What’s in a word? Problematizing translation between languages. Area, 39(2), 206–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2015). Academic capitalism and the geopolitics of knowledge. In J. A. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. J. Secor, & J. P. Sharp (Eds.), Companion to political geography (pp. 509–523). Wiley-Blackwell, NJ: Hoboken.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. O. (2004). The influence of American geography on Korean geography. GeoJournal, 59(1), 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2006). Is there an ‘Anglo-American’ domination in human geography? And, is it bad? Environment and Planning A, 38(4), 603–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samers, M., & Sidaway, J. D. (2000). Exclusions, inclusions, and occlusions in ‘Anglo-American geography’: Reflections on Minca’s “Venetian geographical praxis”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(6), 663–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, M. (2017 [2000]). Toward an other globalization: From the single thought to the universal conscience. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schuermans, N., Meeus, B., & De Maesschalck, F. (2010). Is there a world beyond the Web of Science? Publication practices outside the heartland of academic geography. Area, 42(4), 417–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (2000). Economic geography: The great half-century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. R., Boniche, A., Kim, Y., & Li, P. L. (2001). Cultural globalization, global English, and geography journals. The Professional Geographer, 53(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. (2002). Editorial: Global–local ambivalence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 27, 391–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (1992). On the borders of social theory: Learning from other regions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10(3), 307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timár, J. (2004). More than ‘Anglo-American’, it is ‘Western’: Hegemony in geography from a Hungarian perspective. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 35(5), 533–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M. (2016). From Polycentricity to a Renovated Urban systems Theory: Explaining Belgian Settlement Geographies (PhD Thesis). Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M. (2018). Fungible geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography. doi: 10.1177/2043820617744971
   Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M. (in press). Book review: Geography and geographers’ sublime incrementalism. Progress in Human Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M. (forthcoming). Writing blue notes in the march of geographical history: Revisiting the 1960 Lund Seminar in Urban Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M., Bassens, D., & Derudder, B. (2016). Doing global urban studies: On the need for engaged pluralism, frame switching, and methodological cross-fertilization. Dialogues in Human Geography, 6(3), 296–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M., Derudder, B., & Bassens, D. (2016). Can the straw man speak? An engagement with postcolonial critiques of “global cities research”. Dialogues in Human Geography, 6(3), 247–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehand, J. W. R., & Edmondson, P. M. (1977). Europe and America: The reorientation in geographical communication in the post-war period. The Professional Geographer, 29(3), 278–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (2003). Relocating ‘the critical’? Reflections from Israel/Palestine. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(2), 137–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar