Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: a tale of four smart cities

References

• Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions. (2017). Urban living labs: A living lab way of working. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• An, Y., & Wan, L. (2018). Modelling industrial firm relocation with impacts of spatial dependence. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22(1), 80–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbies, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, G. (2013). ‘Smartness’ from the bottom up: A few insights into the Amsterdam Smart City programme. Metering International, 3, 98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bouw, M., & Thoma, D. (2019). Economic resilience through community-driven (real estate) development in Amsterdam-Noord. In M. de Lange & M. de Waal (Eds.), The Hackable city (pp. 119–127). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., & Voytenko, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., & Cowley, R. (2016). Interrogating urban experiments. Urban Geography, 40(2), 1441–1450.
   Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(5), 813–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A. (2016). Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 724–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Amsterdam. (2020). Tram and metro network. https://maps.amsterdam.nl/trammetro/?LANG=en
   Google Scholar
• City of Portland. (1993). Global warming reduction strategy. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2019-08/global-warming-reduction-strategy-nov-1993.pdf
   Google Scholar
• City of Portland. (2020a). 2020 open data handbook. https://www.smartcitypdx.com/open-data-program
   Google Scholar
• City of Portland. (2020b). Addressing the digital divide work group charter. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5967c18bff7c50a0244ff42c/t/5f6bd90d0c2b2e695e3d7acc/1600903438158/COVID-19+Response+Digital+Divide+Work+Group+Charter+August+2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• City of Portland. (2021). Portland bureau of transportation. Tilikum crossing: Bridge of the people webpage. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/68548
   Google Scholar
• Coalition of Communities of Color and Portland State University. (2008). Communities of color in Multnomah county: An unsettling profile. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/civic/article/505484
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., & Caprotti, F. (2019). Smart city as anti-planning in the UK. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(3), 428–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., Joss, S., & Dayot, Y. (2018). The smart city and its publics: Insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research & Practice, 11, 53–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, M., & de Waal, M. (2019). The Hackable city: Digital media and collaborative city-making in the network society. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3.
   Google Scholar
• Dembksi, S. (2020). Organic approaches to planning as densification strategy? The challenge of legal contextualisation in Buiksloterham, Amsterdam. The Town Planning Review, 91(3), 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembski, S. (2013). Case study Amsterdam Buiksloterham, the Netherlands: The challenge of planning organic transformation. Context Report, 2. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1523659/124693_CONTEXT_Report_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Statistics Office of Ho Chi Minh City – DSO. (2019). Statistical yearbook of Ho Chi Minh City 2018. Ho Chi Minh City: DSO.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Escobar, O., Gilchrist, A., Agger, A., Henderson, J., van Hulst, M., & van Ostaijen, M. (2019). Socially smart cities: Making a difference in urban neighbourhoods. https://www.smart-urban-intermediaries.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Socially-Smart-Cities-Report-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (2016). The experimental city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• General Statistics Office of Vietnam - GSO. (2019). Statistical yearbook of Vietnam 2019. Hanoi: GSO.
   Google Scholar
• Giffinger, R., & Lü, H. (2015). The smart city perspective: A necessary change from technical to urban innovation. Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Gladek, E., van Odijk, S., Theuws, P., & Herder, A. (2016). Transitioning Amsterdam to a circular city: Circular Buiksloterham vision and ambition. https://buiksloterham.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, A. Oregon public broadcasting. https://www.opb.org/article/2020/12/31/an-exceptional-year-or-the-new-normal-a-pandemic-protests-and-then-the-state-caught-fire/
   Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., & Wathne, W. (2019). Smart cities as strategic actors: Insights from EU lighthouse projects in Stavanger, Stockholm, and Nottingham. In A. Karvonen, F. Cugurullo, & F. Caprotti F (Eds.), Inside smart cities: Place, politics and urban innovation. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10. 4324/9781351166201-7/smart-cities-strategic-actors-h%C3%A5vard-haarstad-marikken-wathne
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, G. (2015). Beyond the corporate smart city? Glimpses of other possibilities of smartness. In S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, & C. McFarlane (Eds.), Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false Dawn? Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10. 4324/9781315730554-11/beyond-corporate-smart-city-robert-hollands
   Google Scholar
• Joss, S., Sengers, F., Schraven, D., Caprotti, F., & Dayot, Y. (2019). The smart city as global discourse: Storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M., & Lee, C. (2015). Smart city: A comparative perspective. Journal of Korean Regional Development Association, 27(4), 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., & van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: Experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. de Vries (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research. Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781446268247.n17
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, C., & Martin, K. (2015). Portland's smart cities evolution. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5967c18bff7c50a0244ff42c/t/5ad9235ef950b729ea0aeca6/1524179809443/isocarp-review-article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2019). Toward a genuinely humanizing smart urbanism. In C. Paolo, F. D. Cesare, & K. Rob (Eds.), The right to the smart city (pp. 193–204). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10. 1108/9781787691391
   Google Scholar
• Kluiving, S., de Ridder, T., van Dasselaar, M., Roozen, S., & Prins, M. (2016). Soil archives of a Fluvisol: Subsurface analysis and soil history of the medieval city centre of Vlaardingen, the Netherlands – an integral approach. SOIL, 2(2), 271–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourtit, K., Elmlund, P., & Nijkamp, P. (2020). The urban data deluge: Challenges for smart urban planning in the third data revolution. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(4), 445–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Arts, J., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Examining social outcomes from urban transport infrastructure: Long-term consequences of spatial changes and varied interests at multiple levels. Sustainability, 12(15), 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2017). History of transport policy of Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L., & Gil-Garcia, J. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J., Clifton, K., Broach, J., & Shandobil, B. (2018). Environmental and equity scenarios for alternative fuel vehicle ownership and use in the Portland region. Portland: Transportation Research and Education Centre. Portland State University. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1181&context=trec_reports
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, M. (2020). Implementation report of smart ticketing system project. Ho Chi Minh City: Mott Macdonald.
   Google Scholar
• Management Centre of Public Transport - MCPT. (2018, August). Public transport in Ho Chi Minh City: Situation, orientation and solutions. Presentation for the consultation workshop of global future cities programme.
   Google Scholar
• March, H. (2018). The smart city and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: Any room for dialogue with degrowth? Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1694–1703.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., & Söderström, O. (2017). On alternative smart cities: From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City, 21, 312–328.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2018). Quantified street: Smart governance of urban safety. Information Polity, 23(1), 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, L., & Bolici, R. (2017). How to become a smart city: Learning from Amsterdam. In A. Bisello, D. Vettorato, R. Stephens, & P. Elisei (Eds.), Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions. SSPCR 2015. Green Energy and Technology. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44899-2_15
   Google Scholar
• Mosannenzadeh, F., & Vettoriato, D. (2014). Defining smart city. A conceptual framework based on keyword analysis. TeMa—Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6, 683–694.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S. (2004). Amsterdam as a creative cultural knowledge city: Some conditions. Built Environment, 30(3), 225–234.
   Google Scholar
• Nations Online Project. (n.d.). Map of Oregon. https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/USA/oregon_map.htm
   Google Scholar
• Noori, N., Hoppe, T., & de Jong, M. (2020). Classifying pathways for smart city development: Comparing design, governance and implementation in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi. Sustainability, 12(10), 4030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). 1st OECD roundtable on smart cities and inclusive growth. Author. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/OECD-Roundtable-on-Smart-Cities-and-Inclusive-Growth_Issues-Note.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ordinance 188356. (2017). City of Portland “addressing the digital divide work group charter”. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5967c18bff7c50a0244ff42c/t/5f6bd90d0c2b2e695e3d7acc/1600903438158/COVID-19(Response ( Digital ( Divide ( Work ( Group ( Charter ( August(2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• People Committee of Ho Chi Minh City. (2017). Decision No. 6179/QĐ-UBND on 23 November 2017 on the Smart City Strategy of Ho Chi Minh City during 2017-2020 period with vision toward 2025. HCMC. CPC.
   Google Scholar
• Phibbs, S., York, E., Ponco, J., Sifuentes, J., & Irvin, V. (2019). Building social resilience through public health practice in Oregon. Oregon Health Authority. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYENVIRONMENTS/CLIMATECHANGE/Documents/2020/Social-Resilience-Study-Brief-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, E. (2018, July). Portland installs smart city sensors to reduce traffic. https://www.engineering.com/BIM/ArticleID/17244/Portland-Installs-Smart-City-Sensors-to-Reduce-Traffic-Deaths.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Portland Bureau of Transportation. (2020a). E-Scooter findings report. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020/pbot_e-scooter_report_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Portland Bureau of Transportation. (2020b). Saving lives with safe streets. Vision zero traffic crash report 2019. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/2019-traffic-crash-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2013). Decision 568/QĐ-TTg on 8 April 2013 on the approval of transportation master plan of Ho Chi Minh City to 2020 with vision toward 2030.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Park, H., Kim, M., & Song, J. (2005). Public transport reforms in Seoul: Innovations motivated by funding crisis. Journal of Public Transportation, 8(5), 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• PwC. (2019). Creating the smart cities of the future, A three-tier development model for digital transformation of citizen services. PWC. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/assets/creating-the-smart-cities-of-the-future.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Sengers, F., Spaeth, P., Xie, L., Cheshmehzangi, A., & de Jong, M. (2019). Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 258–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimerink, L. (2016). How Amsterdam turned a polluted industrial site into its most interesting neighbourhood. https://www.eco-business.com/news/how-amsterdam-turned-a-polluted-industrial-site-into-its-most-interesting-neighborhood/
   Google Scholar
• Repette, P., Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Sell, D., & Costa, E. (2021). The evolution of city-as-a-platform: Smart urban development governance with collective knowledge-based platform urbanism. Land, 10(1), 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., Boterman, W., van Gent, W., & Majoor, S. (2016). Amsterdam in the 21st century: Geography, housing, spatial development and politics. Cities, 52, 103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Spaeth, P., & Raven, R. (2018). Smart city construction: Towards an analytical framework for smart urban living labs. In S. Marvin, H. Bulkeley, Q. Mai, K. McCormick, & P. Voytenko (Eds.), Urban living labs: Experimentation and socio-technical transitions (pp. 74–88). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seoul Institute. (2015). Seoul statistical series.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonite, T. (2020). Wired magazine. “Portland face recognition ban twist on smart cities”. https://www.wired.com/story/portlands-face-recognition-ban-twist-smart-cities/
   Google Scholar
• Smart City PDX. (2021). City of Portland. https://www.smartcitypdx.com /
   Google Scholar
• SMG. (2006). Cheonggyecheon restoration white paper. Seoul: Author.
   Google Scholar
• SMG. (2015). Sync Seoul. Seoul: Author.
   Google Scholar
• SMG. (2017). Reforming public transportation in Seoul. Seoul: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S., & Kyung, K. (2005). Seoul bus reform and conflict management. Seoul: Seoul Institute.
   Google Scholar
• UK FCDO. (2019). Term of references “development of smart ticketing system for public transportation network in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam”. Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2018). Global future cities programme. City context report. Ho Chi Minh City: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2019a). City context report. Ho Chi Minh City: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2019b). The future of smart and inclusive cities. Author. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2019/10/future_of_ap_cities_report_2019_compressed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., Baines, J., & Taylor, C. N. (2013). Principles for ethical research involving humans: Ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(4), 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Population Review. (2021). https://worldpopulationreview.com/en/us-cities/portland-or-population
   Google Scholar
• Yi, C., Lee, C., & Jung, Y. (2017). Developing transport infrastructure in Seoul: Planning implications on Jakarta, Manila, and Ho Chi Minh city. Seoul: Seoul Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar