Understanding and addressing citizens’ perceptions of corruption: the case of Spain

References

• Anderson, C.J., & Tverdova, Y.V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Sciences, 47(1), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M.M. (2011). Discrepancies in perceptions of corruption, or why is Canada so corrupt? Political Science Quarterly, 126(3), 445–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (2005). Scarcity, conflict and cooperation: Essays in the political and institutional economics of development. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blind, P.K. (2007). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues [online]. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan025062.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryner, G.C. (1987). Bureaucratic discretion. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• (CIS) Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas [Center for Sociological Research], (2009). Estudio 2826. Etica Publica y Corrupcion [Study 2826 on public ethics and corruption] [ online]. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=10684
   Google Scholar
• Costas-Pérez, E., Solé-Ollé, A., & Sorribas-Navarro, P. (2011). Corruption scandals, press reporting, and accountability. Evidence From Spanish mayors [online]. Working Paper. Institut d’Economia de Barcelona. Retrieved from http://www.ieb.ub.edu/aplicacio/fitxers/2011/4/Doc2011-9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2000). Administrative discretion: the conundrum wrapped in an enigma. In J. Van Baallen, E. Schwella, & A. Burger (Eds.), Public management and governance: The seventh winelands conference (pp. 249–263). Stellenbosch, SA: University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2005, June). Accountability and responsibility in organizations: The ethics of discretion. Paper presented at the Ethics and integrity in governance conference, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2009). Special Survey (325): Attitude of Europeans towards corruption [online]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_325_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2012). Special Eurobarometer (374), “Corruption”. European Union. Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_374_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graycar, A., & Villa, D. (2011). The loss of governance capacity through corruption. Governance, 24(3), 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M.J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, P.M. (2007). Corruption in contemporary Spain. Political Science & Politics, 40(4), 695–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerez, L., Martín, V., & Pérez, R. (2012). Aproximación a una geografía de la corrupción urbanística en España. Ería, 87, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jos, P. (1993). Empirical corruption research: Beside the (moral) point? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (J-PART), 3(3), 359–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 119–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2010). Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review, 70(5), 801–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitgaard, R., MacLean-Abaroa, R., & Parris, H.L. (1998). A practical approach to dealing with municipal malfeasance (Workshop Paper No. 7) [online]. Retrieved from http://wiki.bezkorupce.cz/_media/wiki/klitgaard-parris-strategie-pro-mesta.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Linde, J., & Erlingsson, G.Ó. (2011). The effect of public perceptions of corruption on system support: The case of Sweden (Work Paper Series 2011:03) [online]. Retrieved from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se/working_papers/2011_3_Linde_Erlingsson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New YorkNY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S. (1978). Political alienation: Reality and reactance. Journal of Social Psychology, 104(1), 115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melgar, N., Rossi, M., & Smith, T.W. (2010). The perception of corruption. International Journal Of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 120–131. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendilow, J. (Ed.). (2012). Public funding of political competition and the future of democracy. Blue Ridge Summit: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. (2008). Disaggregating corruption: A comparison of participation and perceptions in Latin America with a focus on Mexico. Bulletin Of Latin American Research, 27(3), 388–409. doi:10.1111/j.1470-9856.2008.00276.x.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S., & Klesner, J.L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D.C., & Soss, J. (1997). Reading public opinion: The influence of news coverage on perceptions of public sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, A. (2000): ¿Es inevitable la corrupción? [Is corruption inevitable?]. Responsa Iurisperitorium Digesta, 4, 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S. (1997). Introduction: The decline of confidence in government. In J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow & D.C. (Eds.), King: Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, A., Rothstein B., & Teorell, J. (2012). Why anticorruption reforms fail – Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero J., Jiménez F., & Villoria, M. (2012). (Un)sustainable territories. Causes of the speculative bubble in Spain (1996−2010) and its territorial, environmental and socio−political consequences. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 30, 467–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust – An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J.R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, K., & Proeller, I. (2002). The new public management. A perspective from mainland Europe. In K. Mclaughlin, S.P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 163–180). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37(6), 801–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2009). Global corruption barometer [online]. Transparency International, Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/research/gcb/overview
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2010). Global corruption barometer [online]. Transparency International, Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/research/gcb/overview
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law: The bulging pocket makes the easy life. New YorkNY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. (2008). Perceptions of corruption as distrust? Cause and effect in attitudes towards government. In L. Huberts, C. Jurkiewicz, & J. Maesschalck (Eds.), Ethics And integrity and the politics of governance (pp. 215–236). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vanucci, A. (2009). The controversial legacy of ‘Mani Pulite’: A critical analysis of Italian corruption and anti-corruption policies. Bulletin of Italian Politics, 1(2), 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Villoria, M., & Jimenez, F. (2012). La corrupción en España (2004–2010): Datos, percepción y efectos [Corruption in Spain (2004–2010): Data, perception and consequences]. REIS- Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 138, 109–134.
   Google Scholar
• Villoria, M., Van Ryzin, G., & Lavena, C. (2013). Social consequences of government corruption: A study of institutional disaffection in Spain. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar