113
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Behind and beyond the standard(ization) trap: diversifying power sources by differentiating centralization and standardization

ORCID Icon
Pages 1-19 | Received 03 Nov 2023, Accepted 24 Jan 2024, Published online: 05 Feb 2024

References

  • Alonso, J. M., Clifton, J., & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2015). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17(5), 643–660.
  • Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Rios, L. A. (2014). Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2098
  • Auriol, E., & Benaim, M. (2000). Standardization in decentralized economies. American Economic Review, 90(3), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.3.550
  • Baekkeskov, E. (2016). Same threat, different responses: Experts steering politicians and stakeholders in 2009 H1N1 vaccination policy-making. Public Administration, 94(2), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12244
  • Bakker, R. M., & Shepherd, D. A. (2017). Pull the plug or take the plunge: Multiple opportunities and the speed of venturing decisions in the Australian mining industry. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1165
  • Banks, G. C., Woznyj, H. M., Wesslen, R. S., Frear, K. A., Berka, G., Heggestad, E. D., & Gordon, H. L. (2019). Strategic recruitment across borders: An investigation of multinational enterprises. Journal of Management, 45(2), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318764295
  • Barnow, B. S., & Heinrich, C. J. (2010). One standard fits all? The pros and cons of performance standard adjustments. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02111.x
  • Blind, K. (2017). The economic functions of standards in the innovation process. In R. Hawkins, K. Blind, & R. Page (Eds.), Handbook of innovation and standards (pp. 38–62). Elga.
  • Boiral, O. (2012). ISO certificates as organizational degrees? Beyond the rational myths of the certification process. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443622
  • Brahm, F., & Tarziján, J. (2016). Toward an integrated theory of the firm: The interplay between internal organization and vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2446
  • Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612450120
  • Bunderson, J. S., van der Vegt, G. S., Cantimur, Y., & Rink, F. (2015). Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: Hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1265–1289. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0601
  • Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for reality. The MIT Press.
  • Cristofoli, D., & Markovic, J. (2016). How to make public networks really work: A qualitative comparative analysis. Public Administration, 94(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12192
  • D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1964–1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525205
  • Egyedi, T. M., & Ortt, R. (2017). Towards a functional classfication of standards for innovation research. In R. Hawkins, K. Blind, & R. Page (Eds.), Handbook of innovation and standards (pp. 105–134). Elga.
  • Esteller-Moré, A., & Polo Otero, J. (2012). Fiscal Transparency. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657839
  • Fiedler, M., & Welpe, I. (2010). How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347052
  • Fishenden, J., & Thompson, M. (2013). Digital government, open architecture, and innovation: Why public sector IT will never be the same again. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 23(4), 977–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus022
  • Fuertes, V., & Llndsay, C. (2016). Personalization and street-level practice in activation: The case of the uk’s work programme. Public Administration, 94(2), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12234
  • Fusi, F., & Feeney, M. K. (2018). Electronic monitoring in public organizations: Evidence from US local governments. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1465–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400584
  • Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 815–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443630
  • Hawkins, R., & Blind, K. (2017). Introduction: unravelling the relationship between standards and innovation. In R. Hawkins, K. Blind, & R. Page (Eds.), Handbook of Innovation and Standards (pp. 1–20). Elga.
  • Heese, J., Krishnan, R., & Moers, F. (2019). Selective regulator decoupling and organizations’ strategic responses. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2178–2204. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0446
  • Helfen, M., & Sydow, J. (2013). Negotiating as institutional work: The case of labour standards and international framework agreements. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492072
  • Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z.-X., & Han, Y. (2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management, 38(2), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342891
  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C.-H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61968124
  • Hong, B. (2020). Power to the outsiders: External hiring and decision authority allocation within organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 41(9), 1628–1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3182
  • Hou, W., Priem, R. L., & Goranova, M. (2017). Does one size fit all? Investigating pay–future performance relationships over the “seasons” of CEO tenure. Journal of Management, 43(3), 864–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544744
  • Jaskyte, K. (2010). Predictors of Administrative and Technological Innovations in Nonprofit Organizations. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 77–86.
  • Jayasinghe, M. (2016). The operational and signaling benefits of voluntary labor code adoption: Reconceptualizing the scope of human resource management in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 658–677. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0478
  • Kaufmann, W., Borry, E. L., & DeHart, D. L. (2019). More than pathological formalization: Understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12958
  • Kwon, O. (2013). Fiscal decentralization: An effective tool for government reform? Public Administration, 91(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.01982.x
  • Lam, L. W., Peng, K. Z., Wong, C.-S., & Lau, D. C. (2017). Is more feedback seeking always better? leader-member exchange moderates the relationship between feedback-seeking behavior and performance. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2195–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315581661
  • Lanaj, K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Barnes, C. M., & Harmon, S. J. (2013). The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0350
  • Lecuona, J. R., & Reitzig, M. (2014). Knowledge worth having in ‘excess’: The value of tacit and firm-specific human resource slack. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2143
  • Lin, L.-H. (2014). Organizational structure and acculturation in acquisitions: Perspectives of congruence theory and task interdependence. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1831–1856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312442385
  • Mahmood, I. P., Zhu, H., & Zaheer, A. (2017). Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1082–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2542
  • Mergel, I. (2018). Open innovation in the public sector: Drivers and barriers for the adoption of challenge.Gov. Public Management Review, 20(5), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044
  • Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2010). The degree of decentralization and individual decision-making in central government HRM – a European comparative perspective. Public Administration, 88(2), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01798.x
  • Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870100
  • Montiel, I., Husted, B. W., & Christmann, P. (2012). Using private management standard certification to reduce information asymmetries in corrupt environments. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1957
  • Nyberg, D. (2012). ‘You need to be healthy to be Ill’: Constructing sickness and framing the body in Swedish healthcare. Organization Studies, 33(12), 1671–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612457615
  • O’Toole, M., & Grey, C. (2016). ‘We can tell them to get lost, but we won’t do that’: Cultural control and resistance in voluntary work. Organization Studies, 37(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615604507
  • Olsen, A. L. (2017). Compared to what? How social and historical reference points affect citizens’ performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 27(4), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux023
  • Overman, S. (2016). Great expectations of public service delegation: A systematic review. Public Management Review, 18(8), 1238–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1103891
  • Paradeise, C., & Thoenig, J.-C. (2010). Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards. Organization Studies, 34(2), 189–218.
  • Peng, S., Pandey, S., & Pandey, S. K. (2015). Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual-organizational value congruence. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12357
  • Ranganathan, R., & Rosenkopf, L. (2014). Do ties really bind? The effect of knowledge and commercialization networks on opposition to standards. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1064
  • Raudla, R., Douglas, J. W., Randma, L. T., & Savi, R. (2015). The impact of fiscal crisis on decision-making processes in European governments: Dynamics of a centralization cascade. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 842–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12381
  • Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2015). After Rana Plaza: Building coalition power for labour rights between unions and (consumption-based) social movement organisations. Organization, 22(5), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415585028
  • Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 791–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443629
  • Schakel, A. H. (2010). Explaining regional and local government: An empirical test of the decentralization theorem. Governance, 23(2), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01482.x
  • Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2016). Rival regulatory regimes in international environmental politics: The case of biosafety. Public Administration, 94(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12176
  • Siciliano, M. D., Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Liou, Y. (2017). A cognitive perspective on policy implementation: Reform beliefs, sensemaking, and social networks. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12797
  • Suárez, D. F. (2011). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 21(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/muq049
  • Van den Ende, J., van de Kaa, G., den Uijl, S., & de Vries, H. J. (2012). The paradox of standard flexibility: The effects of Co-evolution between standard and interorganizational network. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 705–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443625
  • Van den Hurk, M., & Verhoest, K. (2016). The challenge of using standard contracts in public–private partnerships. Public Management Review, 18(2), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.984623
  • Verbeeten, F. H. M., & Speklé, R. F. (2015). Management control, results-oriented culture and public sector performance: Empirical evidence on new public management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014
  • Wang, W. (2016). Exploring the determinants of network effectiveness: The case of neighborhood governance networks in Beijing. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 26(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv017
  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. Original work published 1922
  • Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0762
  • York, J. G., Vedula, S., & Lenox, M. J. (2018). It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1492–1523. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0769
  • Younkin, P. (2016). Complicating abandonment: How a multi-stage theory of abandonment clarifies the evolution of an adopted practice. Organization Studies, 37(7), 1017–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615613376

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.