A dynamic performance management approach to support local strategic planning

References

• Ammons, D. (2001). Municipal Benchmarks. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, I. (1999). Cities and Competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 795–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving Performance and Fostering Accountability in the Public Sector through System Dynamics Modeling: from an ‘External’ to an ‘Internal’ Perspective. System Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 361–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2012). Enhancing Performance Management and Sustainable Organizational Growth through System Dynamics Modeling. In S. N. Groesser & R. Zeier (Eds.), Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations: Concepts, Model-Based Approaches, and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer-Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Rivenbank, W. C. (2012). Using System Dynamics to Enhance Performance Management in Local Government: An Application to Residential Refuse Collection. APPAM Fall Research Conference, Baltimore, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Williams, D. (2015). Applying System Dynamics Modeling To Foster a Cause-and-Effect Perspective in Dealing with Behavioral Distortions Associated with a City’s Performance Measurement Programs. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 395–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., Winch, G. W., & Tomaselli, S. (2008). Management Simulation as an Instrument to Aid Turning “Stunted Growth” Round in Family Businesses. Sinergie, 75, 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing Performance. International Comparisons. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2002). On the Concept of Territorial Competitiveness: Sound or Misleading? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2395–2411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavenago, D., & Trivellato, B. (2010). Organising Strategic Spatial Planning: Experiences from Italian Cities. Space and Polity, 14(2), 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Comune di Caltagirone (2004). Strategic Plan of the city of Caltagirone ( in Italian). Retrieved from Web site: http://www.comune.caltagirone.ct.it/images/stories/comune/documenti/Piano_strategico_sicurezza/piano_strategico.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de Geus, A. P. (1988). Planning as Learning. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 66, 70–74.
   Google Scholar
• De Lancer Julnes, P. & Holzer, M. (2014). Performance Measurement: Building Theory, Improving Practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., & Sum, N. L. (2000). An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong’s Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter) Urban Competition. Urban Studies, 37(12), 2287–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban Dynamics. Pegasus: Waltham.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J., & Richardson, G. P. (2011). How Small System Dynamics Models can help the Public Policy Process. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 22–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Counsell, C. (2004). Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A., & Ni, A. (2005). Have Cities Shifted to Outcome-Oriented Performance Reporting? A Content Analysis of City Budgets. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(2), 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., & Rivenbark, W. (2011). Performance Budgeting for State ad Local Government. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Mac, Donald R., & Andersen, D. (2013). Simulation and Managerial Decision Making: a Double Loop Learning Framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lever, W. (1999). Competitive Cities in Europe. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 1029–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2000). The Reform of Metropolitan Governance. Retrieved from Web site: http://78.41.128.130/dataoecd/3/17/1918016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2001). Cities for Citizens. Improving Metropolitan Governance. OECD Publications Service: Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1995, May/June). The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, p. 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy. International Regional Science Review, 1–2, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Razumeyko, N. (2011), Strategic Planning Practices in North-West Russia. European Influences, Challenges and Future Perspectives, in: Adams N. – Cotella G. – Nunes R., Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Building on EU Enlargement (pp. 402–421), New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. P. (1995). Loop polarity, loop dominance, and the concept of dominant polarity. System Dynamics Review, 11(1), 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricz, R., & Salamin G. (2010). Handbook for the National Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union. The Case of Hungary, Ministry for National Development and Economy. Republic of Hungary. Retrieved from Web site: http://regionalispolitika.kormany.hu/download/7/8a/10000/TA%20K%C3%A9zik%C3%B6nyv_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. (2008). From Measurement to Management: Breaking through the Barriers to State and Local Performance. Public Administation Review, 68, 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tanese, A., Di Filippo E. & Rennie R. (2006), La Pianificazione Strategica per lo Sviluppo dei Territori (“Strategic Planning for Regional Development”). Rubbettino. Retrieved from Web site: http://db.formez.it/fontinor.nsf/d81804b877cf1665c1256b73004f60fd/99E50A7F17A9A00DC125732500394326/$file/Manuale%20Pianificazione%20strategica%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme, E. F. (1999). Qualitative vs Quantitative Modelling: The Evolving Balance. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(4), 422–428. doi:10.2307/3010462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar