The influence of trust on environmental behavior: evidence from South Korea

References

• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi-Usui, M., Vinken, H., & Kuribayashi, A. (2003). Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: An international comparison. Research in Human Ecology, 10, 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271–294.10.2307/2082425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, R. D., & Klein, R. (1999). Harvesting experience: A reappraisal of the U.S. climate change action plan. Policy Sciences, 32, 133–161.10.1023/A:1004523203325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 7–71.10.1257/.42.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. S., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465–480.10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R., & Van Liere, K. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.10.1111/0022-4537.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1973). Moral education: Study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1998). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q., & Knowles, S. (2004). Social capital and national environmental performance: A cross-sectional analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 13, 336–370.10.1177/1070496504271417
   Google Scholar
• Groothuis, P. A., & Miller, G. A. (1997). The role of social distrust in risk-benefit analysis: A study of the siting of a hazardous waste disposal facility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15, 241–257.10.1023/A:1007757326382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, J., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Lori, Strife, Susie, & Twine, Wayne. (2010). Environmental perceptions of rural South African residents: The complex nature of environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 525–541.10.1080/08941920903357782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2005). Enabling sustainable production-consumption systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 33, 241–75.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. (2008). The citizen-consumer hybrid: Ideological tensions and the case of Whole Foods Market. Theory and Society, 37, 229–270.10.1007/s11186-007-9058-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. (2010). Investigating the influence of social costs and benefits of environmental policies through social capital theory. Policy Sciences, 43, 229–244.10.1007/s11077-009-9107-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57, 28–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Malesios, C., & Botetzagias, I. (2009). The influence of social capital on willingness to pay for the environment among European citizens. European Societies, 11, 511–530.10.1080/14616690802624168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Moon, S. (2012). Determinants of the pro-environmental behavior of Korean immigrants in the U.S. International Review of Public Administration, 17, 99–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260.10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Korea Statistics. (2012). Explore Korea through statistics 2012. Seoul: Statistics Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Korean Statistical Information Services. (2013). Annual population survey. Retrieved from www.kostat.go.kr.
   Google Scholar
• Midden, C. J. H., & Ritsema, B. S. M. (1983). The meaning of normative processes for energy conservation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 37–55.10.1016/0167-4870(83)90017-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S., & Ko, K. (2013). Act in good faith? The effectiveness of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. International Review of Public Administration, 18, 163–184.10.1080/12294659.2013.10805268
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Robert, Bord, R., Yarnal, B., & Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1–17.10.1111/ssqu.2002.83.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, M. E. (1981). Consumers' attitudes toward energy conservation. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 108–131.10.1111/josi.1981.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807763
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228.10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J. (1998). Trust and waste management information expectation versus observation. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 307–320.10.1080/136698798377079
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, M. & Stycos, M. (2002). Immigrant environmental behaviors in New York City. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1914.10.1126/science.1090847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 664–683.10.1017/S1049096500058856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Pennington, M. (2000). Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environment, 5, 153–169.10.1080/13549830050009328
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment & Behavior, 26, 239–260.10.1177/001391659402600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schahn, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment & Behavior, 22, 767–786.10.1177/0013916590226003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behavior: A five country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540–558.10.1177/0022022198294003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction? Psychology & Marketing, 11, 359–374.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.10.1177/0013916593255002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Paul (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M., Bright, A., & Ken Cordell, H. (1997). Attitudes toward wildlife species protection: Assessing moderating and mediating effects in the value‐attitude relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2, 1–20.10.1080/10871209709359091
   Google Scholar