Barriers to Collaborating Activities among Policy Actors in Industry-Academia Collaboration Policies

References

• Atherton, M.A. and Austin, P. 1996. Experiences of ISO 9000 with small firms in building services. Facilities 14(10/11):25–27
   Google Scholar
• Bogason, P. 2000. Public Policy and Local Governance: Institutions in Postmodern Society. Gloucester, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, J. and Rantisi, N. 2003. The relational turn in economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 3:109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, D. and Howells, J. 1992. Technology Transfer in Europe: Public and Private Networks, London: Belhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. and Desrochers, P. 2004. Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva 42:105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Garofoli, G. and Musyck, B. 2003. Innovation policies for SMEs: An overview of policy instruments. In Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., Nauwelaers, C. and Todtling, F. (Eds) Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises. (pp. 119–138), Gloucester, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geenhuizen, M. van., Nijakamp, P. and Rijckenberg, H. 1997. Universities and knowledge-based economic growth: The case of Delft (NL). GeoJournal 41(4):369–77
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1: Power, Property and the State. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, G., Harvie, C. and Lee, H. H. 2002. Korean SMEs in the wake of the financial crisis: Strategies, constraints, and performance in a global economy. Paper no. 50 on CD The 47th International Council for Small Business World Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 16–19 June.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2002. Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and Barrett, S. 1990. Structure and agency in land and property development processes. Urban Studies 27(1):89–104
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. 2005. The Public Policy Process. (4th Ed.) Essex, U.K.: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S. 1998. Technology transfer models across cultures: Brunei-Japan joint ventures. International Journal of Social Economics 25(6/7/8):1189–1198.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, L. H. 2002. Technology transfer. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board/National Research Council. Retrieved 15 November 2006, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/millennium/00114.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. J. 2004. New paradigm for balanced national development. Space and Environment (KRIHS Gazette) 21:1–3. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lambooy, J. G. 2002. Knowledge and urban economic development: An evolutionary perspective. Urban Studies 39(5–6):1019–1035.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. 2000. The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer 25:111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A. 1992. Introduction. In Lundvall, B.-A (Ed.). National System of Innovation. (pp. 1–19). London: Printer Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development (MOEHRD). 2003. Measures to Promote Industry-Academia Collaboration. Seoul (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. 2002. Innovation SMEs and regions: The need for policy intelligence and interactive polices. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14(2):201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Onyx, J. and Bullen, P. 2000. Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36(1):23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. O. 2001. Regional innovation strategies in the knowledge-based economy. GeoJournal 53:29–38
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. 1995. Public Policy. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Picciotto, R. 2004. Background paper: Policy coherence and development. OECD Workshop: Policy Coherence for Development. Paris, May 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J., Jones, M. and Truex, D. 2005. Socio-theoretic accounts of IS: The problem of agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 17(1):133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R., Dodgson, M. 1992. European technology policy evolution: Convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer. Technovation 12(4):223–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rummel, R. J. 1976. Understanding Conflict and War, Vol.2: The Conflict Helix. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Retrieved June 4, 2007 from: http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/TCH.CHAP9.HTM.
   Google Scholar
• Smilor, R.W. and Gibson, D. V. 1991. Technology transfer in multi-organizational environments: The case of R&D consortia. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 38(1):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sandiford, F. and Rossmiller, G. 1996. Many a Slip: Studying Policy Delivery Systems, Paper presented to the Agricultural Economics Society Conference, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 27–30 March.
   Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Schibany A. and Gassler H. 2001. Interactive relations between university and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer 26:255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. 1990. Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools. The Journal of Politics 52(2):510–529.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. F. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology 98(1):1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. H. and Gibson, D. V. 1990. University and industry linkage: The Austin, Texas, study. In Williams, F. and Gibson, D. V. (Eds.) Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar