496
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perceived input control on online platforms from the application developer perspective: conceptualisation and scale development

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 19-40 | Received 13 Mar 2019, Accepted 29 Apr 2019, Published online: 15 May 2019

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.
  • Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor-analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 732–740.
  • Barki, H., Titah, R., & Boffo, C. (2007). Information system use–related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Information Systems Research, 18(2), 173–192.
  • Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). The signaling role of IT features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 7–56.
  • Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., & Hess, T. (2015). How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 209–228.
  • Benlian, A., Koufaris, M., & Hess, T. (2011). Service quality in software-as-a-service: Developing the SaaS-Qual measure and examining its role in usage continuance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 85–126.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
  • Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
  • Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Howcroft, D. (2011). Mobile applications development on apple and google platforms. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 565–580.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
  • Boell, S.K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173.
  • Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Introduction: expert interviews — an introduction to a new methodological debate (pp. 1–13). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Boudreau, K.J. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. Devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872.
  • Boudreau, K.J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427.
  • Boudreau, K.J., & Lakhani, K.R. (2009). How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69–76.
  • Boudreau, M.C., Gefen, D., & Straub, D.W. (2001). Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 1–16.
  • Brocke, J.V., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., & Platfaut, R. (2015). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 205–224.
  • Cardinal, L.B., Kreutzer, M., & Miller, C.C. (2017). An aspirational view of organizational control research: Re-invigorating empirical work to better meet the challenges of 21st century organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 559–592.
  • Cardinal, L.B., Sitkin, S.B., & Long, C.P. (2004). Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15(4), 411–431.
  • Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D.J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.
  • Cenfetelli, R.T., Benbasat, I., & Al-Natour, S. (2008). Addressing the what and how of online services: Positioning supporting-services functionality and service quality for business-to-consumer success. Information Systems Research, 19(2), 161–181.
  • Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314.
  • Christopher Westland, J. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476–487.
  • Chua, C.E.H., Lim, W.-K., Soh, C., & Sia, S.K. (2012). Enacting clan control in complex It Projects: A Social capital perspective. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 577–600.
  • Churchill, G.A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
  • Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G.G. (2018). Introduction — platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 381–400.
  • de Reuver, M., & Bouwman, H. (2012). Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 347–354.
  • de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R.C. (2017). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135.
  • DeVellis, R.F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015). distributed tuning of boundary resources: The Case of Apple’s iOS Service System. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217–243.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
  • Fleischmann, M., Amirpur, M., Grupp, T., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2016). The role of software updates in information systems continuance — An experimental study from a user perspective. Decision Support Systems, 83, 83–96.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.
  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E.E., & Straub, D. (2011). Editor’s comments: An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), doi:10.2307/23044042
  • Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192.
  • Goldbach, T., Benlian, A., & Buxmann, P. (2018). Differential effects of formal and self-control in mobile platform ecosystems: Multi-method findings on third-party developers’ continuance intentions and application quality. Information & Management, 55(3), 271–284.
  • Gregory, R.W., Beck, R., & Keil, M. (2013). Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1211–1232.
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Henderson, J.C., & Lee, S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38(6), 757–777.
  • Hilkert, D., Benlian, A., Sarstedt, M., & Hess, T. (2011). Perceived software platform openness: The scale and its impact on developer satisfaction. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Shanghai, China.
  • Hinkin, T.R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988.
  • Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.
  • Hoffmann, E.A. (2007). Open-ended interviews, power, and emotional labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(3), 318–346.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
  • Jaworski, B.J. (1988). Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 23–39.
  • Kirsch, L.J. (1997). Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 215–239.
  • Kirsch, L.J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M.H. (2010). Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organization Science, 21(2), 469–489.
  • Koh, T.K., & Fichman, M. (2014). Multihoming users’ preferences for two-sided exchange networks. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 977–996.
  • Krausert, A. (2009). Performance management for different employee groups. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.
  • Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
  • MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2011). construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.
  • Mähring, M. (2002). IT Project Governance (Doctoral Dissertation). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm School of Economics.
  • Mähring, M., Wiener, M., & Remus, U. (2018). Getting the control across: Control transmission in information systems offshoring projects. Information Systems Journal, 28(4), 708–728.
  • Manikas, K. (2016). Revisiting software ecosystems Research: A longitudinal literature study. Journal of Systems and Software, 117(C), 84–103.
  • McKenzie, J.F., Wood, M.L., Kotecki, J.E., Clark, J.K., & Brey, R.A. (1999). Establishing content validity: Using qualitative and quantitative steps. American Journal of Health Behavior, 23(4), 311–318.
  • Moore, G.C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.
  • Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 1–51.
  • Ouchi, W.G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.
  • Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.
  • Polites, G.L., Roberts, N., & Thatcher, J. (2012). Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 22–48.
  • Rossiter, J.R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305–335.
  • Sah, R.K., & Stiglitz, J.E. (1986). The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 716–727.
  • Schlagwein, D., Conboy, K., Feller, J., Leimeister, J.M., & Morgan, L. (2017). “Openness” with and without information technology: A framework and a brief history. Journal of Information Technology, 32(4), 297–305.
  • Segars, A.H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 25(1), 107–121.
  • Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W.R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943.
  • Snell, S.A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292–327.
  • Thies, F., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2016). Effects of social interaction dynamics on platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(3), 843–873.
  • Thies, F., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2018). Network effects on crowdfunding platforms: Exploring the implications of relaxing input control. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1239–1262.
  • Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform Ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
  • Tiwana, A. (2015a). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266–281.
  • Tiwana, A. (2015b). Platform desertion by app developers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 40–77.
  • Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A.A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.
  • Vlasic, A., & Yetton, P. (2004). Effective project control: Insights from the Australian construction industry. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Shanghai, China.
  • Wareham, J., Fox, P.B., & Giner, J.L.C. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215.
  • Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.
  • Wessel, M., Thies, F., & Benlian, A. (2017). Opening the floodgates: The implications of increasing platform openness in crowdfunding. Journal of Information Technology, 32(4), 344–360.
  • Wiener, M., Cram, A., & Remus, U. (2017, June). The view from the top - how senior executives exercise control over information systems projects to enhance performance. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal.5-10
  • Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., & Saunders, C. (2016). control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 741–774.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.