Comparison of the effects of different loading locations on stresses transferred to straight and angled implant-supported zirconia frameworks: a finite element method study

References

• Las Casas EB, Ferreira PC, Cimini CAJR, Toledo EM, Barra LP, Cruz M. Comparative 3D finite element stress analysis of straight and angled wedge-shaped implant designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:215–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:161–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lındstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:405–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağlar A, Aydın C, Ozen J, Yılmaz C, Korkmaz T. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canay S, Hersek N, Akpınar I, Asık Z. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:591–598.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutter F, Schroeder A, Buser DA. The new concept of ITI hollow cylinder and hollow screw implants, 1: engineering and design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:161–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ten Bruggenkate CM, Oosterbeek HS, Krekeler G, Asikainen PJ. The placement of angled implants in the edentulous maxilla for the use of overdentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:807–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist R. A bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:38–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino G, Pozzi A, Schiavetti R, Barlattani A. Stress distribution on a three-unit implant-supported zirconia framework. A 3D finite element analysis and fatigue test. Oral Implantol. 2012;5:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclean JW, Kedge M. The science and art of dental ceramics. In: Preston J, editor. Perspectives in dental ceramics. Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1988. p. 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sonugelen M, Artuc C. Ağız Protezleri ve Biyomekanik [Oral prostheses and biomechanics]. İzmir: Ege Univ Diş Hek Fak Yayınları; 2002. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Geng J, Yan W, Xu W. Application of the finite element method in ımplant dentistry. Zhejiang: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Beer FP, Johnston ER. Mechanics of materials. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Baggi L, Cappeloni I, Girolima MD, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kılıçarslan MA, Eskitaşçıoğlu G. Three dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien WJ, editor. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Hanover Park (IL): Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ash MM, Nelson N. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion. 8th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Magne P, Perakis N, Belser UC, Krejci I. Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: a finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:516–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ona M, Watanabe C, Igarashi Y, Wakabayashi N. Influence of preparation design on failure risks of ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis. J Adhes Dent. 201;13:367–373.
   Google Scholar
• Belli S, Eskitaşcioglu G, Eraslan O, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effect of hybrid layer on stress distribution in a premolar tooth restored with composite or ceramic inlay: an FEM study. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2005;74:665–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function – a review of the literature. 1. The form of the masticatory cycle. J Oral Rehabil. 1975;2:281–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Mauderli A, Lundeen HC, Walsh EK. Limits of human bite strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56:226–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Naito T, Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:60–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai SR, Singh R, Karthikeyan I, Reetika G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of effect of prosthetic materials and short implant biomechanics on D4 bone under immediate loading. J Dental Implants. 2012;2:2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 1998;24:80–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder A, Sutter F, Krekeler G. Orale Implantologie: Allgemeine Grundlagen Und ITI-Hohlzylindersystem [Oral implantology: general principles and ITI hollow cylinder system]. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1988. German.
   Google Scholar
• Satoh T, Maeda Y, Komiyama Y. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:533–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, Da Silva Barra LP, Cruz S. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:391–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira PC. Modeling of the biomechanical behaviour of an edentulous mandible with vertical and angled implants [dissertation]. Belo Horizonte: Federal University of Minas Gerais; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar