참고문헌

• 8 (2) (2007), pp. 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• (1999), pp. 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• 47 (2000), pp. 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• 15 (5) (2004), pp. 503–521.
   Google Scholar
• 19 (2) (2004), pp. 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. , and Churchill, G. A. , 1977. “The Impacts of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations,” , Journal of Marketing Research (1977), pp. 538–555, 14(November).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, T. C. , 1968. "Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change". In: Greenwald, A. G. , Brock, T. C. , and Ostrom, T. M. , eds. Psychology foundations of Attitudes . New York: Academic Press; 1968. pp. 243–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bozzolo, A. M. , and Brock, T. C. , 1992. “Unavailability Effects on Message Processing: A Theoretical Analysis and an Empirical Test,” , Basic and Applied Social Psychology (1992), pp. 93–101, 13(March).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S. , and Brehm, J. W. , 1981. Psychological Resistance: A Theory of Freedom and Control . New York: Academic Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C. , 1999. “Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences,” , Journal of Marketing Research 36 (1999), pp. 187–199, (May).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C. , and Kirmani, A. , 2000. “Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,” , Journal of Consumer Research (2000), pp. 69–83, 27(June).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C. , and Keller, K. L. , 2003. “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects,” , Journal of Consumer Research (2003), pp. 292–304, 30 (September).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. , 1985. Influence: Science and Practice . Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. , 1993. Influence: Science and Practice . New York: Harper Collins; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. , Chaiken, S. , and Wood, W. , 1981. "“An Attribution Analysis of Persuasion,”". In: Harvey, J. H. , Ickes, W. J. , Kidd, R. F. , and Hillsdale, , eds. New Directions in Attribution Research . Vol. 3. NJ: Erlbaum; 1981. pp. 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M. , and Wright, P. , 1994. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” , Journal of Consumer Research (1994), pp. 1–31, 21 (June).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M. , and Wright, P. , 1995. “Persuasion Knowledge: Lay People's and Researchers' Beliefs about the Psychology of Advertising,” , Journal of Consumer Research (1995), pp. 62–74, 22 (June).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, H. L. , 1971. “A Commodity Theory Analysis of Consumer Preference for Scarce Products,” , In Proceedings of the 79th Annual Convention of the America Psychological Association 6 (1971), pp. 521–654.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T. , and Malone, P. S. , 1995. “The Correspondence Bias,” , Psychological Bulletin 117 (1) (1995), pp. 21–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T. , Malone, P. S. , Pelham, Brett W. , and Krull, D. S. , 1988. “On Cognitive Busyness: When Person Perceivers Meet Persons Perceived,” , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988), pp. 733–740, (May).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, J. J. , Peter, A. C. , and Raghubir, P. , 1997. “Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value” , Journal of Consumer Research (1997), pp. 68–79, 24 (June).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. M. , and Kellaris, J. J. , 2004. “Cross-national Differences in Proneness to Scarcity Effects: Familiarity, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Need for Cognitive Closure,” , Psychology & Marketing 21 (9) (2004), pp. 739–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. , Knetsch, J. , and Thaler, R. , 1986. “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market,” , The American Economic Review 76 (1986), pp. 728–741, (September).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. , 1991. “Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature,” , Psychology & Marketing (1991), pp. 43–57, 18(Spring).
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. , 1992. “Scarcity Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naive Economic Theories,” , Basic and Applied Social Psychology (1992), pp. 67–78, 13(March).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D. , and Chaiken, S. , 1991. “Promoting Systematic Processing in Low Motivation Setting: Effects of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgement,” , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (1991), pp. 13–25, (July).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. , 1978. Psychometric Theory, . New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. W. , Mothersbaugh, D. L. , and Feick, L. , 1994. “Consumer Knowledge Assesment,” , Journal of Consumer Research (1994), pp. 71–82, 21 (June).
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. , and Hovland, C. E. , 1964. Social Judgement . CT: Yale University Press; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R. , 1992. “Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel?,” , Basic and Applied Social Psychology 13 (1992), pp. 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. , 1992. Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories and Research . CA: Sage Publications; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S. , 1992. “Beyond a Commodity Theory Analysis of Censorship: When Abundance and Personalism Enhance Scarcity Effects,” , Basic and Applied Social Psychology 13 (1992), pp. 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar