Draft Genome Assembly and Annotation for Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis NICC30027, an Oleaginous Yeast Capable of Simultaneous Glucose and Xylose Assimilation

References

• Roy S, Dikshit PK, Sherpa KC, et al. Recent nanobiotechnological advancements in lignocellulosic biomass valorization: a review. J Environ Manage. 2021;297:113422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Singh B, Korstad J, et al. Utilization of lignocellulosic biomass by oleaginous yeast and bacteria for production of biodiesel and renewable diesel. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2017;73:654–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhlisah ZN, Yunus R, Abidin ZZ, et al. Pretreatment methods for an effective conversion of oil palm biomass into sugars and high-value chemicals. Biomass Bioenergy. 2021;144:105901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K, et al. Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: overview and limits. J Biotechnol. 2011;156(4):286–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang AT, Nižetić S, Ong HC, et al. Insight into the recent advances of microwave pretreatment technologies for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into sustainable biofuel. Chemosphere. 2021;281:130878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S, Patel A, et al. Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: an assessment of technology, its importance, and strategic applications in circular bio-economy. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2020;127:109876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia SK, Kim S-H, Yoon J-J, et al. Current status and strategies for second generation biofuel production using microbial systems. Energy Convers Manage. 2017;148:1142–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanimura A, Takashima M, Sugita T, et al. Lipid production through simultaneous utilization of glucose, xylose, and L-arabinose by Pseudozyma hubeiensis: a comparative screening study. AMB Express. 2016;6(1):58.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg J, Blomqvist J, Pickova J, et al. Lipid production from hemicellulose with Lipomyces starkeyi in a pH regulated fed-batch cultivation. Yeast. 2016;33(8):451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanadul O-U-M, Noochanong W, Jirakranwong P, et al. EMS-induced mutation followed by quizalofop-screening increased lipid productivity in chlorella sp. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2018;41(5):613–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar P, Goswami G, Mukherjee M, et al. Heterologous expression of xylose specific transporter improves xylose utilization by recombinant Zymomonas mobilis strain in presence of glucose. Process Biochem. 2021;102:190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Yu Y, Wang K, et al. Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica to produce fuels and chemicals from xylose: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2021;337:125484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu C, Wu S, Wang Q, et al. Simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose for lipid production by Trichosporon cutaneum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4(1):25.,
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanimura A, Sugita T, Endoh R, et al. Lipid production via simultaneous conversion of glucose and xylose by a novel yeast, Cystobasidium iriomotense. PLOS One. 2018;13(9):e0202164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang D, Zhang Z, et al. Comparative glucose and xylose coutilization efficiencies of soil-isolated yeast strains identify Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis as a potential producer of lipid. ACS Omega. 2020;5(37):23596–23603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadanho M, Sampaio JP. Occurrence and diversity of yeasts in the mid-atlantic ridge hydrothermal fields near the Azores Archipelago. Microb Ecol. 2005;50(3):408–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X-Z, Wang Q-M, Göker M, et al. Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the tremellomycetes. Stud Mycol. 2015;81:85–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Espírito Santo EPT, Monteiro RC, da Costa ARF, et al. Molecular identification, genotyping, phenotyping, and antifungal susceptibilities of medically important Trichosporon, Apiotrichum, and Cutaneotrichosporon species. Mycopathologia. 2019;185:307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagani DM, Heidrich D, Paulino GVB, et al. Susceptibility to antifungal agents and enzymatic activity of Candida haemulonii and Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis isolated from soft corals on the Brazilian reefs. Arch Microbiol. 2016;198(10):963–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu J, Ning P, Guo T, et al. First report of leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola and C. siamense on Zizyphus mauritiana in Guangxi, China. Plant Dis. 2020;104(12):3256–3256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai AL, Zhao Q, Li XJ, et al. First report of cercospora leaf spot caused by Cercospora cf. flagellaris on okra in China. Plant Dis. 2021;105(7):2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnecka AK, Nawrat D, Piwowar M, et al. DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures. Contemp Oncol. 2019;23(1):52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Das P, Pandey P, Harishankar A, et al. A high yield DNA extraction method for medically important candida species: a comparison of manual versus QIAcube-based automated system. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2016;34(4):533–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malentacchi F, Ciniselli CM, Pazzagli M, et al. Influence of pre-analytical procedures on genomic DNA integrity in blood samples: the SPIDIA experience. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;440:205–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasiri H, Forouzandeh M, Rasaee MJ, et al. Modified salting-out method: high-yield, high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole blood using laundry detergent. J Clin Lab Anal. 2005;19(6):229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang J, Zhu R, Sun X, et al. Evaluation of the MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform for Illumina target capture sequencing libraries. Front Genet. 2021;12:730519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong N, Ng W, Thao K, et al. Automation of PacBio SMRTbell NGS library preparation for bacterial genome sequencing. Stand Genomic Sci. 2017;12:27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L-L, Huang W, Zhang Y-Y, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic study for screening genes involved in the limonene biotransformation of Penicillium digitatum DSM 62840. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickhart DM, McClure JC, Schnabel RD, et al. Symposium review: advances in sequencing technology herald a new frontier in cattle genomics and genome-enabled selection. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(6):5278–5290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Li Y, Li S, et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:251364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshinaga Y, Daum C, He G, et al. Genome sequencing. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1775:37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Takashima M, Sriswasdi S, Manabe R-I, et al. A trichosporonales genome tree based on 27 haploid and three evolutionarily conserved 'natural' hybrid genomes. Yeast. 2018;35(1):99–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close D, Ojumu J. Draft genome sequence of the oleaginous yeast Cryptococcus curvatus ATCC 20509. Genome Announc. 2016;4(6):e01235–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sun S, Coelho MA, Heitman J, et al. Convergent evolution of linked mating-type loci in basidiomycete fungi. PLOS Genet. 2019;15(9):e1008365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyer T, Hackenschmidt S, Nadler F, et al. Draft genome sequence of Cutaneotrichosporon curvatus DSM 101032 (formerly Cryptococcus curvatus), an oleaginous yeast producing polyunsaturated fatty acids. Genome Announc. 2016;4(3):e00362–16.
   Google Scholar
• Alva A, Sabido-Ramos A, Escalante A, et al. New insights into transport capability of sugars and its impact on growth from novel mutants of Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(4):1463–1479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma NK, Behera S, Arora R, et al. Xylose transport in yeast for lignocellulosic ethanol production: current status. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;125(3):259–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasylyshyn R, Kurylenko O, Ruchala J, et al. Engineering of sugar transporters for improvement of xylose utilization during high-temperature alcoholic fermentation in Ogataea polymorpha yeast. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Zhang J, Wang D, et al. Simultaneous fermentation of glucose and xylose at elevated temperatures co-produces ethanol and xylitol through overexpression of a xylose-specific transporter in engineered Kluyveromyces marxianus. Bioresour Technol. 2016;216:227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runquist D, Fonseca C, Rådström P, et al. Expression of the Gxf1 transporter from Candida intermedia improves fermentation performance in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82(1):123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young E, Poucher A, Comer A, et al. Functional survey for heterologous sugar transport proteins, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a host. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(10):3311–3319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Goh E-B, Beller HR, et al. Engineering E. coli for simultaneous glucose-xylose utilization during methyl ketone production. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hua Y, Wang J, Zhu Y, et al. Release of glucose repression on xylose utilization in Kluyveromyces marxianus to enhance glucose-xylose co-utilization and xylitol production from corncob hydrolysate. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):24.
   Google Scholar
• Abe K, Uchida K. Correlation between depression of catabolite control of xylose metabolism and a defect in the phosphoenolpyruvate: mannose phosphotransferase system in Pediococcus halophilus. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(4):1793–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khunnonkwao P, Jantama SS, Kanchanatawee S, et al. Re-engineering Escherichia coli KJ122 to enhance the utilization of xylose and xylose/glucose mixture for efficient succinate production in mineral salt medium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(1):127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranade S, Zhang Y, Kaplan M, et al. Metabolic engineering and comparative performance studies of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 strains for effective utilization of xylose. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zhang Z, Hoshino A, et al. NADPH production by the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway supports folate metabolism. Nat Metab. 2019;1:404–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minard KI, McAlister-Henn L. Sources of NADPH in yeast vary with carbon source. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(48):39890–39896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JW, Da Silva NA. Improving polyketide and fatty acid synthesis by engineering of the yeast acetyl-CoA carboxylase. J Biotechnol. 2014;187:56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya AM, Luna-Rodríguez CE, Bonifaz A, et al. Physiological characterization and molecular identification of some rare yeast species causing onychomycosis. J Mycol Med. 2021;31(2):101121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher MD, Chen-Plotkin AS. The Post-GWAS era: from association to function. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102(5):717–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MN, Arkin AP. Curated BLAST for genomes. mSystems. 2019;4(2):e00072-19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace J, Youens-Clark K, Freeman C, et al. PuMA: a papillomavirus genome annotation tool. Virus Evol. 2020;6(2):veaa068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrini V, Gao X, Rosa BA, et al. Improving eukaryotic genome annotation using single molecule mRNA sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):172.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JD, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM, et al. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;15(3):275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skov LK, Mirza O, Henriksen A, et al. Amylosucrase, a glucan-synthesizing enzyme from the alpha-amylase family. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(27):25273–25278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietmann S,PJ, Notredame C, Heger A, et al. A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: dali domain dictionary version 3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(1):55–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krissinel E, Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(12):2256–2268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison A, Pearl F, Sillitoe I, et al. Recognizing the fold of a protein structure. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(14):1748–1759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkowski TA, Freeman P, Liang J, et al. pvSOAR: detecting similar surface patterns of pocket and void surfaces of amino acid residues on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W555–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ra L. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J Mol Graph. 1995;13(5):323–330.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser F, Morris RJ, Najmanovich RJ, et al. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures. Proteins. 2006;62(2):479–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innis CA, Anand AP, Sowdhamini R, et al. Prediction of functional sites in proteins using conserved functional group analysis. J Mol Biol. 2004;337(4):1053–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins A, Erdin S, Lua R, et al. Evolutionary trace for prediction and redesign of protein functional sites. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;819:29–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pillai-Kastoori L, Schutz-Geschwender AR, Harford JA, et al. A systematic approach to quantitative western blot analysis. Anal Biochem. 2020;593:113608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atout S, Shurrab S, Loveridge C, et al. Evaluation of the suitability of RNAscope as a technique to measure gene expression in clinical diagnostics: a systematic review. Mol Diagn Ther. 2022;26(1):19–37.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam B, Basit M, Nisar MA, et al. Proteomics: technologies and their applications. J Chromatogr Sci. 2017;55(2):182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappireddi N, Martin L, Wühr M, et al. A review on quantitative multiplexed proteomics. Chembiochem. 2019;20(10):1210–1224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar