Adapting process models via an automated planning approach

References

• Afflerbach, P., Kastner, G., Krause, F., & Röglinger, M. (2014). The Business Value of Process Flexibility. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0333-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alférez, G.H., Pelechano, V., Mazo, R., Salinesi, C., & Diaz, D. (2014). Dynamic adaptation of service compositions with variability models. Journal of Systems and Software, 91, 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F.M., Marrella, A., Mecella, M., & Soo, A. (2018). Automated discovery of process models from event logs: Review and benchmark. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 31(4), 686-705. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2841877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba, I., Del Valle, C., Weber, B., & Jiménez-Ramírez, A. (2013a). Automatic generation of optimized business process models from constraint-based specifications. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 22(2), 1350009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218843013500093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba, I., Weber, B., Del Valle, C., & Jiménez-Ramírez, A. (2013b). User recommendations for the optimized execution of business processes. Data & knowledge engineering, 86, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashari, M., Bagheri, E., & Du, W. (2018). Automated composition and optimization of services for variability-intensive domains. Journal of Systems and Software, 146, 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli, P., Cimatti, A., Roveri, M., & Traverso, P. (2006). Strong planning under partial observability. Artificial intelligence, 170(4–5), 337–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Zliobaite, I., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2014). Dealing with concept drifts in process mining. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 25(1), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2278313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchiarone, A., Dragoni, N., & Dustdar, S. (2020). Microservices. In A. Bucchiarone, N. Dragoni, S. Dustdar, P. Lago, M. Mazzara, V. Rivera, & A. Sadovykh (Eds.), Science and Engineering. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchiarone, A., Pistore, M., Raik, H., & Kazhamiakin, R. 2011. Adaptation of service-based business processes by context-aware replanning. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA) (pp. 1–8). Irvine, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chafle, G., Dasgupta, K., Kumar, A., Mittal, S., & Srivastava, B. 2006. Adaptation in Web Service Composition and Execution. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’06) (pp. 549–557). Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cognini, R., Corradini, F., Gnesi, S., Polini, A., & Re, B. (2016). Business process flexibility - a systematic literature review with a software systems perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 343-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9678-2
   Google Scholar
• de Masellis, R., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Montali, M., & Tessaris, S. 2017. Add data into business process verification: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbarth, T., Lautenbacher, F., & Bauer, B. (2011). Adaptation of Process Models – A Semantic-based Approach. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 43(1), 5–23. Retrieved from https://50years.acs.org.au/content/dam/acs/50-years/journals/jrpit/JRPIT43.1.5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ertugrul, A.M., & Demirors, O. 2016. A Method for Modeling Business Processes in a Role-based and Decentralized Way. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management - S-BPM ‘16 (pp. 1–4). Erlangen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Fahland, D., Favre, C., Koehler, J., Lohmann, N., Völzer, H., & Wolf, K. (2011). Analysis on demand. Instantaneous soundness checking of industrial business process models. Data & knowledge engineering, 70(5), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2012). Repairing Process Models to Reflect Reality. Business Process Management, 7481, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_19
   Google Scholar
• Fan, S.-L., Yang, Y.-B., & Wang, X.-X. 2018. Efficient Web Service Composition via Knapsack-Variant Algorithm. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Services Computing (pp. 51–66). San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Process on Demand: Planning and Control of Adaptive Business Processes. In G. Brunetti, T. Feld, L. Heuser, J. Schnitter, & C. Webel (Eds.), Future Business Software (pp. 55–66). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Forstner, E., Kamprath, N., & Röglinger, M. (2014). Capability development with process maturity models – Decision framework and economic analysis. Journal of Decision Systems (JDS), 23(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2014.865310
   Google Scholar
• Gambini, M., La Rosa, M., Migliorini, S., & Ter Hofstede, A.H.M. (2011). Automated error correction of business process models. In S. Rinderle-Ma, F. Toumani, & K. Wolf (Eds.), Business Process Management (pp. 148–165). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Bañuelos, L., van Beest, N.R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., & Mertens, W. (2017). Complete and interpretable conformance checking of business processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 44(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2017.2668418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerevini, A.E., & Serina, I. 2000. Fast Plan Adaptation through Planning Graphs: Local and Systematic Search Techniques. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (pp. 112–121). Breckenridge, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ghallab, M., Nau, D.S., & Traverso, P. (2004). Automated Planning: Theory & Practice. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ghallab, M., Nau, D.S., & Traverso, P. (2016). Automated Planning and Acting. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., Klier, M., & Zimmermann, S. (2015). Automated planning of process models: Design of a novel approach to construct exclusive choices. Decision support systems, 78, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., Krause, F., & Schiller, A. (2019). Automated planning of process models: The construction of parallel splits and synchronizations. Decision support systems, 125, 1113096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., & Lewerenz, L. (2015). Decision support for the usage of mobile information services: A context-aware service selection approach that considers the effects of context interdependencies. Journal of Decision Systems (JDS) , 24(4), 406–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2015.1080498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., Schiller, A., & Schön, D. (2018). The cooperation of multiple actors within process models: An automated planning approach. Journal of Decision Systems (JDS), 27(4), 238–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2019.1600894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., & Schön, D. 2015. Automated Planning of context-aware Process Models. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Münster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., & Schön, D. 2016. Automated Planning of Process Models: The Construction of Simple Merges. In Proceedings of the 24rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Henneberger, M., Heinrich, B., Lautenbacher, F., & Bauer, B. (2008). Semantic-Based Planning of Process Models. In Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) (pp. 1677–1689). Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J., Weber, I., & Kraft, F.M. (2012). SAP Speaks PDDL: Exploiting a Software-Engineering Model for Planning in Business Process Management. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 44(1), 587–632. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3636
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, T., Koschmider, A., & Oberweis, A. 2007. A Rule-based Autocompletion Of Business Process Models. In CAiSE Forum 2007. Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE). Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hulpuş, I., Fradinho, M., & Hayes, C. (2010). On-the-Fly Adaptive Planning for Game-Based Learning. In D. Hutchison, T. Kanade, J. Kittler, J. M. Kleinberg, F. Mattern, J. C. Mitchell, M. Naor, O. Nierstrasz, C. P. Rangan, B. Steffen, M. Sudan, D. Terzopoulos, D. Tygar, M. Y. Vardi, G. Weikum, I. Bichindaritz, & S. Montani (Eds.), Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development (pp. 375–389). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. (2010). An adaptive framework for aligning (re)planning decisions on supply chain strategy, design, tactics, and operations. International Journal of Production Research, 48(13), 3999–4017. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540902893417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannsen, F., & Fill, H.-G. (2017). Meta Modeling for Business Process Improvement. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(4), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0477-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenkova, A.A., van der Aalst, W.M., Lomazova, I.A., & Rubin, V.A. (2017). Process mining using BPMN: Relating event logs and process models. Software & Systems Modeling, 16(4), 1019–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-015-0502-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambhampati, S. (1997). Refinement Planning as a Unifying Framework for Plan Synthesis. AI MAGAZINE, 18(2), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v18i2.1295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzmarzik, A., Henneberger, M., & Buhl, H.U. (2012). Interdependencies between automation and sourcing of business processes. Journal of Decision Systems (JDS), 21(4), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2012.749755
   Google Scholar
• Kindler, E., Rubin, V., & Schäfer, W. (2006). Process Mining and Petri Net Synthesis. In J. Eder & S. Dustdar (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 105–116). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, F.-L., Kind, C., & Voigtsberger, J. (2004). Adaptive Modelling and Simulation of Product Development Processes. CIRP Annals, 53(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60662-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W.M., Dumas, M., & Milani, F.P. (2017). Business process variability modeling: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(1), 2. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3041957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautenbacher, F., Eisenbarth, T., & Bauer, B. 2009. Process model adaptation using semantic technologies. In 13th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (pp. 301–309). Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Le Clair, C. 2013. Make Business Agility A Key Corporate Attribute – It Could Be What Saves You. http://blogs.forrester.com/craig_le_clair/13-09-09-make_business_agility_a_key_corporate_attribute_it_could_be_what_saves_you
   Google Scholar
• Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W.M. (2018). Scalable process discovery and conformance checking. Software & Systems Modeling, 17(2), 599–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0545-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leffingwell, D. (2018). SAFe reference guide. Scaled Agile Framework for lean software and systems engineering: SAFe 4.5. Scaled Agile Inc; Pearson Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Leoni, M.D., & Marrella, A. (2017). Aligning Real Process Executions and Prescriptive Process Models through Automated Planning. Expert systems with applications, 82, 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S.-Y., Lin, G.-T., Chao, K.-M., & Lo, -C.-C. (2012). A Cost-Effective Planning Graph Approach for Large-Scale Web Service Composition. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/783476
   Google Scholar
• Linden, I., Derbali, M., Schwanen, G., Jacquet, J.-M., Ramdoyal, R., & Ponsard, C. (2014). Supporting Business Process Exception Management by Dynamically Building Processes Using the BEM Framework. In F. Dargam, J. E. Hernández, P. Zaraté, S. Liu, R. Ribeiro, B. Delibašić, & J. Papathanasiou (Eds.), Decision Support Systems III - Impact of Decision Support Systems for Global Environments (pp. 67–78). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M., & Toussaint, P.J. (2018). Guided Process Discovery‐A pattern-based approach. Information systems, 76, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2018.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrella, A. (2019). Automated Planning for Business Process Management. Journal on data semantics, 8, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-018-0096-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrella, A., Mecella, M., & Sardina, S. (2017). Intelligent Process Adaptation in the SmartPM System. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 8(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrella, A., Russo, A., & Mecella, M. (2012). Planlets: Automatically Recovering Dynamic Processes in YAWL. In Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems” (pp. 268–286). Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (1983). Managing the data-base environment. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McElheran, K. (2015). Do Market Leaders Lead in Business Process Innovation? The Case(s) of E-business Adoption. Management science, 61(6), 1197–1216. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megargel, A., Shankararaman, V., & Walker, D.K. (2020). Migrating from Monoliths to Cloud-Based Microservices: A Banking Industry Example. In M. Ramachandran (Ed.), Software Engineering in the Era of Cloud Computing (pp. 85–108). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mejri, A., Ayachi-Ghannouchi, S., & Martinho, R. (2018). A quantitative approach for measuring the degree of flexibility of business process models. Business Process Managment Journal, 24(4), 1023-1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2017-0058
   Google Scholar
• Mendling, J., Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., & Neumann, G. (2008). Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model. Data & knowledge engineering, 64(1), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2007.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, H., & Weske, M. (2006). Automated service composition using heuristic search. Business Process Management, LNCS 4102, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/11841760_7
   Google Scholar
• Milani, F., Dumas, M., Matulevičius, R., Ahmed, N., & Kasela, S. (2016). Criteria and Heuristics for Business Process Model Decomposition. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0413-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milionis, N., Jereb, S., Henderson, K., Vrabic, J., Bain, M., Dolezal, J., Roessing, E., Santos, D., Coelho, J.N., Simeonova, R., & Otto, J. 2019. The EU’s response to the “dieselgate” scandal. Retrieved September 22, 2019, from https://www.eca.europa.eu/lists/ecadocuments/brp_vehicle_emissions/brp_vehicle_emissions_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nebel, B., & Koehler, J. (1995). Plan reuse versus plan generation. A theoretical and empirical analysis. Artificial intelligence, 76(1–2), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00082-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noura, M., & Gaedke, M. 2019. An Automated Cyclic Planning Framework Based on Plan-Do-Check-Act for Web of Things Composition. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science - WebSci ‘19 (pp. 205–214). Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, V.T., Santoro, F.M., Werner, C.M.L., & Ralha, C.G. (2018). Real-Time Process Adaptation. A Context-Aware Replanning Approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2591538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S.A. (2016). The power of business process improvement. 10 simple steps to increase effectiveness, efficiency, and adaptability. American Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parnas, D.L. (1972). On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communcation ACM, 15(12), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1145/361598.361623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesic, M., & van der Aalst, W.M. 2006. A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 169–180). Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Akoka, J. (2015). A Taxonomy of Evaluation Methods for Information Systems Artifacts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), 229–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1099390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regev, G., Bider, I., & Wegmann, A. (2007). Defining business process flexibility with the help of invariants. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 12(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.301
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, M., & Dadam, P. 1997. A framework for dynamic changes in workflow management systems. In Eighth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (pp. 42–48). Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, M., & Dadam, P. (1998). Adeptflex‐-Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control. Journal of intelligent information systems, 10(2), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008604709862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, M.U., & Weber, B. (2012). Enabling flexibility in process-aware information systems: Challenges, methods, technologies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reisert, C., Zelt, S., & Wacker, J. (2018). How to move from paper to impact in business process management: The journey of sap. In J. vom Brocke & J. Mendling (Eds.), Business Process Management Cases (pp. 21–36). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, K., Holler, J., & Indulska, M. 2011. Collaborative process modelling-Tool analysis and design implications. In 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011. Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., & Dadam, P. (2004). Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems––a survey. Data & knowledge engineering, 50(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, C., Schwaiger, J.-M., & Johannsen, F. (2015). A Prototype for Supporting Novices in Collaborative Business Process Modeling Using a Tablet Device. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (pp. 371–375). Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemann, M., & Vom Brocke, J. (2015). The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management. In J. Vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1. Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems (pp. 107–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemann, M., Recker, J.C., & Flender, C. (2010). Designing context-aware business processes. In K. Siau, R. H. L. Chiang, & B. C. Hardgrave (Eds.), Systems Analysis and Design: People, Processes, and Projects (pp. 53–74). ME Sharpe, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., Sajeev, A.S.M., Bihary, S., & Ranjan, A. (2014). An Empirical Study of Error Patterns in Industrial Business Process Models. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., 7(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2013.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scala, E., Micalizio, R., & Torasso, P. (2015). Robust plan execution via reconfiguration and replanning. AIC, 28(3), 479–509. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-140629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 2019. The Influence of Automated Planning on the Task Performance of Process Modelers. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2019. Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Seeliger, A., Nolle, T., & Mühlhäuser, M. 2017. Detecting Concept Drift in Processes using Graph Metrics on Process Graphs. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management - S-BPM ONE ‘17 (pp. 1–10). Darmstadt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Seethamraju, R., & Marjanovic, O. (2009). Role of process knowledge in business process improvement methodology. A case study. Business Process Managment Journal, 15(6), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003784
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2003). Business process management. The third wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tax, N., Verenich, I., La Rosa, M., & Dumas, M. 2017. Predictive business process monitoring with LSTM neural networks. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2017) (pp. 477–492). Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Turetken, O., Dikici, A., Vanderfeesten, I., Rompen, T., & Demirors, O. (2020). The Influence of Using Collapsed Sub-processes and Groups on the Understandability of Business Process Models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00577-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beest, N.R.T.P., Kaldeli, E., Bulanov, P., Wortmann, J.C., & Lazovik, A. (2014). Automated runtime repair of business processes. Information systems, 39, 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2013). Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 2013(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2015). Extracting Event Data from Databases to Unleash Process Mining. In J. Vom Brocke & T. Schmiedel (Eds.), BPM - Driving Innovation in a Digital World (pp. 105–128). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W.M.P., & Jablonski, S. (2000). Dealing with workflow change: Identification of issues and solutions. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 15(5), 267–276. Retrieved from http://www.padsweb.rwth-aachen.de/wvdaalst/publications/p112.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., & Schonenberg, H. (2009). Declarative workflows: Balancing between flexibility and support. Computer Science - Research and Development, 23(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-009-0057-9
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W.M.P., Rubin, V., Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., Kindler, E., & Günther, C.W. (2010). Process mining: A two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting. Software & Systems Modeling, 9(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-008-0106-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., & Barros, A.P. (2003). Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022883727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gorp, P., & Dijkman, R. (2013). A visual token-based formalization of BPMN 2.0 based on in-place transformations. Information and Software Technology, 55(2), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanwersch, R.J.B., Shahzad, K., Vanderfeesten, I., Vanhaecht, K., Grefen, P., Pintelon, L., Mendling, J., van Merode, G.G., & Reijers, H.A. (2016). A Critical Evaluation and Framework of Business Process Improvement Methods. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0417-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, H.M.W., & van der Aalst, W.M.P. 2005. Analyzing BPEL processes using Petri nets. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Applications of Petri Nets to Coordination, Workflow and Business Process Management (pp. 59–78). Agia Napa, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J. (2009). Design Principles for Reference Modelling. In T. Halpin, J. Krogstie, & E. Proper (Eds.), Innovations in Information Systems Modeling (pp. 269–296). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., & Mendling, J., Eds.. 2018. Business Process Management Cases. In Digital Innovation and Business Transformation in Practice. Management for Professionals. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, B., Reichert, M., & Rinderle-Ma, S. (2008). Change patterns and change support features‐enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data & knowledge engineering, 66(3), 438-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieloch, K., Filipowska, A., & Kaczmarek, M. 2011. Autocompletion for Business Process Modelling. In Business Information Systems Workshops (pp. 30–40). Poznań, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, M.T., Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., & Edmond, D. (2009). Business process verification-finally a reality! Business Process Managment Journal, 15(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150910931479
   Google Scholar