A geographical political economy response to commentaries on ‘Coping with deindustrialization in the global North and South’

References

• Beckford, G. (1972). Persistent poverty: Underdevelopment in plantation economies of the third world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, R. (2019). ‘By out metaphors you shall know us’: The ‘fix’ of geographical political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 43(6), 1087–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M., Paddison, R., & Shirlow, P. (Eds.). (2020). Brexit geographies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. (2020). Reframing deindustrialization. International Journal of Urban Sciences.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, N., & Blumberg, R. (2012). Towards anarchist and autonomist Marxist geographies. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 11(3), 335–351.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2020). Is geographical political economy the only/right framework for understanding and explaining deindustrialization in the regions of the global North and South? International Journal of Urban Sciences.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Gong, H., & Marques, P. (2019a). Moving beyond Anglo-American economic geography. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 23(2), 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G., & Moisio, S. (2018). City regionalism as geopolitical processes: A new framework for analysis. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 350–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2021). Putting the case for a pluralistic economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 21(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oloruntoba, S. O., & Falola, T. (Eds.). (2020). The Palgrave handbook of African political economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B.-G. (2005). Spatially selective liberalization and graduated sovereignty: Politics of neo-liberalism and “special economic zones” in South Korea. Political Geography, 24(7), 850–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2021). On capitalism’s cusp. Area Development and Policy, 6(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2007). Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrons, D. (2012). Regional performance and inequality: Linking economic and social development through a capabilities approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 5, 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A. (2019). The potentials and perils of pluralism in culturally and politically inflected economic geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(1), 64–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Dawley, S., & McMaster, R. (2016). Doing evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography, 92(2), 123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, J., McEwan, C., Laurie, N., & Stenning, A. (2009). Economic geography under postcolonial scrutiny. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, 137–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. New York: United Nations Department of Economic Affairs, Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA).
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., Lee, N., & Lipp, C. (2020). Golfing with Trump: Social capital, decline, inequality, and the rise of populism in the US, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2038, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S., Gillespie, T., Banks, N., Bayırbağ, M. K., Burte, H., Kanai, J. M., & Sami, N. (2020). Deindustrialization in cities of the global south. Area Development and Policy, 5(3), 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. (2018). Heterodoxy as orthodoxy: Prolegomenon for a geographical political economy. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, M. S. Gertler, & D. Wójcik (Eds.), The new Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 159–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., & Hsu, L.-F. (2020). Geopolitics and economic geography: A commentary on Andy Pike’s geographical political economy. International Journal of Urban Sciences.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, S., & O’Neill, P. (2014). An argument with neoliberalism: Australia’s place in a global imaginary. Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(2), 105–130.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, M., Strauss, K., Parker, B., Orzeck, R., Derickson, K., & Bonds, A. (2017). Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for? Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W. C. (2019). Rethinking mechanism and process in the geographical analysis of uneven development. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(3), 226–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W. C., & Lin, G. C. S. (2003). Theorizing economic geographies of Asia. Economic Geography, 79(2), 107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar