Linking Cooperative Arrangements and Economic Development Strategies: An Institutional Collection Action Framework

References

• Andranovich, Greg. 1995. Achieving consensus in public decision making: Applying interest-based problem solving to the challenges of intergovernmental cooperation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 31: 429–445.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, Simon A. 2009. Regional integration through contracting networks: An empirical analysis of institutional collection action. Urban Affairs Review 44(3): 378–402.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, Patricia S. 1997. Local intergovernmental agreements: Strategies for cooperation. International City/County Management Association Management Information System Report. 29(7), July.
   Google Scholar
• Bartik, Timothy J. 2005. Solving the problem of economic development incentives. Growth and Change 36: 139–166.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, Edward J. and Ted K. Bradshaw. 2001. Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, Ann, O’M. 1988. Competition for economic development among southeastern cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly 23(June): 511–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, Ted. 2000. Complex community development projects: Collaboration, comprehensive programs, and community coalitions in complex society. Community Development Journal 35(2): 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, Ted. K. & Edward J. Blakely. 1999. What are “third-wave” state economic development efforts? From incentives to industrial policy. Economic Development Quarterly 13(3): 229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, Terry F. 2001. The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 90–105.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Jered B., Kelly LeRoux, and Manoj Shrestha. 2009. Institutional ties, transaction costs, and external service production. Urban Affairs Review 44(3): 403–427.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, Tim. 2002. Beyond the entrepreneurial city: municipal capitalism in San Diego. Journal of Urban Affairs 24(5): 565–581.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Terry N. and Lorna C. Ferguson. 1983. City money. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Susan E. and Gary L. Gail. 1992. The next wave: Postfederal local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly 6(2): 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Susan E. and Gary L. Gail. 1998. The work of cities. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Susan E., and Rich, M. J. 1985. “Making money work: The new urban policy arena.” In Research in Urban Policy, Vol. 1, edited by T. N. Clark. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Susan E. and Martin Saiz. 1996. “Economic development and infrastructure policy.” In Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis, 6th edition, edited by Virginia Gray and Herbert Jacob. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clingermayer, James C., & Richard C. Feiock. 2001. Institutional constraints and policy choice: An exploration of local governance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, Peter K. 1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard. 1991. The effects of economic development policy on local economic growth. American Journal of Political Science 35: 643–55.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard C. 2002. A quasi-market framework for local economic development Competition, Journal of Urban Affairs 24(2): 123- 42.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard. 2004. “Introduction: Regionalism and institutional collective action.” In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation, edited by Richard C. Feiock. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard C. 2007. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 29(1): 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard C. and Jae-Hoon Kim. 2000. Form of government, administrative organization, and local economic development policy. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 11(1): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard C., Annette Steinacker, & Hyung Jun Park. 2009. Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review March/April: 256–70.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Ronald C. 1997. The effects of state and local public services on economic development. New England Economic Review March/April: 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, Arnold, Gary P. Green and Tsz Man Kwong. 1992. What’s a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. The Western Political Quarterly 45(3):677–699.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Perseus Book Group
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, Bernard J. and Lynne B. Sagalyn. 1989. Downtown Inc. How America rebuilds cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, Edward G. and Terrence Kayser. 1993. Competition and cooperation in economic development: A study of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly 7(1): 63–78
   Google Scholar
• Green, Gary P. and Arnold Fleischmann. 1991. Promoting economic development: A comparison of central cities, suburbs, and nonmetropolitan communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly 27(1): 145–154
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Tim, and Phil Hubbard. 1998. The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime and representation. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Christopher V. 2009. Prospects for and barriers to local government joint ventures. State and Local Government Review 41(2), 108–119
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Christopher V. 2010. Competition and cooperation: Local government joint ventures for economic development, Journal of Urban Affairs. 32(2): 253–275.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Martin and Max Neiman. 2004. “Courting business: Competition for economic development among cities.” In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation, edited by Richard C. Feiock. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koven, Steven and Thomas Lyons. 2003. Economic Development: Strategies for State and Local Practice. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, Steven B., David Freshwater, and Anil Rupasingha. 2002. Factors influencing local government cooperation in rural areas: Evidence from the Tennessee Valley. Economic Development Quarterly 16(2): 138–154.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, Marc. 1987. Downtown redevelopment as an urban growth strategy: A critical appraisal o the Baltimore renaissance. Journal of Urban Affairs 9(2): 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Paul G. 1998. Regionalism and representation: Measuring and assessing representation in metropolitan planning organizations. Urban Affairs Review 33(6): 839–854.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Paul G. 2001. Looking outward or turning inward? Motivations for development decisions in central cities and suburbs. Urban Affairs Review 36(5): 696–720.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Paul G. 2002. Offering incentives for new development: The role of city social status, politics, and local growth experience. Journal of Urban Affairs 24(2): 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, John. Rachel B. Whaley, and Kyle Crowder. 1997. The character and consequences of growth regimes - An assessment of 20 years of research. Urban Affairs Review, 32(5), 603–630.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, John, and Harvey Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, Rowan, and Donald Rosdil. 1995. From boosterism to qualitative growth: Classifying economic development strategies. Urban Affairs Review 30(6): 868–879.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, J. K. and Nesvig, V. 1993. Collaboration and community: How small towns in the Dakotas organized for leadership and economic development. Small Town, Winter: 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Neiman, Max and Keith Fernandez. 1999. Measuring local economic development policy and the influence of economic conditions. International Journal of Economic Development 1(3): 311–339.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, Samuel and Mark Rosentraub. 1997. Dimensions of interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association 63(2): 205–19.
   Google Scholar
• Olberding, Julie C. 2002. Diving into the “third waves” of regional governance and economic development strategies: A study of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. metropolitan areas. Economic Development Quarterly 16(3): 251–272.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Alan, H. and Peter Fisher. 2004. The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association 70: 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, Paul. 1986. The market for industry: Where angels fear to tread. Policy Studies Review 5(3): 624–33.
   Google Scholar
• Post, Stephanie S. and Robert M. Stein. 2000. State economies, metropolitan governance, and urban-suburban economic dependence. Urban Affairs Review 36(1): 46–60.
   Google Scholar
• Post, Stephanie S. 2004. “Metropolitan area governance and institutional collective action.” In Metropolitan governance: conflict, competition, and cooperation, edited by Richard C. Feiock. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rast, Joel and Virginia Carlson. 2006. When Boeing landed in Chicago: Lessons for regional economic development. State and Local Government Review 38(1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, Laura A. and Raymond A. Fasenfest. 2004. Local economic development in the United States and Canada. The American Review of Public Administration 34(3): 277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, Laura and Raymond A. Rosenfeld. 2002. The civic culture of local economic Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Kent A. 1995. Downtown redevelopment strategies in the United States: An end of the century assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(4): 429–437.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Herbert J. 1988. Shoot anything that flies; claim anything that falls: Conversations with economic development practitioners. Economic Development Quarterly 2(3): 236–251.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., and Ronald K. Vogel. 2000. Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review 32(3): 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Elaine B. 1990. Urban politics and administration: From service delivery to economic development. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, G. R., and Nelson Wikstrom. 2000. Metropolitan government and governance: Theoretical perspectives, empirical analysis, and the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, Gregory D. 1989. Unequal partnerships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, Robert K. & Norman Nezelkewicz. 2002. Metropolitan planning organizations and the new regionalism: The case of Louisville. Publius, 32(1), 107–131.
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, J. A., and John C. Lammers. 1991. The art of growth: ties between development organizations and the performing arts. Urban Affairs Quarterly 26(3): 376–393.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, Harold. L., Coit C. Ford, and Edward Hill. 1994. Evaluating the success of urban success stories. Urban Studies 31(6): 835–850.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, Harold and David Spitzley.1996. The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly 10(2): 115–150.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, Gerald. 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar