1,926
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Determinants of job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees: evidence from US federal agencies

&
Pages 63-90 | Received 12 Sep 2013, Accepted 02 Dec 2013, Published online: 04 Apr 2014

References

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.
  • Ashleigh, M., & Prichard, J. (2011). Enhancing trust through training. In R. H. Searle, & D. Skinner (Eds.), Trust and human resource management (pp. 125–138). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Boxx, R. W., Odom, R. Y., & Dunn, M. G. (1991). Organizational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion: An empirical examination within the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 20, 195–206.
  • Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.
  • Bright, L. (2007). Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361–379.
  • Bright, L. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees? The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166.
  • Bright, L. (2013). Where does public service motivation count the most in government work environments? A preliminary empirical investigation and hypotheses. Public Personnel Management, 42(5), 5–26.
  • Burtler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.
  • Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.
  • Cho, Y. J., & Lewis, G. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior: Implications for retaining federal employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 4–23.
  • Crawshaw, J. R. (2011). Career development, progression and trust. In R. H. Searle, & D. Skinner (Eds.), Trust and human resource management (pp. 157–176). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. The Academy of Management Journal, 53, 535–549.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.
  • Farrell, D., & Stamm, C. L. (1988). Meta-analysis of the correlates of employee absence. Human Relations, 41(3), 211–227.
  • French, P. E., & Goodman, D. (2012). An assessment of the current and future state of human resource management at the local government level. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(2), 62–74.
  • Graham, J. W. (1991). Servant-leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral. Leadership Quarterly, 2(2), 105–119.
  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.
  • Jackofsky, E. F., & Peters, L. H. (1983). The hypothesized effects of ability in the turnover process. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 46–49.
  • Jung, C. S., & Rainey, H. G. (2011). Organizational goal characteristics and public duty motivation in US federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 28–47.
  • Kiffin-Peterson, S., & Cordery, J. (2003). Trust, individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 93–116.
  • Kim, S. (2002). Organizational support of career development and job satisfaction: A case study of the Nevada Operations Office of the Department of Energy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(4), 276–294.
  • Kim, S. (2012). Does person-organization fit matter in the public-sector? Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830–840.
  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
  • Lee, G., & Jimenez, B. S. (2011). Does performance management affect job turnover intention in the federal government? The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 168–184.
  • Lewis, G. B., & Cho, Y. J. (2011). The aging of the state government workforce: Trends and implications. American Review of Public Administration, 41(1), 48–60.
  • Light, P. C. (2002). The content of their character: The state of the nonprofit workforce. The Nonprofit Quarterly, 9(3), 6–16.
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1343). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Lovelace, K., & Rosen, B. (1996). Differences in achieving person-organization fit among diverse groups of managers. Journal of Management, 22, 703–723.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crises: The centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust In Organizations (pp. 261–287). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover, causes, consequences, and control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. J. (2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803–832.
  • Munchinsky, P. M., & Monahon, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary verse complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268–277.
  • Nyhan, R. C. (2000). Changing the paradigm: Trust and its role in public sector organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), 87–109.
  • Park, S. M. (2010). The effects of personnel reform systems on Georgia state employees’ attitudes. Public Management Review, 12(3), 403–437.
  • Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2007). Antecedents, mediators, and consequences of affective, normative, and continuance commitment: Empirical tests of commitment effects in federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 197–226.
  • Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142.
  • Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2012). Work motivation and social communication among public managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(13), 2630–2660.
  • Park, S. M., Park, H. J., & Ryu, E. Y. (2013). Determinants of positive job attitude and behavior in the Asian work context: Evidence from Korean central government agencies. Public Management Review, 15(8), 1154–1184.
  • Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
  • Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Pitts, D., Marvel, J., & Fernandez, S. (2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among US Federal Employees. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 751–760.
  • Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychological Association, 55(1), 68–78.
  • Schnake, M. E., Bushardt, S. C., & Spottswood, C. (1984). Internal work motivation and intrinsic job satisfaction: The effects of goal clarity, goal difficulty, participation in goal setting, and task complexity. Group & Organization Studies, 9(2), 201–219.
  • Sims, R. L., & Kroeck, K. G. (1994). The influence of ethical fit on employee satisfaction, commitment and turnover. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 939–948.
  • Soni, V. (2000). A twenty-first-century reception for diversity in the public sector: A case study. Public Administration Review, 60, 395–408.
  • Stazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. The American Reivew of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–624.
  • Tzafrir, S. S., & Enosh, G. (2011). Beyond attitudes and norms: Trust commitment and HR values as triggers of intention to leave. In R. H. Searle, & D. Skinner (Eds.), Trust and human resource management (pp. 289–308). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • US Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), & Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2005). HCAAF Practitioners’ Guide.
  • US Office of Personnel Management (OPM). (2006). The Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework (HCAAF): Systems, Standards and Metrics.
  • Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 33–352.
  • Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service Motivation. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556.
  • Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Weiss, H. M. (2002). Introductory comments: Antecedents of emotional experiences as work. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 1–2.
  • Word, J., & Park, S. M. (2009). Working across the divide: Job involvement in the public and nonprofit sectors. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 103–133.
  • Wright, B. E. (2004). The role of work context in work motivation: A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 59–78.
  • Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person-organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502–521.
  • Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Public organization and mission valence: When does mission matter? Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44.
  • Wright, B. R., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the public sector: Does structure matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 75–89.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.