The Impact of the Fuel Price Policy on the Demand for Diesel Passenger Cars in Korean Cities

References

• Bates, J. 1988. Econometric Issues in SP Analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22 (1): 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J. & Terzis, G. 2000. Stated Preference and the Ecological Fallacy. in Ortuzar, J. de D. (Ed.) Stated Preference Modelling Techniques. London: PTRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. & S. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge. MA.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkovec, J. 1985. Forecasting Automobile Demand Using Disaggregate Choice Models. Transportation Research B: Methodological 19 (4): 315–329.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, R. K. 1996. Energy Demand and Environmental Implications in Urban Transport - Case of Delhi, Atmosphere Environment 30 (3): 403–412.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. & Gunn, H. 1993. The Strengths and Weakness of Travel Demand Model Systems for Assessing Emission Reduction Policies. The Science of The Total Environment 134 (1–3): 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Cirillo, C., di Torino, P., Daily, A. & Lindveld, K. 2000. Eliminating Bias Due to the Repeated Measurements Problem in SP Data, in Ortuzar, J. de D. (Ed.) Stated Preference Modeling Techniques. London: PTRC.
   Google Scholar
• DeShanzo, J. R. & Fermo, G. 2002. Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment. 2004. Environment White Paper. Department of Environment, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Earnhart, D. 2002. Combining Revealed and Stated Data to Examine Housing Decisions Using Discrete Choice Analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 51: 143–169.
   Google Scholar
• Espey, M. 1996. Watching the Fuel Gauge: An International Model of Automobile Fuel Economy. Energy Economics 18: 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, D. J. & Glaister, S. 2002. The Demand for Automobile Fuel: A Survey of Elasticity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2002. LIMDEP Version 7.0 User’s Manual Revised Edition. New York and Sydney: Econometric Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 1985. An Econometric Model of Vehicle Use in the Household Sector. Transportation Research B: Methodological 19 (4): 303–313.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 1994. Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practise. Transportation 21: 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, J. 2004. The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Change Analysis: The Case of Diesel Vehicle Policy in Korea. Korean Public Administration Review 39 (1): 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C.-M. 2002. A Study on the Part-Worth Estimation of Officetel Building Using the Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Korea Planners Association 37(3): 183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H. C. 2003. Statistical Analysis Methods for the Cognitive Map Building. Media Research Newsletter No 8: 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F. & Preston, J. 2004. Transport Policy Impact on Residential Location. International Review of Public Administration 9(1): 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F. & Preston, J. 2005. The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice Behavior. Urban Studies 42(9): 1621–1636.
   Google Scholar
• Kocur, G., Alder, T., Hyman, W. & Audet, B. 1982. Guide to Forecasting Travel Demand with Direct Utility Assessment. US Department of Transportation. Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Report No UMTA-NH-11–0001–82–1. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Institute of Public Finance et al. 2004. Adjustment of Relative Energy Price according to the Sale Permission of Diesel Cars. Proceedings for the Public Hearing. the Conference Hall of the Korea Association of Tax Accountants, Seoul, 14, September 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade. 2002. Proper Fuel Price Ratio. Seoul: KIET.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Ahn, J., Lee, J.-D. & Shin, H. 2004. Demand Analysis of the Home Ubiquitous Network Services Using Conjoint Method. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 7(1): 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Leitham, S, McQuaid, R. W. & Nelson, J. D. 2000. The Influence of Transport on Industrial Location Choice: A Stated Preference Experiment. Transport Research A 34: 515–535.
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J, Hensher, D. A. & Swait, J. D. 2000. Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannering, F. L. & Train, K. 1985. Recent Directions in Automobile Demand Modeling. Transportation Research B: Methodological 19(4): 265–274.
   Google Scholar
• Morikawa, T. 1989. Incorporating Stated Preference Data in Travel Demand Analysis. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J.J. & Stevens, T.H. 2004. Contingent Valuation, Hypothetical Bias and Experimental Economics. Proceedings of NAREA-CAES Conference. Halifax, Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliara, F., Preston, J. & Kim, J. H. 2002. Modeling Residential Location Choice Behaviour. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference in 2004. Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rouwendal, J. & de Vries, F. 1999. The Taxation of Drivers and the Choice of Car Fuel. Energy Economics 21: 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, L., Marie-Lilliu, C. & Fulton, L. 2002. Diesels in Europe: Analysis of Characteristics, Usage Patterns, Energy Savings and CO2 Emission Implications. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36(2): 305–340.
   Google Scholar
• The Department of Environment. 2004. The Environmental White Paper. The Department of Environment. Seoul. Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Marsh, A., Wardman, M. & Niner, P. 2002. Modelling Tenants’ Choices in the Public Rented Sector: A Stated Preference Approach. Urban Studies 39: 665–688.
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, M. 1988. A Comparison of Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Travel Behavior. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22: 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, H. K. 2005. Keeping a Very Close Watch of the Car Makers on the Increase of the Diesel price. Munhwa-Ilbo. 2005. 1. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Timmermans, H. Borgers, A. and Wang, D. 2004. Modeling Traveler Choice Behavior Using the Concepts of Relative Utility and Relative Interest. Transportation Research Part B. 38(3): 215–234.
   Google Scholar
• www.donga.com/fbin/output?lifenews=home&f=nls&n=200412240243
   Google Scholar
• www.eagleaid.com/dsltoc.htm
   Google Scholar
• www.ricardo.com
   Google Scholar
• www.oilandgas.co.kr/mainnewscenter/mnu_economic-News/
   Google Scholar
• www.2kmib.co.kr
   Google Scholar
• http://ecojustice.or.kr/action/energy/special_diesel.htm
   Google Scholar
• http://economy.hankooki.com/lpage/editorial/200305/
   Google Scholar