Références

• Allard-Poesi, F., et T. Loilier. 2009. « Qu’est-ce que la critique en Sciences du Management ? Que pourrait-elle être ? » Economies & Sociétés 1975–1999.
   Google Scholar
• Allard-Poési, F., et V. Perret. 2002. « Peut-on faire comme si le post-modernisme n’existait pas ? » Dans Questions de méthodes en sciences de gestion, edited by N. Mourgues et al, 255–219. Caen : EMS Economie et Management.
   Google Scholar
• Allard-Poésie, F., O. Germain, I. Huault, et G. Koenig. 2015. « Les théories des organisations sont-elles toujours bien inspirées ? Quatre regards. » Economies et Sociétés, Série K, Economie de l'entreprise,  ISMEA, 111–140.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 2008. “The Future of Critical Management Research” In Dans The Sage Handbook of New Approaches to Organization Studies, edited by Barry, 11–30. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 1992. “On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies.” Academy of Management Review 17 (3): 432–464. doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4281977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., et H. Willmott. 2011. Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction. Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M, and S Deetz. 1996. “Critical Theory and Postmodernism Approaches to Organization Studies.” In Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by S. Clegg, C. Hardy and WR. Nord. London: SAGE Publications Inc. doi:10.4135/9781848608030.n8.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., T. Bridgman, and H. Willmott. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amintas, A. 2002. « Une généalogie des techniques de contrôle : Une lecture de Michel Foucault. » Dans Technologie et management de l’information : Enjeux et impacts dans la comptabilité, le contrôle et l’audit, 13. France :  Congrés de l'Association Française de Comptabilité.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, M. 2010. “Emancipatory Management: The Contradiction between Practice and Discourse.” Journal of Management Inquiry 19 (2): 166–184. doi:10.1177/1056492609357825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessire, D. 2002. « Recherches « critiques » en contrôle de gestion : Une typologie. » Dans Technologie et management de l’information : Enjeux et impacts dans la comptabilité, le contrôle et l’audit, 21. France : Congrés de l'Association Française de Comptabilité. May 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Sussex: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Buisson, A.-L. 2008. « Légitimité et sciences de gestion : état des lieux et perspectives. » Humanisme et Entreprise 4 (289) : 29–57. doi:10.3917/hume.289.0029.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, K., P. J. Singh, and R. Koroglu. 2006. “Supply Chain Management: A Structured Literature Review and Implications for Future Research.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 26 (7): 703–729. doi:10.1108/01443570610672202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camman, C., G. Guieu, L. Livolsi, et M. Monnet. 2013. « Les stratégies d’acteurs dans la mutualisation logistique. » Logistique & Management 21 (3) : 57–75. doi:10.1080/12507970.2013.11517025.
   Google Scholar
• Camman, C., et L. Livolsi, (2016), La « déconstruction créatrice », une démarche de recherche en Supply Chain Management. 11èmes Rencontres Internationales de la Recherche en Logistique, Lausanne, Septembre 7 au 9. 14
   Google Scholar
• Cazal, D. (2008). « Recherche critique en GRH : Intérêts, connaissance et action. », Actes du congrès annuel de l’Association de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, Dakar, Novembre 9 au 12. 20
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, T., and M. Boersma. 2017. “The Governance of Global Value Chains: Unresolved Human Rights, Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas in the Apple Supply Chain.” Journal of Business Ethics Juillet. 143 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L. 1996. “Does Isomorphism Legitimate?” Academy of Management Journal 39: 1024–1039. doi:10.5465/256722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1967. L’écriture et la différence. Paris: Editions du seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Desreumaux, A. 2005. Théorie des organisations. 2de ed. Paris : EMS.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell, Eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S. E., and G. M. Magnan. 2002. “The Rhetoric and Reality of Supply Chain Integration.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 32 (5): 339–361. doi:10.1108/09600030210436222.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, S., and S. Tennant. 2013. “The Non-Adoption of Supply Chain Management.” Construction Management and Economics 31 (10): 1038–1058. doi:10.1080/01446193.2013.830186.
