The New Public Management in hybrid settings: New challenges for performance measures

References

• Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2013). How Performance Measurement Systems support managerial actions in networks: Evidence from an Italian case study. Public Organization Review: Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0264-5
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, K., & Kouzmin, A. (1999). ‘Naming the Rose’: New public management discourse in the Brazilian context. International Review of Public Administration, 4, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 679–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & van Doren, W. (2003). Performance measurement and management in public sector organisations. In T. Bovaird & E. Lofler (Eds.), Public management and governance (pp. 151–164). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Performance and accountability—a theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review: Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In M. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 897–922, 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’. Public Administration, 87, 892–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. M., & Palmer, B. (1992). Developing performance monitoring in public sector organizations (pp. 1–35). The Management Centre: University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• James, O. (2001). New public management in the UK: Enduring legacy or fatal remedy? International Review of Public Administration, 6, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., & Provan, K. G. (2006). The control of public networks. International Public Management Journal, 9, 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., & Provan, K. G. (2009). Towards and exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 87, 440–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2001). Public management of hybrid organizations: Governance of quasi-autonomous executive agencies. International Public Management Journal, 4, 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2006). Networks, network governance, and networked networks. International Review of Public Administration, 11, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., & Koliba, C. (2013). Transformations towards new public governance: Can the new paradigm handle complexity? International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kurunmäki, L., & Miller, P. (2006). Modernizing government: The calculating self, hybridization and performance measurement. Financial Accountability and Management, 22, 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & English, L. (1997). Performance information and programme evaluation in the Australian public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10, 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2008). The NPM agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability and Management, 24, 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. & Yoo, D. S. (2012). The adoption of collaborative governance institutions: The EPA-States Performance Partnership Agreements (PPAS). International Review of Public Administration, 17, 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Leishman, F., Cope, S., & Starie, P. (1995). Reforming the police in Britain: New public management, policy networks and a tough ‘old bill’. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8, 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2012). Citizen participation in local budgeting: Mechanisms, political support, and city manager’s moderating role. International Review of Public Administration, 17, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M., & Keast, R. L. (2007). Evaluating network arrangements: Toward revised performance measures. Public Performance & Management Review, 30, 574–597.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. International Review of Public Administration, 66, 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L., & O’Learly, T. (2008). Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting Organizations and Society, 33, 942–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2004). Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. (2013). Citizen participation in visioning a progressive city: A case study of Albany 2030. International Review of Public Administration, 18, 139–161.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8, 377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollanen, R. M. (2005). Performance measurement in municipalities: Empirical evidence in Canadian context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2003). Evaluating the audit explosion. Law and Policy, 25, 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Lemaire, R. H. (2012). Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice. Public Administration Review, 72, 638–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., Leroux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72, 442–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Walsh, P. (2004). Collaboration of public sector agencies: Reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17, 621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in model local government. Public Administration, 79, 297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. (2009). Exploring the ambiguity of hybrid organizations: A stakeholders approach. Financial Accountability and Management, 25, 353–366.
   Google Scholar
• Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., & Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88, 528–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 427–454.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel, F., & Modell, S. (2014). From new public management to new public governance? Hybridization and implications for public sector consumerism. Financial Accountability and Management, 30, 175–205.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar