Une méthode intégrée pour la gestion des chaînes logistiques durables

Bibliographie

• Baumann, E., (2011). Modèles d’évaluation des performances économique, environnementale et sociale dans les chaînes logistiques. Thèse de doctorat. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Bieker, T., (2002). Managing Corporate Sustainability with the Balanced Scorecard: Developing a Balanced Scorecard for Integrity Management. 5th International Summer Academy on Technology Studies, Deutschlandsberg, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Bititci, U.S., (1995). Measuring the integrity of your business. Management Decision, vol. 33 n° 7, pp. 10-18.
   Google Scholar
• Bitton, M., (1990). ECOGRAI : méthode de conception et d’implantation de systèmes de mesure de performances pour organisations industrielles. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux I.
   Google Scholar
• Boukherroub, T., Guinet A., Fondrevelle J., (2012), Méthode d’aide à la décision multi- critères pour l’internalisation/externalisation “durable”, 9th International Conference on Modeling Optimization and Simulation, France.
   Google Scholar
• Boukherroub, T., (2013). Intégration des objectifs du développement durable dans la gestion stratégique et tactique de la chaîne logistique. Thèse de doctorat. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzembrak, Y., Allaoui, H., Masson, E., Bouchriha, H., Baklouti M., (2010), Sustainable Multimodal Supply Chain Design for Recycling Waterways Sediments, In 8th International Conference of Modeling and Simulation, Tunisia.
   Google Scholar
• Brimson, J.A. (1991). Activity accounting: An Activity Based Costing approach, John Wiley & Sons Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Collette, Y., Siarry, P., (2002), Optimisation multiobjectif, Editions Eyrolles.
   Google Scholar
• Clivillé, V., (2004). Approche systémique et méthode multicritère pour la définition d’un système d’indicateurs de performance, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Savoie.
   Google Scholar
• CMED (1987). Notre avenir à tous, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 432 p.
   Google Scholar
• Commission européenne (2001), Promouvoir un cadre européen pour la responsabilité sociale des entreprises-Livre vert, Luxembourg : Communautés Européennes.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, R., Bloemhof,J., Mallidis, I., (2012), Operations Research for Green Logistics - An Overview of Aspects, Issues, Contributions and Challenges. European Journal of Operational Research, n° 219, pp. 671 - 679.
   Google Scholar
• Dotoli, M., Fanti M.P.,Meloni, C., Zhou M.C. (2006), Design and Optimization of Integrated e-Supply Chain for Agile and Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 36 n° 1, pp. 62-75.
   Google Scholar
• Dyllick, T., Hockerts,K., (2002), Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, n° 11, pp. 130-141.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J., (1998), Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, News Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, I., Zanoni, S., Zavanella, L., Diana, A., (2007), Greening the Aluminium Supply Chain, International Journal of Production Economics, n° 108, p. 236-245.
   Google Scholar
• Germain, C.,Trébucq S., (2004), La performance globale de l’entreprise et son pilotage : quelques réflexions, Semaine Sociale Lamy, France.
   Google Scholar
• Globerson, S., (1985).Issues in Developing a Performance Criteria System for an Organization,International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 23 n° 4, pp. 639-646.
   Google Scholar
• GRI (2007), Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G30), The Netherlands: Global Reporting Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Gruat La Forme-Chretien, F. A., (2007). Référentiel d’évaluation de la performance d’une chaîne logistique - Application à une entreprise de l’ameublement. Thèse de doctorat, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Guillén-Gosàlbez, G., Grossmann, I.E., (2009), Optimal Design and Planning of Sustainable Chemical Supply Chains under Uncertainty, AIChe Journal, vol. 55 n° 1, pp. 99-121.
   Google Scholar
• Hammami, R., Frein, Y., Hadj-Alouane,A.B,(2009). A Strategic-tactical Model for the Supply Chain Design in the Delocalization Context: Mathematical Formulation and a Case Study, International Journal of Production Economics, n° 122, pp. 351-365.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, G., Saulquin, J.Y., (2009), Quand la RSE revisite la chaîne de valeur, Management & Avenir, n° 28.
   Google Scholar
• Hugo, A., Pistikopoulos,E.N., (2005), Environmentally Conscious Long-range Planning and Design of Supply Chain Networks, Journal of Cleaner Production, n° 13, pp. 1471-1491.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (2006), ISO 14040, Environmental management - Life Cycle Assessment - Goal and Scope Definition, Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (2010), ISO 26000, Guidance on social responsibility, Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., (1992), The- Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, pp. 71-79.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhal, S., Martel, A., Kettani, O. Oral, M., (2001), On the Optimization of Supply Chain Networking decisions, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 129 n°2, pp. 259-270.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N. Toppinen, A., (2011). Corporate Responsibility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Forest-based Industry: Complementary or Conflicting Goals? Forest Policy and Economics, n° 13, pp. 113-123.
   Google Scholar
• OCDE (2000), Text of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pati, R.K., Vrat, P., Kumarc, P., (2008), A Goal Programming Model for Paper Recycling System, Omega, n° 36, pp. 405-417.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Fortes, M.,Laínez-Aguirre, J.M., Arranz-Piera, P.,Velo, E.,Puigjaner, L., (2012), Design of Regional and Sustainable Biobased Networks for Electricity Generation Using a Multi-objective MILP Approach, Energy, n° 44, pp. 79-95.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto-Varela, T., Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.F.D., Novais, A.Q., (2011), Bi-objective Optimization Approach to the Design and Planning of Supply Chains: Economic versus Environmental Performances, Computers and Chemical Engineering, n° 35, pp. 1454-1468.
   Google Scholar
• Pishvaee, M.S., Razmi, J., Torabi, S.A., (2012), Robust PossibilisticProgramming for Socially Responsible Supply Chain NetworkDesign: A New Approach, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, n° 206, pp. 1 - 20.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty,TL., (1980), Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Sabio, N., Kostin, A.,Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Jiménez, L. (2012), Holistic Minimization of the Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Hydrogen Infrastructures Using Multi-objective Optimization and Principal Component Analysis, International Journal of hydrogen energy, n° 37, pp. 5385-5405.
   Google Scholar
• SCC, 2008. Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, Cypress Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., Yadav, S.S., Thakur, L.S., (2012). Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Multi-objective Linear Programming for Developing Low Carbon Supply Chain. Expert Systems with Applications, n° 39, pp. 8182 - 8192.
   Google Scholar
• You, F.,Tao, L., Graziano, D.J., Snyder, S.W., (2011), Optimal Design of Sustainable Cellulosic Biofuel Supply Chains: Multiobjective Optimization Coupled with Life Cycle Assessment and Input-Output Analysis, AIChe Journal, n° 58, pp. 1157-1180.
   Google Scholar