   Google Scholar
• Fournieret, V., and C. Grey. 2000. « at a Critical Moment ; Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies.» Human Relations 1 (53): 7–32. doi:10.1177/0018726700531002.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S. 2005. “Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 4 (1): 75–91. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.16132558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1994. Les conséquences de la modernité. Paris : L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, S., and M. C. Schleper. 2017. “A Pathway Towards True Sustainability: A Recognition Foundation of Sustainable Supply Chain Management.” European Management Journal 35 (4.): 425–429. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., S. Papson, et N. Kersey. 2004. “Speed: Through, across & in - the Landscapes of Capita.” Fast Capitalism 2004 (1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., S. Papson, et N. Kersey. 2006. “Landscapes of the Social Relations of Production in a Global Economy.” Fast Capitalism 2: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Golsorkhi, D., I. Huault, et B. Leca. 2009. Les études critiques en management. Une perspective française. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1973. La technique et la science comme « idéologie. ». Paris : Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1979. Connaissance et intérêt. première édition, 1976. Tel, Paris : Gallimard, Coll.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. Théorie de l’agir communicationnel, tome 1 : Rationalité de l’agir et rationalisation de la société. Paris : Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., and N. Ellis (2009), “Ethics and Industrial Networks: A Levinasian Approach Towards the Study of Justice in the Supply Chain”, In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Industrial Marketing & Purchasing Group (IMP), Marseilles, France.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2008. Reification. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanngieser, A. 2013. “Tracking and Tracing: Geographies of Logistical Governance and Labouring Bodies.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31: 594–610. doi:10.1068/d24611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., and G. T. Hult. 2007. “Bridging Organization Theory and Supply Chain Management: The Case of Best Value Supply Chains.” Journal of Operations Management 25: 573–580. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., and G. T. Hult. 2011. “Buiding Theory about Supply Chain Management: Some Tools from Organizational Sciences.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 47: 12–18. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03220.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., M. C. Cooper, and J. D. Pagh. 1998. “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities.” The International Journal of Logistics Management 9 (2): 1–20. doi:10.1108/09574099810805807.
   Google Scholar
• Livolsi, L. 2009. Le Supply Chain Management: Synthèse Et Propositions. Grenoble: Actes de la Conférence annuelle de l’Association Internationale de Management Stratégique.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. La Condition Postmoderne. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A., O. Mongin, N. Lempereur, et J.-L. Schlegel. 2006 Décembre. « Qu’est-ce que la pensée postcoloniale ? »”. Esprit. 117. doi:10.3917/espri.0612.0117.
   Google Scholar
• Mcfarland, R.-G., et J. M. Payan. 2008. « Supply Chain Contagion.» Journal of Marketing 72 (March): 63–79. doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.63.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, J., A. Touboulic, and H. Walker. 2016. “Time to Get Real: The Case for Critical Action Research in Purchasing and Supply Management.” Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 22 (4): 255–257. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2016.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentzer, J. T., T. P. Stank, and T. L. Esper. 2008. “Supply Chain Management and Its Relationship to Logistics, Marketing, Production, and Operations Management.” Journal of Business Logistics 29 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1002/jbl.2008.29.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. 2004. “Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Bhaskar’s and Giddens’ Social Theories.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4): 403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00256.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisdon, J. C. 1997. Du Mode d’Existence des Outils de Gestion. Paris : Seli Arslan.
   Google Scholar
• Näslund, D. 2002. “Logistics Needs Qualitative Research – Especially Action Research.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 32 (5): 321–338. doi:10.1108/09600030210434143.
   Google Scholar
• New, S. 2004. “Supply Chains: Construction and Legitimation.” Dans Understanding Supply Chains. Concepts Critiques and Futures, edited by S. New and R. Westbrook, 69–108. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• New, S. 2015. “Modern Slavery and Supply Chains. The Limit of Corporate Social Responsibility?” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20 (6): 697–707. doi:10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, S., and P. Payne. 1995. “Research Frameworks in Logistics: Three Models, Seven Dinners and a Survey.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 25 (10): 60–77. doi:10.1108/09600039510147663.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. 2014. “Beyond Kulturkritik: Along the Supply Chain of Contemporary Capitalism.” Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research 6: 77–93. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.14677.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K. J., and C. W. Autry. 2014. “Supply Chain Management at the Crossroads: Divergent Views, Potential Impacts and Suggested Paths Forward.” Journal of Business Logistics 35 (1): 36–43. doi:10.1111/jbl.2014.35.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samra-Fredericks, D. 2005. “Strategic Practice “Discourse” and the Everyday Interactional Constitution of Power Effects.” Organization 12 (6): 803–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, N. R., Z. G. Zacharia, and B. S. Fugate. 2013. “The Interdisciplinary Future of Supply Chain Management Research.” Decision Sciences 44: 413–429. doi:10.1111/deci.2013.44.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskin, L., et M. de Nanteuil. 2011. Perspectives critiques en management. Pour une gestion citoyenne. Bruxelles : De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Touboulic, A., and H. Walker. 2015. “A Relational, Transformative and Engaged Approach to Sustainable Supply Chain Management: The Potential of Action Research.” Human Relations 69 (2): 301–343. doi:10.1177/0018726715583364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towers, N., and R. Chen. 2008. “Employing the Participative Paradigm as a Valid Empirical Approach to Gaining a Greater Understanding of Contemporary Supply Chain and Distribution Management Issues.” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 36 (8): 627–637. doi:10.1108/09590550810883478.
   Google Scholar
• Townley, B. 1994. Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2009. “Supply Chains and the Human Condition.” Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society 21 (2): 148–176. doi:10.1080/08935690902743088.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2015. “Why Institutional Theory Cannot Be Critical.” Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (1): 105–111. doi:10.1177/1056492614545306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, W., and T. J. Goldsby. 2017. “Ensuring Impact: Thought Leadership in Logistics and Supply Chain Research.” Journal of Business Logistics 38: 78–79. doi:10.1111/jbl.2017.38.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar