3,419
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revisiting inclusion in smart cities: infrastructural hybridization and the institutionalization of citizen participation in Bengaluru’s peripheries

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 29-49 | Received 14 Dec 2020, Accepted 26 May 2021, Published online: 10 Jun 2021

References

  • Aasland, A., & Fløtten, T. (2001). Ethnicity and social exclusion in Estonia and Latvia. Europe-Asia Studies, 53(7), 1023–1049.
  • Allam, Z. (2018). Contextualising the smart city for sustainability and inclusivity. New Design Ideas, 2(2), 124–127.
  • Bhan, G. (2019). Notes on a southern urban practice. Environment and Urbanization, 31(2), 639–654.
  • Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike. (2017). Micro Plan BBMP Ward [1-198]. Retrieved from Open City Urban Data portal (https://opencity.in/pages/latest)
  • Caldeira, T. P. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3–20.
  • Cardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C., & Kitchin, R. (2019). The right to the smart city. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Chakrabarti, P. (2007). Inclusion or exclusion? Emerging effects of middle? Class citizen participation on Delhi's urban poor. IDS Bulletin, 38, 6.
  • Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Coutard, O., & Rutherford, J. (2015). Beyond the networked city: An introduction. In O. Coutard & J. Rutherford (Eds.), Beyond the Networked city (pp. 19–43). Routledge.
  • Datta, A. (2015a). A 100 smart cities, a 100 utopias. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 49–53.
  • Datta, A. (2015b). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city. Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22.
  • Datta, A. (2018). The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India's 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(3), 405–419.
  • De Falco, S., Angelidou, M., & Addie, J. P. D. (2019). From the “smart city” to the “smart metropolis”? building resilience in the urban periphery. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(2), 205–223.
  • Glasmeier, A., & Christopherson, S. (2015). Thinking about smart cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 3–12.
  • Government of India. (2011). Bangalore (Bengaluru Urban Region Population 2011 [census data]. Retrieved from https://www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/388-Bengaluru.html
  • Government of India (GoI), Ministry of Urban Development. (2015). Smart City mission statement and guidelines. Smartnet library, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, GoI. https://smartnet.niua.org/content/2dae72ca-e25b-4575-8302-93e8f93b6bf6
  • Government of India (GoI), Ministry of Urban Development. (2017). Smart City Challenge Round 3: Smart City Proposal Bengaluru. Smartnet library, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, GoI. https://smartnet.niua.org/content/c8fdaabb-767c-4854-befc-9e9966c28282
  • Government of Karnataka, Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate of Census Operations Karnataka. (2011, October). Census of India 2011. District Census Handbook Bangalore. https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2918_PART_B_DCHB_BANGALORE.pdf
  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
  • Harriss, J. (2005). Political participation, representation and the urban poor: Findings from research in Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, March 12, 1041–1054.
  • Hoelscher, K. (2016). The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India. International Area Studies Review, 19(1), 28–44.
  • Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City, 12(3), 303–320.
  • Holston, J. (1991). Autoconstruction in working-class Brazil. Cultural Anthropology, 6(4), 447–465.
  • Idiculla, M. (2017). Who Governs the City? The Powerlessness of City Governments and the Transformation of Governance in Bangalore. Paper presented at RC21 International conference on “The Ideal City: between myth and reality. Representations, policies,:contradictions and challenges for tomorrow’s urban life”. (pp. 1–29). University of Urbino (Italy).
  • Joo, Y. M., & Tan, T. B. (2020). Smart cities in Asia: An introduction. In smart cities in Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.
  • Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136.
  • Lee, J. Y., Woods, O., & Kong, L. (2020). Towards more inclusive smart cities: Reconciling the divergent realities of data and discourse at the margins. Geography Compass, 14(9), e12504. 1–12.
  • Marvin, S., Luque-Ayala, A., & McFarlane, C. (2015). Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false Dawn? New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Meijer, A. J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 647–656.
  • Moudgal, S. (2019, October 25). Bengaluru lags in Smart City implementation. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/bengaluru-lags-in-smart-city-implementation/articleshow/71749676.cms
  • Nagendra, H., Nagendran, S., Paul, S., & Pareeth, S. (2012). Graying, greening and fragmentation in the rapidly expanding Indian city of Bangalore. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(4), 400–406.
  • Pellissery, S., Chakradhar, A., Iyer, D., Lahiri, M., Ram, N., Mallick, N., … Harish, P. (2016). Regulation in crony capitalist state: The case of planning laws in bangalore. Der öffentliche Sektor (The Public Sector): Planning, Land, and Property: Framing Spatial Politics in Another age of Austerity, 42(1), 110.
  • Shaw, A. (2017). Metropolitan governance and social inequality in India. In Inequality and governance in the metropolis (pp. 57-76). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25.
  • Smitha, K. C. (2010). New forms of urban localism: Service delivery in Bangalore. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(8), 73–77.
  • Sudhira, H. S., Ramachandra, T. V., & Subrahmanya, M. B. (2007). Bangalore. Cities, 24(5), 379–390.
  • Van Dijk, J. A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221–235.
  • Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883–898.
  • Verrest, H., & Pfeffer, K. (2019). Elaborating the urbanism in smart urbanism: Distilling relevant dimensions for a comprehensive analysis of smart city approaches. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1328–1342. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10. 1080/1369118X.2018.1424921
  • World Population Review. (2020, December 12). Bangalore population 2020 [UN World Urbanization Prospects]. Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/bangalore-population