Modelling of risk effect of mercury on nutrient transformation in lake sediments

References

• Topalova Y. Biological control and management of wastewater treatment. Sofia: PublishScieSet-Eco; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit JM, Mason RP, Gilmour CC. Estimation of mercury-sulfide speciation in sediment pore waters using octanol-water partitioning and implications for availability to methylating bacteria. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1999;18(10):2138–2141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, MB, Shaw G, Lester JN. Mercury modeling to predict contamination and bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000;164:69–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huibregtse K. Sediment management: should it be on your radar screen? Pollut Eng. 2006;38(10):26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hylander LD, Pinto FN, Guimaraes JD, Meili M, Oliveira LJ, Silva EE. Fish mercury concentration in the Alto Pantanal, Brazil: influence of season and water parameters. Sci Total Environ. 2000;261(1–3):9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland EM, Gobas FC, Branfireun BA, Heyes A. Environmental controls on the speciation and distribution of mercury in coastal sediments. Marine Chem. 2006;102(1–2):111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain EB, Jakus PM, Rice G, Lupi F, Maxson PA, Pacyna JM, Penn A, Spiegel SJ, Veiga MM. Socioeconomic consequences of mercury use and pollution. Ambio. 2007; 36(1):45–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA: EPA can better implement its strategy for managing contaminated sediments. [Internet]. In: Office of the Inspector General (Ed.) Washington: The United States Environmental Protection Agency; Report No. 2006-P-00016.[2006 March 15]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2006/20060315-2006-P-00016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. Mercury study report to Congress. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, US; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ullrich SM, Tanton TW, Abdrashitova SA. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Tech. 2001;31(3):241–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. Mercury in the aquatic environment: sources, releases, transport and monitoring. Geneva (Switzerland): UNEP's Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE) Chemicals Branch, UNEP; 2011. (Prepared by The Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of the Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP), Working Group 37).
   Google Scholar
• Cordy P, Veiga MM, Salih I, Al-Saadi S, Console S, Garcia O, Alberto Mesa L, Velasquez-Lopez PC, Roeser M. Mercury contamination from artisanal gold mining in Antioquia, Colombia: the world's highest per capita mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2011;410:154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drace K, Kiefer AM, Veiga MM, Williams MK, Ascari B, Knapper KA, Logan, KM, Breslin VM, Skidmore A, Bolt DA, Geist G, Reidy L, Cizdziel JV. Mercury-free, small-scale artisanal gold mining in Mozambique: utilization of magnets to isolate gold at clean tech mine. J Cleaner Prod. 2012;32:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebinghaus R, Turner RR, de Lacerda LD, Vasiliev O, Salomonsm W. Mercury contaminated sites: characterization, risk assessment and remediation. New York: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Krisnayanti BD, Anderson CN, Utomo WH, Feng X, Handayanto E, Mudarisna N, Ikram H, Khususiah. Assessment of environmental mercury discharge at a four-year-old artisanal gold mining area on Lombok Island, Indonesia. J Environ Monit. 2012;14(10):2598–2607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meech JA, Veiga MM, Tromans D. Reactivity of mercury from gold mining activities in darkwater ecosystems. Ambio. 1998;27(2):92–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall PM, Chattopadhyay S. Mercury contaminated sedimentsites-An evaluation of remedial options. Environ Res. 2013;125:131–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telmer KH, Veiga MM. World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining. In: Mason R, Pirrone N, editors. Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere: emissions, measurements and models. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 131–172.
   Google Scholar
• Veiga M, Meech J. Reduction of mercury emissions from gold mining activities and remedial procedures for polluted sites. In: Azcue JM, editor. Environmental impacts of mining activities. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Gluszcz P, Furch K, Ledakowicz S. Mercury in the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry. In: Wagner-Dobler, I., editor. Bioremediation of mercury: current research and industrial applications. Norwich: Caister Academic Press; 2012. p. 16–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyushchenko M, Panichkin V, Randall P, Kamberov R. Former chlor-alkali factory in Pavlodar, Kazakhstan: mercury pollution, treatment options, and results of post-demercurization monitoring. In: Wagner-Dobler I, editor. Bioremediation of mercury: current research and industrial applications. Norwich: Caister Academic Press; 2012. p. 17–65.
   Google Scholar
• Randall P, Ilyushchenko M, Lapshin E, Kuzmenko L. Case study: mercury pollution near a chemical plant in Northern Kazakhstan. Pittsburgh (PA): A&WMA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reis AT, Rodrigues SM, Arau´ jo C, Coelho J P, Pereira E, Duarte AC. Mercury contamination in the vicinity of a chlor-alkali plant and potential risks to local population. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407(8):2689–2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich SM, Ilyushchenko MA, Kamberov IM, Tanton TW. Mercury contamination in the vicinity of a derelict chlor-alkali plant. Part I: sediment and water contamination of Lake Balkyldak and the River Irtysh. Sci Total Environ. 2007;381(1–3):290–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaeva R, Topalova Y, Yaneva I, Pehlivanov L, Traykov I, Kenderov L, Daskalova E, Lincheva S. Evaluation of the environmental effect of the ecosystem of the Iskar River and the technical condition of the facilities on the Middle Iskar cascade from 2011. Sofia: Sofia University and University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lincheva S, Todorova Y, Topalova Y. Diversity and significance of microbial communities in sediments from Lakatnik and Svrazhen reservoir in ‘Middle Iskar’ cascade. Paper presented at: Youth Conference Kliment's Days; 22–23 November 2011; Sofia.
   Google Scholar
• Ilkova T, Petrov M, Atanasova M, Rousseau D. An analysis and assessment of models for characteristic of the river ecosystem pollution. Biotechnol & Biotechnol Eq. 2006;20:84–88.
   Google Scholar
• APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetzov SI, Dubinina GA. Methods of investigation of aqueous microorganisms. Moscow: Science; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Uzunov Y, Kovachev S. Hydrobiology. Sofia: Pensoft; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Golding GR, Kelly CA, Sparling R, Loewen PC, Rudd JM, Barkay T. Evidence of facilitated uptake of Hg(II) by vibrio anguillarum and escherichia coli under anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Limnol Oceanogr. 2002;47(4):967–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman KS, Akimov VN, Suzina NE, Vainshtein MB, Liang X. Sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfobulbus sp. strain BH from a freshwater lake in Guizhou Province, China. Inland Water Biol. 2013;6(1):13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower J, Savage KS, Weinman B, Barnett MO, Hamilton WP, Harper WF. Immobilization of mercury by pyrite (FeS2), Environ. Pollut. 2008;156(2):504–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JK, Harmon SM, Fu TT, Gladden JB. Mercury removal, methylmercury formation, and sulfate-reducing bacteria profiles in wetland mesocosms. Chemosphere. 2002;46(6):859–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner J. Activated sludge: bulking and foaming control. Boca Raton (FL): CRC; 1994.
   Google Scholar